共聚焦内镜在鉴别浸润边缘中枢神经系统肿瘤组织中的准确性:一项前瞻性临床试验的结果。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Francesco Restelli, Bianca Pollo, Elio Mazzapicchi, Irene Tramacere, Morgan Broggi, Jacopo Falco, Marco Schiariti, Mario Stanziano, Francesco Dimeco, Paolo Ferroli, Gianluca Marucci, Ignazio G Vetrano, Francesco Acerbi
{"title":"共聚焦内镜在鉴别浸润边缘中枢神经系统肿瘤组织中的准确性:一项前瞻性临床试验的结果。","authors":"Francesco Restelli, Bianca Pollo, Elio Mazzapicchi, Irene Tramacere, Morgan Broggi, Jacopo Falco, Marco Schiariti, Mario Stanziano, Francesco Dimeco, Paolo Ferroli, Gianluca Marucci, Ignazio G Vetrano, Francesco Acerbi","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06302-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously shown the usefulness of a new confocal endomicroscopy system (CONVIVO<sup>®</sup>) in providing a quick and reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis ex vivo in glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we aimed to assess the intraoperative usefulness of CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> in an in-vivo setting, focusing on its capability to explore the presence of residual tumor at the resection margins of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We consecutively enrolled patients submitted to fluorescein-guided CNS-tumor removal (May 2020 to December 2022). CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> was used in vivo to obtain images from virtual biopsies at the central tumor core and at its margin of resection, evaluating its ability to offer a histological diagnosis at the center and a tumor tissue identification at the periphery, with respect to corresponding standard histological sections. CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> images were analyzed before interpretation of permanent or frozen sections, with the pathologist being totally blinded to histological results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were studied. The most frequent diagnoses were GBM (50.6%) and metastasis (13.3%). At the tumor margins, on a total of 169 biopsies, we obtained an overall accuracy in tumor tissue identification of 82.2% (95% CI 75.0-89.5) in GBM/Grade 4 IDH-mutated astrocytomas, and 85.8% (95% CI 80.5-91.1) considering all tumors together. At the tumor center, a correct intraoperative diagnosis was obtained in 67.6% (95% CI 56.9-78.2) of all the cases, and in 80.9% (95% CI 69.1-92.8) of the GBM/Grade 4 IDH-mutated astrocytoma subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> allowed to accurately assess the presence of pathological marginal tissue remnants during resection of aggressive CNS tumors. More studies are needed to evaluate if this could possibly improve the extent of resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confocal endomicroscopy accuracy in identifying central nervous system tumors tissue at the infiltration margins: results from a prospective clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Restelli, Bianca Pollo, Elio Mazzapicchi, Irene Tramacere, Morgan Broggi, Jacopo Falco, Marco Schiariti, Mario Stanziano, Francesco Dimeco, Paolo Ferroli, Gianluca Marucci, Ignazio G Vetrano, Francesco Acerbi\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06302-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously shown the usefulness of a new confocal endomicroscopy system (CONVIVO<sup>®</sup>) in providing a quick and reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis ex vivo in glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we aimed to assess the intraoperative usefulness of CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> in an in-vivo setting, focusing on its capability to explore the presence of residual tumor at the resection margins of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We consecutively enrolled patients submitted to fluorescein-guided CNS-tumor removal (May 2020 to December 2022). CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> was used in vivo to obtain images from virtual biopsies at the central tumor core and at its margin of resection, evaluating its ability to offer a histological diagnosis at the center and a tumor tissue identification at the periphery, with respect to corresponding standard histological sections. CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> images were analyzed before interpretation of permanent or frozen sections, with the pathologist being totally blinded to histological results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were studied. The most frequent diagnoses were GBM (50.6%) and metastasis (13.3%). At the tumor margins, on a total of 169 biopsies, we obtained an overall accuracy in tumor tissue identification of 82.2% (95% CI 75.0-89.5) in GBM/Grade 4 IDH-mutated astrocytomas, and 85.8% (95% CI 80.5-91.1) considering all tumors together. At the tumor center, a correct intraoperative diagnosis was obtained in 67.6% (95% CI 56.9-78.2) of all the cases, and in 80.9% (95% CI 69.1-92.8) of the GBM/Grade 4 IDH-mutated astrocytoma subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CONVIVO<sup>®</sup> allowed to accurately assess the presence of pathological marginal tissue remnants during resection of aggressive CNS tumors. More studies are needed to evaluate if this could possibly improve the extent of resection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06302-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06302-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们之前已经证明了一种新的共聚焦内镜系统(CONVIVO®)在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)术中体外诊断提供了一种快速可靠的方法。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估CONVIVO®在体内环境中的术中实用性,重点关注其探索中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤切除边缘残余肿瘤存在的能力。方法:我们连续入组接受荧光素引导的中枢神经系统肿瘤切除术的患者(2020年5月至2022年12月)。在体内使用CONVIVO®从中央肿瘤核心和切除边缘的虚拟活检中获得图像,评估其在中心提供组织学诊断和在外围提供肿瘤组织识别的能力,相对于相应的标准组织学切片。在永久切片或冷冻切片解释之前,对CONVIVO®图像进行分析,病理学家完全不知道组织学结果。结果:对75例患者进行了研究。最常见的诊断是GBM(50.6%)和转移(13.3%)。在肿瘤边缘,在总共169次活检中,我们获得了GBM/ 4级idh突变星形细胞瘤肿瘤组织识别的总体准确性为82.2% (95% CI 75.0-89.5),考虑到所有肿瘤,肿瘤组织识别的总体准确性为85.8% (95% CI 80.5-91.1)。在肿瘤中心,67.6% (95% CI 56.9-78.2)的病例获得了正确的术中诊断,80.9% (95% CI 69.1-92.8)的GBM/ 4级idh突变星形细胞瘤亚组获得了正确的术中诊断。结论:CONVIVO®可以准确评估侵袭性中枢神经系统肿瘤切除过程中病理边缘组织残留物的存在。需要更多的研究来评估这是否可能改善切除的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confocal endomicroscopy accuracy in identifying central nervous system tumors tissue at the infiltration margins: results from a prospective clinical trial.

Background: We have previously shown the usefulness of a new confocal endomicroscopy system (CONVIVO®) in providing a quick and reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis ex vivo in glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we aimed to assess the intraoperative usefulness of CONVIVO® in an in-vivo setting, focusing on its capability to explore the presence of residual tumor at the resection margins of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors.

Methods: We consecutively enrolled patients submitted to fluorescein-guided CNS-tumor removal (May 2020 to December 2022). CONVIVO® was used in vivo to obtain images from virtual biopsies at the central tumor core and at its margin of resection, evaluating its ability to offer a histological diagnosis at the center and a tumor tissue identification at the periphery, with respect to corresponding standard histological sections. CONVIVO® images were analyzed before interpretation of permanent or frozen sections, with the pathologist being totally blinded to histological results.

Results: Seventy-five patients were studied. The most frequent diagnoses were GBM (50.6%) and metastasis (13.3%). At the tumor margins, on a total of 169 biopsies, we obtained an overall accuracy in tumor tissue identification of 82.2% (95% CI 75.0-89.5) in GBM/Grade 4 IDH-mutated astrocytomas, and 85.8% (95% CI 80.5-91.1) considering all tumors together. At the tumor center, a correct intraoperative diagnosis was obtained in 67.6% (95% CI 56.9-78.2) of all the cases, and in 80.9% (95% CI 69.1-92.8) of the GBM/Grade 4 IDH-mutated astrocytoma subgroup.

Conclusions: CONVIVO® allowed to accurately assess the presence of pathological marginal tissue remnants during resection of aggressive CNS tumors. More studies are needed to evaluate if this could possibly improve the extent of resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信