哥伦比亚两个地区原生稀树草原向改良草场转化过程中土壤有机碳的增加

Sandra Loaiza, Ciniro Costa Jr, Mayesse A. da Silva, Ngonidzashe Chirinda, Idupulapati Rao, Jacobo Arango, Jeimar Tapasco, Glenn Hyman
{"title":"哥伦比亚两个地区原生稀树草原向改良草场转化过程中土壤有机碳的增加","authors":"Sandra Loaiza,&nbsp;Ciniro Costa Jr,&nbsp;Mayesse A. da Silva,&nbsp;Ngonidzashe Chirinda,&nbsp;Idupulapati Rao,&nbsp;Jacobo Arango,&nbsp;Jeimar Tapasco,&nbsp;Glenn Hyman","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is limited knowledge on how to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks under tropical conditions. This study investigates SOC changes after converting land from native savanna (NS) to improved pasture (IP) land use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two acidic soil conversion sites were examined: (i) a poorly drained slope with medium-texture soil (Casanare [CAS]<sub>1</sub>) and (ii) flat terrain with fine-texture soil (CAS<sub>2</sub>). Another flat site was evaluated (Atlántico [ATL]), with fine-textured to moderately textured neutral soil. Soil samples were collected and analyzed. SOC stocks (0–60 cm soil depth) were estimated, with a complex analysis of variance analyzing pasture type and soil depth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>NS to IP conversion resulted in significant SOC accumulation in two regions, with losses in one (CAS<sub>2</sub>). ATL showed higher SOC accumulation than CAS. IP adoption led to SOC accumulation at depth (0–60 cm) after 10 years in CAS<sub>1</sub>. Elevated clay content in CAS<sub>2</sub> favored SOC storage, while poorly drained areas hindered accumulation in CAS<sub>1</sub>. Cultivating rice before IP at CAS<sub>2</sub> likely depleted SOC (0–20 cm), with 4 years of IP not restoring initial levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Adopting IP over NS can increase SOC. Grassland type, soil properties, and land-use change all influence SOC accumulation. These data inform sustainable land management for low-emission livestock production.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"3 4","pages":"318-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil organic carbon increase on conversion of native savanna to improved pasture in two regions of Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Loaiza,&nbsp;Ciniro Costa Jr,&nbsp;Mayesse A. da Silva,&nbsp;Ngonidzashe Chirinda,&nbsp;Idupulapati Rao,&nbsp;Jacobo Arango,&nbsp;Jeimar Tapasco,&nbsp;Glenn Hyman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/glr2.12101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is limited knowledge on how to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks under tropical conditions. This study investigates SOC changes after converting land from native savanna (NS) to improved pasture (IP) land use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two acidic soil conversion sites were examined: (i) a poorly drained slope with medium-texture soil (Casanare [CAS]<sub>1</sub>) and (ii) flat terrain with fine-texture soil (CAS<sub>2</sub>). Another flat site was evaluated (Atlántico [ATL]), with fine-textured to moderately textured neutral soil. Soil samples were collected and analyzed. SOC stocks (0–60 cm soil depth) were estimated, with a complex analysis of variance analyzing pasture type and soil depth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>NS to IP conversion resulted in significant SOC accumulation in two regions, with losses in one (CAS<sub>2</sub>). ATL showed higher SOC accumulation than CAS. IP adoption led to SOC accumulation at depth (0–60 cm) after 10 years in CAS<sub>1</sub>. Elevated clay content in CAS<sub>2</sub> favored SOC storage, while poorly drained areas hindered accumulation in CAS<sub>1</sub>. Cultivating rice before IP at CAS<sub>2</sub> likely depleted SOC (0–20 cm), with 4 years of IP not restoring initial levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adopting IP over NS can increase SOC. Grassland type, soil properties, and land-use change all influence SOC accumulation. These data inform sustainable land management for low-emission livestock production.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grassland Research\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"318-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12101\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grassland Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景关于热带条件下如何增加土壤有机碳储量的知识有限。本研究探讨了原生态草原(NS)用地向改良草场(IP)用地转化后土壤有机碳的变化。方法研究两个酸性土壤转化点:(i)排水差的中等质地土壤(Casanare [CAS]1)和(ii)平坦的细质地土壤(CAS2)。另一个平坦的地点被评估(Atlántico [ATL]),具有细质地到中等质地的中性土壤。采集土壤样品并进行分析。利用牧草类型与土壤深度的复杂方差分析,估算了0 ~ 60 cm土壤深层土壤有机碳储量。结果NS向IP转换导致两个区域的SOC积累显著,其中一个区域(CAS2)的SOC损失显著。ATL的SOC积累高于CAS。在CAS1中,IP的采用导致了10年后深度(0 ~ 60 cm)的有机碳积累。CAS2土壤中粘土含量的增加有利于土壤有机碳的储存,而排水差的地区则阻碍了CAS1土壤有机碳的积累。在CAS2条件下种植水稻可能耗尽了土壤有机碳(0-20 cm), 4年的土壤有机碳没有恢复到初始水平。结论采用IP over NS可以提高SOC。草地类型、土壤性质和土地利用变化均影响有机碳积累。这些数据为低排放畜牧生产的可持续土地管理提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil organic carbon increase on conversion of native savanna to improved pasture in two regions of Colombia

Soil organic carbon increase on conversion of native savanna to improved pasture in two regions of Colombia

Background

There is limited knowledge on how to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks under tropical conditions. This study investigates SOC changes after converting land from native savanna (NS) to improved pasture (IP) land use.

Methods

Two acidic soil conversion sites were examined: (i) a poorly drained slope with medium-texture soil (Casanare [CAS]1) and (ii) flat terrain with fine-texture soil (CAS2). Another flat site was evaluated (Atlántico [ATL]), with fine-textured to moderately textured neutral soil. Soil samples were collected and analyzed. SOC stocks (0–60 cm soil depth) were estimated, with a complex analysis of variance analyzing pasture type and soil depth.

Results

NS to IP conversion resulted in significant SOC accumulation in two regions, with losses in one (CAS2). ATL showed higher SOC accumulation than CAS. IP adoption led to SOC accumulation at depth (0–60 cm) after 10 years in CAS1. Elevated clay content in CAS2 favored SOC storage, while poorly drained areas hindered accumulation in CAS1. Cultivating rice before IP at CAS2 likely depleted SOC (0–20 cm), with 4 years of IP not restoring initial levels.

Conclusions

Adopting IP over NS can increase SOC. Grassland type, soil properties, and land-use change all influence SOC accumulation. These data inform sustainable land management for low-emission livestock production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信