DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术中静脉血栓栓塞的延长与住院化疗预防:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Chandler Hinson, Matthew Sink, Rudolf F Buntic, Bauback Safa, Douglas M Sammer, Andrew Y Zhang, Christopher Pannucci, Andrei Odobescu
{"title":"DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术中静脉血栓栓塞的延长与住院化疗预防:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chandler Hinson, Matthew Sink, Rudolf F Buntic, Bauback Safa, Douglas M Sammer, Andrew Y Zhang, Christopher Pannucci, Andrei Odobescu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant complication following deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. The optimal duration of chemoprophylaxis remains debated, with differing recommendations on short-term chemoprophylaxis (STC) versus long-term chemoprophylaxis (LTC) for VTE prevention. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of STC versus LTC in preventing VTE and hematoma in patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction. Four studies with a total of 1114 patients were included, with no significant differences in patient characteristics, including Caprini scores, between the STC and LTC groups. The pooled incidence of VTE was 1.83%, with 2.19% in the STC group and 1.33% in the LTC group, yielding a risk ratio (RR) of 1.42 for STC compared to LTC, though this was not statistically significant (p=0.62). The mean incidence of hematoma was 8.65%, with 8.32% in the STC group and 9.02% in the LTC group, resulting in an RR of 0.78 for STC compared to LTC, which was also not statistically significant (p=0.62). These findings suggest that extending chemoprophylaxis beyond hospitalization does not significantly reduce VTE incidence and underscores the importance of individualized risk-based anticoagulation strategies. Future studies are necessary to further refine guidelines for chemoprophylaxis duration in this population, balancing the risks of VTE and anticoagulation-related complications to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended vs Inpatient Chemoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chandler Hinson, Matthew Sink, Rudolf F Buntic, Bauback Safa, Douglas M Sammer, Andrew Y Zhang, Christopher Pannucci, Andrei Odobescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant complication following deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. The optimal duration of chemoprophylaxis remains debated, with differing recommendations on short-term chemoprophylaxis (STC) versus long-term chemoprophylaxis (LTC) for VTE prevention. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of STC versus LTC in preventing VTE and hematoma in patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction. Four studies with a total of 1114 patients were included, with no significant differences in patient characteristics, including Caprini scores, between the STC and LTC groups. The pooled incidence of VTE was 1.83%, with 2.19% in the STC group and 1.33% in the LTC group, yielding a risk ratio (RR) of 1.42 for STC compared to LTC, though this was not statistically significant (p=0.62). The mean incidence of hematoma was 8.65%, with 8.32% in the STC group and 9.02% in the LTC group, resulting in an RR of 0.78 for STC compared to LTC, which was also not statistically significant (p=0.62). These findings suggest that extending chemoprophylaxis beyond hospitalization does not significantly reduce VTE incidence and underscores the importance of individualized risk-based anticoagulation strategies. Future studies are necessary to further refine guidelines for chemoprophylaxis duration in this population, balancing the risks of VTE and anticoagulation-related complications to optimize patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是腹下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建术后的重要并发症。化疗预防的最佳持续时间仍然存在争议,对于静脉血栓栓塞预防,短期化疗预防(STC)和长期化疗预防(LTC)的建议不同。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了STC与LTC在DIEP皮瓣重建患者预防静脉血栓栓塞和血肿的疗效和安全性。四项研究共纳入1114例患者,STC组和LTC组在患者特征(包括capriti评分)方面无显著差异。VTE的合并发生率为1.83%,STC组为2.19%,LTC组为1.33%,STC与LTC的风险比(RR)为1.42,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.62)。血肿平均发生率为8.65%,其中STC组为8.32%,LTC组为9.02%,STC与LTC的RR为0.78,差异无统计学意义(p=0.62)。这些发现表明,在住院后延长化学预防并不能显著降低静脉血栓栓塞的发生率,并强调了个体化基于风险的抗凝策略的重要性。未来的研究需要进一步完善这一人群的化疗预防持续时间指南,平衡静脉血栓栓塞和抗凝相关并发症的风险,以优化患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extended vs Inpatient Chemoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant complication following deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. The optimal duration of chemoprophylaxis remains debated, with differing recommendations on short-term chemoprophylaxis (STC) versus long-term chemoprophylaxis (LTC) for VTE prevention. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of STC versus LTC in preventing VTE and hematoma in patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction. Four studies with a total of 1114 patients were included, with no significant differences in patient characteristics, including Caprini scores, between the STC and LTC groups. The pooled incidence of VTE was 1.83%, with 2.19% in the STC group and 1.33% in the LTC group, yielding a risk ratio (RR) of 1.42 for STC compared to LTC, though this was not statistically significant (p=0.62). The mean incidence of hematoma was 8.65%, with 8.32% in the STC group and 9.02% in the LTC group, resulting in an RR of 0.78 for STC compared to LTC, which was also not statistically significant (p=0.62). These findings suggest that extending chemoprophylaxis beyond hospitalization does not significantly reduce VTE incidence and underscores the importance of individualized risk-based anticoagulation strategies. Future studies are necessary to further refine guidelines for chemoprophylaxis duration in this population, balancing the risks of VTE and anticoagulation-related complications to optimize patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信