科学与正义

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Gregory E. Kaebnick
{"title":"科学与正义","authors":"Gregory E. Kaebnick","doi":"10.1002/hast.4942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>In different ways, the November-December 2024 issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report <i>contests the view that science is a value-free endeavor to understand the world. The lead article argues that, while most science is commendable, some is inherently “abhorrent,” as it is both harmful and devoid of value. Contemporary “race science”—the work of a “new wave of race researchers” who use “questionable scientific techniques to investigate alarming hypotheses regarding the genomic basis of differences in cognitive abilities between racial and ethnic groups”—is, for the authors, a paradigmatic case of abhorrent science. The intersection of genomics and values is also the subject of a special report, “Toward a More Just Genomics,” published with this issue</i>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 6","pages":"inside_front_cover"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4942","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science and Justice\",\"authors\":\"Gregory E. Kaebnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><i>In different ways, the November-December 2024 issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report <i>contests the view that science is a value-free endeavor to understand the world. The lead article argues that, while most science is commendable, some is inherently “abhorrent,” as it is both harmful and devoid of value. Contemporary “race science”—the work of a “new wave of race researchers” who use “questionable scientific techniques to investigate alarming hypotheses regarding the genomic basis of differences in cognitive abilities between racial and ethnic groups”—is, for the authors, a paradigmatic case of abhorrent science. The intersection of genomics and values is also the subject of a special report, “Toward a More Just Genomics,” published with this issue</i>.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"inside_front_cover\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4942\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4942\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2024年11月至12月出版的《黑斯廷斯中心报告》(Hastings Center Report)以不同的方式反驳了这样一种观点,即科学是一种与价值无关的理解世界的努力。第一篇文章认为,虽然大多数科学是值得赞扬的,但有些科学本质上是“可恶的”,因为它既有害又没有价值。当代“种族科学”——“新一波种族研究人员”的工作,他们使用“可疑的科学技术来调查关于种族和民族群体之间认知能力差异的基因组基础的令人担忧的假设”——对作者来说,是一个令人憎恶的科学的典型案例。基因组学和价值观的交叉点也是本期发表的一篇特别报道“迈向更公正的基因组学”的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science and Justice

In different ways, the November-December 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report contests the view that science is a value-free endeavor to understand the world. The lead article argues that, while most science is commendable, some is inherently “abhorrent,” as it is both harmful and devoid of value. Contemporary “race science”—the work of a “new wave of race researchers” who use “questionable scientific techniques to investigate alarming hypotheses regarding the genomic basis of differences in cognitive abilities between racial and ethnic groups”—is, for the authors, a paradigmatic case of abhorrent science. The intersection of genomics and values is also the subject of a special report, “Toward a More Just Genomics,” published with this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信