糖尿病和肺结核:孟德尔随机化证据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ivaan Pitua, Raafidha Raizudheen, Mark Muyanja, Joseph Nyero, Morrish Okello Obol
{"title":"糖尿病和肺结核:孟德尔随机化证据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ivaan Pitua, Raafidha Raizudheen, Mark Muyanja, Joseph Nyero, Morrish Okello Obol","doi":"10.1186/s13098-025-01615-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are global health challenges, each imposing significant morbidity and mortality. Observational studies suggest an increased TB risk in individuals with DM, yet causal relationships remain unclear due to potential confounding factors. Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a method to assess causality by leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables, mitigating biases from confounding and reverse causation. This systematic review aimed to consolidate existing MR evidence on the causal link between DM (types 1 and 2) and TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, identifying MR studies investigating the causal association between DM and TB. Studies were screened based on pre-specified inclusion criteria and assessed for quality using the STROBE-MR guidelines. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, MR methodology, and causal effect estimates. A meta-analysis was conducted estimate the pooled odds ratios for association between T2DM and TB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four MR studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning East Asian and European populations. Findings indicated a consistent causal relationship between DM (particularly type 2 diabetes) and increased TB risk, with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.07 to 1.24 (p < 0.05). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.2172 (95% CI: 1.1101-1.3347, p < 0.0001), indicating a significant positive association between T2DM and TB. One study identified pleiotropic effects, suggesting potential genetic overlap in DM and TB susceptibility. No reverse causal association was observed, indicating that TB does not increase the risk of DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights a causal association between DM and TB, emphasizing the need for integrated screening and management of DM within TB control programs, particularly in high-burden regions. Future MR studies should include diverse populations to enhance generalizability and explore genetic mechanisms underlying this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"17 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analyis of mendelian randomization evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Ivaan Pitua, Raafidha Raizudheen, Mark Muyanja, Joseph Nyero, Morrish Okello Obol\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13098-025-01615-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are global health challenges, each imposing significant morbidity and mortality. Observational studies suggest an increased TB risk in individuals with DM, yet causal relationships remain unclear due to potential confounding factors. Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a method to assess causality by leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables, mitigating biases from confounding and reverse causation. This systematic review aimed to consolidate existing MR evidence on the causal link between DM (types 1 and 2) and TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, identifying MR studies investigating the causal association between DM and TB. Studies were screened based on pre-specified inclusion criteria and assessed for quality using the STROBE-MR guidelines. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, MR methodology, and causal effect estimates. A meta-analysis was conducted estimate the pooled odds ratios for association between T2DM and TB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four MR studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning East Asian and European populations. Findings indicated a consistent causal relationship between DM (particularly type 2 diabetes) and increased TB risk, with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.07 to 1.24 (p < 0.05). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.2172 (95% CI: 1.1101-1.3347, p < 0.0001), indicating a significant positive association between T2DM and TB. One study identified pleiotropic effects, suggesting potential genetic overlap in DM and TB susceptibility. No reverse causal association was observed, indicating that TB does not increase the risk of DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights a causal association between DM and TB, emphasizing the need for integrated screening and management of DM within TB control programs, particularly in high-burden regions. Future MR studies should include diverse populations to enhance generalizability and explore genetic mechanisms underlying this association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01615-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01615-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结核病(TB)和糖尿病(DM)是全球性的健康挑战,每一种疾病的发病率和死亡率都很高。观察性研究表明,糖尿病患者的结核病风险增加,但由于潜在的混杂因素,因果关系尚不清楚。孟德尔随机化(MR)提供了一种评估因果关系的方法,通过利用遗传变异作为工具变量,减轻混杂和反向因果关系的偏差。本系统综述旨在巩固关于糖尿病(1型和2型)与结核病之间因果关系的现有MR证据。方法:在PubMed, Embase, b谷歌Scholar和Web of Science中进行了全面的搜索,确定了调查糖尿病和结核病之间因果关系的MR研究。根据预先指定的纳入标准筛选研究,并使用STROBE-MR指南评估质量。数据提取侧重于研究特征、MR方法和因果效应估计。进行了一项荟萃分析,估计T2DM和TB之间关联的合并优势比。结果:四项MR研究符合纳入标准,涵盖东亚和欧洲人群。研究结果表明,糖尿病(特别是2型糖尿病)与结核病风险增加之间存在一致的因果关系,比值比(OR)范围为1.07至1.24 (p)。结论:本综述强调了糖尿病与结核病之间的因果关系,强调了在结核病控制规划中对糖尿病进行综合筛查和管理的必要性,特别是在高负担地区。未来的MR研究应该包括不同的人群,以提高普遍性,并探索这种关联的遗传机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diabetes and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analyis of mendelian randomization evidence.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are global health challenges, each imposing significant morbidity and mortality. Observational studies suggest an increased TB risk in individuals with DM, yet causal relationships remain unclear due to potential confounding factors. Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a method to assess causality by leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables, mitigating biases from confounding and reverse causation. This systematic review aimed to consolidate existing MR evidence on the causal link between DM (types 1 and 2) and TB.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, identifying MR studies investigating the causal association between DM and TB. Studies were screened based on pre-specified inclusion criteria and assessed for quality using the STROBE-MR guidelines. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, MR methodology, and causal effect estimates. A meta-analysis was conducted estimate the pooled odds ratios for association between T2DM and TB.

Results: Four MR studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning East Asian and European populations. Findings indicated a consistent causal relationship between DM (particularly type 2 diabetes) and increased TB risk, with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.07 to 1.24 (p < 0.05). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.2172 (95% CI: 1.1101-1.3347, p < 0.0001), indicating a significant positive association between T2DM and TB. One study identified pleiotropic effects, suggesting potential genetic overlap in DM and TB susceptibility. No reverse causal association was observed, indicating that TB does not increase the risk of DM.

Conclusion: This review highlights a causal association between DM and TB, emphasizing the need for integrated screening and management of DM within TB control programs, particularly in high-burden regions. Future MR studies should include diverse populations to enhance generalizability and explore genetic mechanisms underlying this association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信