欧盟以及在多极、分裂的世界中寻求全球治理

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Nicholas Sowels, Maria C. Latorre, Jan Wouters
{"title":"欧盟以及在多极、分裂的世界中寻求全球治理","authors":"Nicholas Sowels,&nbsp;Maria C. Latorre,&nbsp;Jan Wouters","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is said that the liberal, rules-based international order that was constructed in the ‘West’ during the <i>Pax Americana</i> following World War II, and which was successfully extended during the 1990s following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, is now seriously under threat—for many reasons. These include the war launched against Iraq in 2003 by the United States (US) and its allies; China's search for alternative institutions for international cooperation (via its Belt and Road Initiative and the expanding BRICS bloc); Russia's war against Ukraine since February 2022; the war in Gaza, Lebanon and to some extent, the West Bank, prosecuted by Israel in retribution for the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack; and last but not least, the re-election to the American Presidency of Donald Trump on 5 November 2024.</p><p>To be sure, war and ‘eliminationist assaults’ (Goldhagen <span>2010</span>)<sup>1</sup> did occur repeatedly during the second half of the 20th century, sometimes led by the US and the Soviet Union (respectively, the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan), sometimes as more local tragedies (like the exterminations of the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia during the 1970s or the Rwanda genocide in 1994). Nor was Europe entirely spared horror after 1945, as the collapse of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s brought with it ‘ethnic cleansing’, the Srebrenica Genocide and rape camps. Moreover, the Balkan wars led to a NATO bombing campaign against Serbia in 1999, to prevent Serbian assaults against the people of Kosovo. While this action was successful, it took place without a mandate by the United Nations (UN) Security Council and paved the way for further use of force in Iraq (2003) and Libya (2011).</p><p>Yet, despite all these serious violations of international law, it was thought by many through the 2010s that the international rules-based (liberal) order and global governance were still intact. So, it was with the European Union (EU or Union), which has been the most profound expression of this order, whereby nationalist and potentially bellicose rivalries are set aside and make way for cooperation and competition, framed within the rule of law, democracy and the respect of human rights, in the service of peace. This world seems now largely to be fading, which raises profound questions for the EU and its 27 Member States in pursuing international cooperation and about the very nature and identity of the Union itself.</p><p>For the EU, the immediate threats it faces are substantially aggravated by the arrival of the second Trump administration in January 2025. During his election campaign, Donald Trump proposed significantly raising tariffs, widely flagged his lack of interest in NATO and reiterated his disdain for international institutions. A protectionist and isolationist America, deepening its confrontational relationship with China, raises fundamental challenges to the future of the EU, economically, militarily and geopolitically. It raises existential questions about how the Union will be able to defend itself collectively, and about how it will position itself in the intensifying economic rivalry between the US and China, while dealing with its relative economic decline.</p><p>At the same time, the EU as a model for international cooperation beyond its borders and as a force for global governance is under considerable pressure. Domestically, populist nativism is intensifying across the continent, and the Union is sometimes seen as a nationalist-regionalist ‘imagined community’ grounded in ‘Eurowhiteness’ (Kundnani <span>2023</span>). However this may be, it cannot be denied that the EU and its Member States are taking an increasingly strident stance on migration, often with horrific consequences for migrants crossing the Mediterranean. Also, the EU and especially Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have been strongly backing Israel in its war in Gaza, despite the widespread destruction and ever-rising death toll. Overall, the EU's reputation as a peace project and as a model for supranational cooperation is severely tarnished.</p><p>The articles in this special issue of <i>Global Policy</i> nevertheless try to point to areas in which the EU retains experience in cross-border economic and political cooperation, and how some of its policies still strive to deepen international law and multilateral cooperation. Other contributions, however, show how the Union is asserting itself in the competitive struggle with other powers. These contributions were initially presented at a hybrid conference held by Una Europa's Global Governance Research Group in Paris on 8 December 2013.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"15 S8","pages":"5-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13479","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Union and the pursuit of global governance in a multi-polar, fractured world\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Sowels,&nbsp;Maria C. Latorre,&nbsp;Jan Wouters\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.13479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It is said that the liberal, rules-based international order that was constructed in the ‘West’ during the <i>Pax Americana</i> following World War II, and which was successfully extended during the 1990s following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, is now seriously under threat—for many reasons. These include the war launched against Iraq in 2003 by the United States (US) and its allies; China's search for alternative institutions for international cooperation (via its Belt and Road Initiative and the expanding BRICS bloc); Russia's war against Ukraine since February 2022; the war in Gaza, Lebanon and to some extent, the West Bank, prosecuted by Israel in retribution for the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack; and last but not least, the re-election to the American Presidency of Donald Trump on 5 November 2024.</p><p>To be sure, war and ‘eliminationist assaults’ (Goldhagen <span>2010</span>)<sup>1</sup> did occur repeatedly during the second half of the 20th century, sometimes led by the US and the Soviet Union (respectively, the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan), sometimes as more local tragedies (like the exterminations of the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia during the 1970s or the Rwanda genocide in 1994). Nor was Europe entirely spared horror after 1945, as the collapse of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s brought with it ‘ethnic cleansing’, the Srebrenica Genocide and rape camps. Moreover, the Balkan wars led to a NATO bombing campaign against Serbia in 1999, to prevent Serbian assaults against the people of Kosovo. While this action was successful, it took place without a mandate by the United Nations (UN) Security Council and paved the way for further use of force in Iraq (2003) and Libya (2011).</p><p>Yet, despite all these serious violations of international law, it was thought by many through the 2010s that the international rules-based (liberal) order and global governance were still intact. So, it was with the European Union (EU or Union), which has been the most profound expression of this order, whereby nationalist and potentially bellicose rivalries are set aside and make way for cooperation and competition, framed within the rule of law, democracy and the respect of human rights, in the service of peace. This world seems now largely to be fading, which raises profound questions for the EU and its 27 Member States in pursuing international cooperation and about the very nature and identity of the Union itself.</p><p>For the EU, the immediate threats it faces are substantially aggravated by the arrival of the second Trump administration in January 2025. During his election campaign, Donald Trump proposed significantly raising tariffs, widely flagged his lack of interest in NATO and reiterated his disdain for international institutions. A protectionist and isolationist America, deepening its confrontational relationship with China, raises fundamental challenges to the future of the EU, economically, militarily and geopolitically. It raises existential questions about how the Union will be able to defend itself collectively, and about how it will position itself in the intensifying economic rivalry between the US and China, while dealing with its relative economic decline.</p><p>At the same time, the EU as a model for international cooperation beyond its borders and as a force for global governance is under considerable pressure. Domestically, populist nativism is intensifying across the continent, and the Union is sometimes seen as a nationalist-regionalist ‘imagined community’ grounded in ‘Eurowhiteness’ (Kundnani <span>2023</span>). However this may be, it cannot be denied that the EU and its Member States are taking an increasingly strident stance on migration, often with horrific consequences for migrants crossing the Mediterranean. Also, the EU and especially Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have been strongly backing Israel in its war in Gaza, despite the widespread destruction and ever-rising death toll. Overall, the EU's reputation as a peace project and as a model for supranational cooperation is severely tarnished.</p><p>The articles in this special issue of <i>Global Policy</i> nevertheless try to point to areas in which the EU retains experience in cross-border economic and political cooperation, and how some of its policies still strive to deepen international law and multilateral cooperation. Other contributions, however, show how the Union is asserting itself in the competitive struggle with other powers. These contributions were initially presented at a hybrid conference held by Una Europa's Global Governance Research Group in Paris on 8 December 2013.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"15 S8\",\"pages\":\"5-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.13479\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13479\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据说,二战后“美国治下的和平”(Pax Americana)时期在“西方”建立的、以规则为基础的自由主义国际秩序,在苏联解体后的上世纪90年代得到了成功的延续,现在正受到严重威胁——原因有很多。其中包括2003年美国及其盟友对伊拉克发动的战争;中国寻求替代性国际合作机制(通过“一带一路”倡议和不断扩大的金砖国家集团);俄罗斯自2022年2月以来对乌克兰的战争;加沙、黎巴嫩以及某种程度上约旦河西岸的战争,是以色列为报复2023年10月7日哈马斯的袭击而起诉的;最后但并非最不重要的是,2024年11月5日唐纳德·特朗普将再次当选美国总统。可以肯定的是,战争和“灭绝主义攻击”(Goldhagen 2010)在20世纪下半叶确实反复发生,有时是由美国和苏联领导的(分别是越南和阿富汗的战争),有时是更多的地方性悲剧(如20世纪70年代柬埔寨波尔布特政权的灭绝或1994年卢旺达的种族灭绝)。1945年之后,欧洲也没有完全幸免于恐怖,因为20世纪90年代初南斯拉夫解体带来了“种族清洗”、斯雷布雷尼察种族灭绝和强奸营。此外,巴尔干战争导致北约在1999年对塞尔维亚进行轰炸,以防止塞尔维亚攻击科索沃人民。虽然这一行动取得了成功,但它是在未经联合国安理会授权的情况下进行的,为进一步在伊拉克(2003年)和利比亚(2011年)使用武力铺平了道路。然而,尽管存在所有这些严重违反国际法的行为,许多人在2010年代仍认为,基于规则的国际(自由)秩序和全球治理仍然完好无损。欧盟(EU或Union)也是如此,它是这一秩序最深刻的体现,在这种秩序中,民族主义和潜在的好战对抗被搁置一边,为合作与竞争让路,在法治、民主和尊重人权的框架内,为和平服务。这个世界现在似乎正在逐渐消失,这给欧盟及其27个成员国寻求国际合作以及欧盟本身的性质和身份提出了深刻的问题。对欧盟而言,2025年1月特朗普第二届政府的上台大大加剧了它面临的直接威胁。在竞选期间,唐纳德·特朗普提出大幅提高关税,广泛表示他对北约缺乏兴趣,并重申他对国际机构的蔑视。一个奉行保护主义和孤立主义的美国,深化了与中国的对抗关系,对欧盟的未来提出了根本性的挑战,无论是在经济上、军事上还是地缘政治上。它提出了关于欧盟如何能够集体自卫的存在性问题,以及在应对其相对经济衰退的同时,它将如何在美中之间日益加剧的经济竞争中定位自己。与此同时,欧盟作为境外国际合作的典范和全球治理的力量,也面临着相当大的压力。在国内,民粹主义本土主义正在整个欧洲大陆加剧,欧盟有时被视为一个基于“欧洲白化”的民族主义-地区主义“想象共同体”(Kundnani 2023)。然而,不可否认的是,欧盟及其成员国在移民问题上采取了越来越强硬的立场,这往往会给穿越地中海的移民带来可怕的后果。此外,欧盟,特别是委员会主席乌苏拉·冯德莱恩一直强烈支持以色列在加沙的战争,尽管造成了广泛的破坏和不断上升的死亡人数。总的来说,欧盟作为和平项目和超国家合作典范的声誉受到严重损害。然而,本期《全球政策》特刊的文章试图指出欧盟在跨境经济和政治合作方面保留经验的领域,以及欧盟的一些政策如何仍在努力深化国际法和多边合作。然而,其他贡献显示了欧盟如何在与其他大国的竞争斗争中坚持自己的立场。这些贡献最初是在2013年12月8日由欧罗巴联盟全球治理研究小组在巴黎举行的混合会议上提出的。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The European Union and the pursuit of global governance in a multi-polar, fractured world

It is said that the liberal, rules-based international order that was constructed in the ‘West’ during the Pax Americana following World War II, and which was successfully extended during the 1990s following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, is now seriously under threat—for many reasons. These include the war launched against Iraq in 2003 by the United States (US) and its allies; China's search for alternative institutions for international cooperation (via its Belt and Road Initiative and the expanding BRICS bloc); Russia's war against Ukraine since February 2022; the war in Gaza, Lebanon and to some extent, the West Bank, prosecuted by Israel in retribution for the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack; and last but not least, the re-election to the American Presidency of Donald Trump on 5 November 2024.

To be sure, war and ‘eliminationist assaults’ (Goldhagen 2010)1 did occur repeatedly during the second half of the 20th century, sometimes led by the US and the Soviet Union (respectively, the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan), sometimes as more local tragedies (like the exterminations of the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia during the 1970s or the Rwanda genocide in 1994). Nor was Europe entirely spared horror after 1945, as the collapse of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s brought with it ‘ethnic cleansing’, the Srebrenica Genocide and rape camps. Moreover, the Balkan wars led to a NATO bombing campaign against Serbia in 1999, to prevent Serbian assaults against the people of Kosovo. While this action was successful, it took place without a mandate by the United Nations (UN) Security Council and paved the way for further use of force in Iraq (2003) and Libya (2011).

Yet, despite all these serious violations of international law, it was thought by many through the 2010s that the international rules-based (liberal) order and global governance were still intact. So, it was with the European Union (EU or Union), which has been the most profound expression of this order, whereby nationalist and potentially bellicose rivalries are set aside and make way for cooperation and competition, framed within the rule of law, democracy and the respect of human rights, in the service of peace. This world seems now largely to be fading, which raises profound questions for the EU and its 27 Member States in pursuing international cooperation and about the very nature and identity of the Union itself.

For the EU, the immediate threats it faces are substantially aggravated by the arrival of the second Trump administration in January 2025. During his election campaign, Donald Trump proposed significantly raising tariffs, widely flagged his lack of interest in NATO and reiterated his disdain for international institutions. A protectionist and isolationist America, deepening its confrontational relationship with China, raises fundamental challenges to the future of the EU, economically, militarily and geopolitically. It raises existential questions about how the Union will be able to defend itself collectively, and about how it will position itself in the intensifying economic rivalry between the US and China, while dealing with its relative economic decline.

At the same time, the EU as a model for international cooperation beyond its borders and as a force for global governance is under considerable pressure. Domestically, populist nativism is intensifying across the continent, and the Union is sometimes seen as a nationalist-regionalist ‘imagined community’ grounded in ‘Eurowhiteness’ (Kundnani 2023). However this may be, it cannot be denied that the EU and its Member States are taking an increasingly strident stance on migration, often with horrific consequences for migrants crossing the Mediterranean. Also, the EU and especially Commission President Ursula von der Leyen have been strongly backing Israel in its war in Gaza, despite the widespread destruction and ever-rising death toll. Overall, the EU's reputation as a peace project and as a model for supranational cooperation is severely tarnished.

The articles in this special issue of Global Policy nevertheless try to point to areas in which the EU retains experience in cross-border economic and political cooperation, and how some of its policies still strive to deepen international law and multilateral cooperation. Other contributions, however, show how the Union is asserting itself in the competitive struggle with other powers. These contributions were initially presented at a hybrid conference held by Una Europa's Global Governance Research Group in Paris on 8 December 2013.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信