直接口服青霉素治疗有青霉素过敏标签的低风险患者的经济评价。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
R Bestwick, R Bhogal, K Kildonaviciute, B Y Ng, B Jackson, C Moriarty, C Thomas, L Savic, S A Misbah, M T Krishna, R Mujica-Mota
{"title":"直接口服青霉素治疗有青霉素过敏标签的低风险患者的经济评价。","authors":"R Bestwick, R Bhogal, K Kildonaviciute, B Y Ng, B Jackson, C Moriarty, C Thomas, L Savic, S A Misbah, M T Krishna, R Mujica-Mota","doi":"10.1111/cea.14633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Removing inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) can reduce unnecessary exposure to 'watch' and 'reserve' groups of antibiotics and thereby reduce antimicrobial resistance. The most efficient model for a non-allergy-specialist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service has not been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the costs to the UK National Health Service of a direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC) for low-risk patients with a PAL in three hospitals in England, each with a different non-allergy-specialist delivery model: pharmacist-led, nurse-led, and mixed multidisciplinary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cost analysis of the DPC pathway, including resources related to staff time and antibiotics. The effect of de-labelling on healthcare utilisation over 5 years was modelled using data from the published literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2257 patients from the Acute Medical or Infectious Disease Unit (AMU/IDU), Pre-surgical, and Haematology-Oncology departments were screened. Subsequently, 126 underwent DPC, and 122 were de-labelled. Twenty-two of these were de-labelled in time to affect their antibiotic regimen; 6 from AMU/IDU and 16 Pre-surgery. The DPC represented 22%-23% of the pathway cost in the pharmacist-led and mixed models, and 15% in the nurse-led model. Across departments and models, the cost per de-labelled patient varied between £577 (95% Credible Interval: 370, 633) for haematology-oncology patients to £2329 (947, 19,504) for AMU/IDU patients, both under the nurse-led model. After 5 years, recouping costs was unlikely for AMU/IDU patients under any model or for all patients combined under the mixed model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway cost was  ≥ 4-fold that of the DPC alone. Costs were up to 3 times higher in an acute compared to an elective setting. No short-term cost savings were identified from proactive or opportunistic penicillin allergy de-labelling in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Economic Evaluation of Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge for De-Labelling Low Risk Patients With a Penicillin Allergy Label.\",\"authors\":\"R Bestwick, R Bhogal, K Kildonaviciute, B Y Ng, B Jackson, C Moriarty, C Thomas, L Savic, S A Misbah, M T Krishna, R Mujica-Mota\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cea.14633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Removing inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) can reduce unnecessary exposure to 'watch' and 'reserve' groups of antibiotics and thereby reduce antimicrobial resistance. The most efficient model for a non-allergy-specialist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service has not been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the costs to the UK National Health Service of a direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC) for low-risk patients with a PAL in three hospitals in England, each with a different non-allergy-specialist delivery model: pharmacist-led, nurse-led, and mixed multidisciplinary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cost analysis of the DPC pathway, including resources related to staff time and antibiotics. The effect of de-labelling on healthcare utilisation over 5 years was modelled using data from the published literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2257 patients from the Acute Medical or Infectious Disease Unit (AMU/IDU), Pre-surgical, and Haematology-Oncology departments were screened. Subsequently, 126 underwent DPC, and 122 were de-labelled. Twenty-two of these were de-labelled in time to affect their antibiotic regimen; 6 from AMU/IDU and 16 Pre-surgery. The DPC represented 22%-23% of the pathway cost in the pharmacist-led and mixed models, and 15% in the nurse-led model. Across departments and models, the cost per de-labelled patient varied between £577 (95% Credible Interval: 370, 633) for haematology-oncology patients to £2329 (947, 19,504) for AMU/IDU patients, both under the nurse-led model. After 5 years, recouping costs was unlikely for AMU/IDU patients under any model or for all patients combined under the mixed model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway cost was  ≥ 4-fold that of the DPC alone. Costs were up to 3 times higher in an acute compared to an elective setting. No short-term cost savings were identified from proactive or opportunistic penicillin allergy de-labelling in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14633\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:去除不准确的青霉素过敏标签(PALs)可以减少不必要地暴露于“观察”和“储备”类抗生素,从而减少抗菌素耐药性。最有效的非过敏专家主导的青霉素过敏去标签(PADL)服务模式尚未建立。目的:确定英国国民健康服务体系(nhs)在英国三家医院为低风险PAL患者直接口服青霉素(DPC)的成本,每家医院都有不同的非过敏专科递送模式:药剂师主导、护士主导和混合多学科。方法:对DPC路径进行成本分析,包括人员时间和抗生素相关资源。使用已发表文献中的数据对5年以上的医疗保健利用的去标签效应进行建模。结果:共筛选了急性内科或传染病科(AMU/IDU)、术前和血液肿瘤科的2257例患者。随后126例行DPC, 122例去标签。其中22人及时取消了标签,影响了他们的抗生素治疗方案;6例来自AMU/IDU, 16例来自术前。在药剂师主导和混合模式中,DPC占途径成本的22%-23%,在护士主导模式中占15%。在不同的科室和模式下,每个去标签患者的成本从血液肿瘤学患者的577英镑(95%可信区间:370,633)到AMU/IDU患者的2329英镑(947,19504)不等,两者都是在护士主导的模式下。5年后,任何一种模式下的AMU/IDU患者或混合模式下的所有合并患者都不太可能收回成本。结论:青霉素过敏脱标途径成本是单用DPC的4倍以上。与选择性设置相比,急性设置的费用高达3倍。在本研究中,没有发现主动或机会性青霉素过敏去标签可以节省短期成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Economic Evaluation of Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge for De-Labelling Low Risk Patients With a Penicillin Allergy Label.

Background: Removing inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) can reduce unnecessary exposure to 'watch' and 'reserve' groups of antibiotics and thereby reduce antimicrobial resistance. The most efficient model for a non-allergy-specialist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service has not been established.

Objective: To determine the costs to the UK National Health Service of a direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC) for low-risk patients with a PAL in three hospitals in England, each with a different non-allergy-specialist delivery model: pharmacist-led, nurse-led, and mixed multidisciplinary.

Methods: Cost analysis of the DPC pathway, including resources related to staff time and antibiotics. The effect of de-labelling on healthcare utilisation over 5 years was modelled using data from the published literature.

Results: In total, 2257 patients from the Acute Medical or Infectious Disease Unit (AMU/IDU), Pre-surgical, and Haematology-Oncology departments were screened. Subsequently, 126 underwent DPC, and 122 were de-labelled. Twenty-two of these were de-labelled in time to affect their antibiotic regimen; 6 from AMU/IDU and 16 Pre-surgery. The DPC represented 22%-23% of the pathway cost in the pharmacist-led and mixed models, and 15% in the nurse-led model. Across departments and models, the cost per de-labelled patient varied between £577 (95% Credible Interval: 370, 633) for haematology-oncology patients to £2329 (947, 19,504) for AMU/IDU patients, both under the nurse-led model. After 5 years, recouping costs was unlikely for AMU/IDU patients under any model or for all patients combined under the mixed model.

Conclusions: The penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway cost was  ≥ 4-fold that of the DPC alone. Costs were up to 3 times higher in an acute compared to an elective setting. No short-term cost savings were identified from proactive or opportunistic penicillin allergy de-labelling in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信