过氧化苯甲酰在接触性过敏和过敏性接触性皮炎实验中的致敏潜力和效力。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Kerstin Egele, Hans Drexler, Manigé Fartasch, Vera van Kampen, Hans F. Merk, Dennis Nowak, Axel Schnuch, Wolfgang Uter, Patricia Kreis, Brunhilde Blömeke
{"title":"过氧化苯甲酰在接触性过敏和过敏性接触性皮炎实验中的致敏潜力和效力。","authors":"Kerstin Egele,&nbsp;Hans Drexler,&nbsp;Manigé Fartasch,&nbsp;Vera van Kampen,&nbsp;Hans F. Merk,&nbsp;Dennis Nowak,&nbsp;Axel Schnuch,&nbsp;Wolfgang Uter,&nbsp;Patricia Kreis,&nbsp;Brunhilde Blömeke","doi":"10.1111/cod.14765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Positive patch test responses to benzoyl peroxide (BPO) have been reported from patients without and with known exposure. Up to 6.5% were found in the United States and 7.8% in a study including patients from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. We provide an overview of the skin sensitisation potential and potency of BPO based on animal experiments and non-animal methods. BPO tested positive in Guinea Pig Tests and the Local Lymph Node Assay. Application of the current OECD guideline to identify a skin sensitizer by combining non-animal method results gave differing outcomes. Moreover, patch test responses of patients to BPO were considered to determine the importance of BPO as a relevant occupational contact allergen. Another well-known BPO exposure is the topical application to treat acne. Despite widespread use, extensive and long-term skin exposure, we found for this group only studies reporting few positive patch test reactions. Further, occupational handling of BPO and contact allergy is reported by dental technicians. In-depth evaluation of the prevalence of contact allergy in different professions with suspected BPO exposure did not reveal an association with occupational handling of BPO. Consequently, a generally increased risk for those professions is not supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"92 6","pages":"436-445"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.14765","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benzoyl Peroxide's Sensitisation Potential and Potency in Experimental Methods and Review of Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis\",\"authors\":\"Kerstin Egele,&nbsp;Hans Drexler,&nbsp;Manigé Fartasch,&nbsp;Vera van Kampen,&nbsp;Hans F. Merk,&nbsp;Dennis Nowak,&nbsp;Axel Schnuch,&nbsp;Wolfgang Uter,&nbsp;Patricia Kreis,&nbsp;Brunhilde Blömeke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cod.14765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Positive patch test responses to benzoyl peroxide (BPO) have been reported from patients without and with known exposure. Up to 6.5% were found in the United States and 7.8% in a study including patients from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. We provide an overview of the skin sensitisation potential and potency of BPO based on animal experiments and non-animal methods. BPO tested positive in Guinea Pig Tests and the Local Lymph Node Assay. Application of the current OECD guideline to identify a skin sensitizer by combining non-animal method results gave differing outcomes. Moreover, patch test responses of patients to BPO were considered to determine the importance of BPO as a relevant occupational contact allergen. Another well-known BPO exposure is the topical application to treat acne. Despite widespread use, extensive and long-term skin exposure, we found for this group only studies reporting few positive patch test reactions. Further, occupational handling of BPO and contact allergy is reported by dental technicians. In-depth evaluation of the prevalence of contact allergy in different professions with suspected BPO exposure did not reveal an association with occupational handling of BPO. Consequently, a generally increased risk for those professions is not supported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"volume\":\"92 6\",\"pages\":\"436-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.14765\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.14765\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.14765","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)的阳性斑贴试验反应已从未接触和已知接触的患者中得到报道。在一项包括德国、奥地利和瑞士患者的研究中,美国的这一比例高达6.5%,而在一项研究中,这一比例为7.8%。我们提供了基于动物实验和非动物方法的BPO皮肤致敏潜力和效力的概述。BPO在豚鼠试验和局部淋巴结试验中呈阳性。应用目前的经合组织指南,通过结合非动物方法的结果来识别皮肤致敏剂,得出了不同的结果。此外,还考虑了患者对BPO的斑贴试验反应,以确定BPO作为相关职业接触过敏原的重要性。另一个众所周知的BPO暴露是局部应用治疗痤疮。尽管广泛使用,广泛和长期的皮肤暴露,我们发现只有研究报告了少数积极的贴片试验反应。此外,牙科技术人员报告了BPO和接触性过敏的职业处理。对疑似接触过BPO的不同职业中接触性过敏的流行程度进行深入评估,并没有发现接触性过敏与职业处理BPO有关。因此,不支持这些职业普遍增加的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Benzoyl Peroxide's Sensitisation Potential and Potency in Experimental Methods and Review of Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Benzoyl Peroxide's Sensitisation Potential and Potency in Experimental Methods and Review of Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Positive patch test responses to benzoyl peroxide (BPO) have been reported from patients without and with known exposure. Up to 6.5% were found in the United States and 7.8% in a study including patients from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. We provide an overview of the skin sensitisation potential and potency of BPO based on animal experiments and non-animal methods. BPO tested positive in Guinea Pig Tests and the Local Lymph Node Assay. Application of the current OECD guideline to identify a skin sensitizer by combining non-animal method results gave differing outcomes. Moreover, patch test responses of patients to BPO were considered to determine the importance of BPO as a relevant occupational contact allergen. Another well-known BPO exposure is the topical application to treat acne. Despite widespread use, extensive and long-term skin exposure, we found for this group only studies reporting few positive patch test reactions. Further, occupational handling of BPO and contact allergy is reported by dental technicians. In-depth evaluation of the prevalence of contact allergy in different professions with suspected BPO exposure did not reveal an association with occupational handling of BPO. Consequently, a generally increased risk for those professions is not supported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信