Caterina Baldi, Stefano Gentileschi, Francesca Li Gobbi, Massimiliano Cazzato, Andrea Delle Sedie, Carla Gaggiano, Emilio D'Ignazio, Gemma Lepri, Chiara De Lorenzo, Carlotta Nannini, Laura Niccoli, Anna Panaccione, Luca Di Cato, Andrea Di Matteo, Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti, Serena Guiducci, Bruno Frediani, Maurizio Benucci
{"title":"upadacitinib在类风湿关节炎患者中的实际疗效和保留率:来自一项多中心研究的结果","authors":"Caterina Baldi, Stefano Gentileschi, Francesca Li Gobbi, Massimiliano Cazzato, Andrea Delle Sedie, Carla Gaggiano, Emilio D'Ignazio, Gemma Lepri, Chiara De Lorenzo, Carlotta Nannini, Laura Niccoli, Anna Panaccione, Luca Di Cato, Andrea Di Matteo, Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti, Serena Guiducci, Bruno Frediani, Maurizio Benucci","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Baldi, Stefano Gentileschi, Francesca Li Gobbi, Massimiliano Cazzato, Andrea Delle Sedie, Carla Gaggiano, Emilio D'Ignazio, Gemma Lepri, Chiara De Lorenzo, Carlotta Nannini, Laura Niccoli, Anna Panaccione, Luca Di Cato, Andrea Di Matteo, Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti, Serena Guiducci, Bruno Frediani, Maurizio Benucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了upadacitinib (UPA)在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的有效性和药物保留率(DRR)。多中心前瞻性观察研究。连续接受UPA治疗的RA患者在治疗0、3、6、12、18和24个月时进行评估。主要结局包括UPA DRR以及临床和血清学指标随时间的变化。研究纳入215例患者,其中女性72.6%,平均年龄60.1±11.7岁。6个月时UPA的DRR为91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%), 12个月时为84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%), 18个月时为80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%), 24个月时为80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%)。单药治疗和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗的UPA DRR相似(p = 0.47),不同治疗线的UPA DRR相似(p = 0.58)。考虑红细胞沉降率、c反应蛋白(CRP)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、疾病活动性评分(DAS)28-CRP、医生(Ph)和患者(Pt)总体评估(GA)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛、简化和临床疾病活动性指数(SDAI和CDAI),在24个月内观察到具有统计学意义的改善
Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study.
This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.