绿地生态工业园区的中间演化:丹麦GreenLab之旅

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
L. Mortensen, L. Kørnøv, A. N. Gjerding, E. Rattigan, L. Schlüter
{"title":"绿地生态工业园区的中间演化:丹麦GreenLab之旅","authors":"L. Mortensen,&nbsp;L. Kørnøv,&nbsp;A. N. Gjerding,&nbsp;E. Rattigan,&nbsp;L. Schlüter","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transforming into eco-industrial parks (EIPs) by applying collaborative measures and stakeholder engagement is a practical and political response to the decline of current industrial parks, and a solution for fostering sustainable industrial development. While the brownfield approach (EIP development through retrofits and new strategies of existing establishments) is common, greenfield development—where sustainability is inherent in planning, design, and construction—is gaining interest. The present study uses the case of GreenLab in Denmark to explore the emergence and development of greenfield EIPs, showcasing the potential of a middle-out approach and emphasizing the role of curation in contrast to top-down and bottom-up processes. The study draws on a process-model analytical framework, encompassing the evolutionary phases, the actors involved, and the co-creation of the journey. The development of GreenLab is found to have passed through three phases of evolution: pre-emergence, emergence, and probation, increasing the “networkness” in the business park. We point to several critical factors that drove these phases, among which shared vision, road mapping, and engagement and political support from local, regional, and national actors are critical. Furthermore, strategic planning, continuous funding, and strong collaboration with research institutions have been essential. The replication potential of GreenLab is substantial, and the experiences accumulated over the years can guide other greenfield EIPs and new research avenues considering greenfield EIPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"28 6","pages":"1816-1829"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.13569","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle-out evolution of greenfield eco-industrial parks: The journey of GreenLab, Denmark\",\"authors\":\"L. Mortensen,&nbsp;L. Kørnøv,&nbsp;A. N. Gjerding,&nbsp;E. Rattigan,&nbsp;L. Schlüter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.13569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Transforming into eco-industrial parks (EIPs) by applying collaborative measures and stakeholder engagement is a practical and political response to the decline of current industrial parks, and a solution for fostering sustainable industrial development. While the brownfield approach (EIP development through retrofits and new strategies of existing establishments) is common, greenfield development—where sustainability is inherent in planning, design, and construction—is gaining interest. The present study uses the case of GreenLab in Denmark to explore the emergence and development of greenfield EIPs, showcasing the potential of a middle-out approach and emphasizing the role of curation in contrast to top-down and bottom-up processes. The study draws on a process-model analytical framework, encompassing the evolutionary phases, the actors involved, and the co-creation of the journey. The development of GreenLab is found to have passed through three phases of evolution: pre-emergence, emergence, and probation, increasing the “networkness” in the business park. We point to several critical factors that drove these phases, among which shared vision, road mapping, and engagement and political support from local, regional, and national actors are critical. Furthermore, strategic planning, continuous funding, and strong collaboration with research institutions have been essential. The replication potential of GreenLab is substantial, and the experiences accumulated over the years can guide other greenfield EIPs and new research avenues considering greenfield EIPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"1816-1829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.13569\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13569\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过合作措施和利益相关者的参与,向生态工业园区转型是对当前工业园区衰落的现实和政治回应,也是促进工业可持续发展的解决方案。虽然棕地方法(通过对现有设施的改造和新战略进行EIP开发)很常见,但绿地开发——其规划、设计和施工中固有的可持续性——正在引起人们的兴趣。本研究以丹麦的GreenLab为例,探索绿地eip的出现和发展,展示了中间方法的潜力,并强调了与自上而下和自下而上的过程相比,策展的作用。该研究利用了一个过程模型分析框架,包含了进化阶段、涉及的参与者和旅程的共同创造。GreenLab的发展经历了pre-emergence、emergence和probation三个发展阶段,增加了商业园区的“网络性”。我们指出了推动这些阶段的几个关键因素,其中共同愿景、路线图、地方、区域和国家行动者的参与和政治支持至关重要。此外,战略规划、持续资助以及与研究机构的强有力合作至关重要。GreenLab的复制潜力是巨大的,多年来积累的经验可以指导其他绿地eip和考虑绿地eip的新研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Middle-out evolution of greenfield eco-industrial parks: The journey of GreenLab, Denmark

Middle-out evolution of greenfield eco-industrial parks: The journey of GreenLab, Denmark

Transforming into eco-industrial parks (EIPs) by applying collaborative measures and stakeholder engagement is a practical and political response to the decline of current industrial parks, and a solution for fostering sustainable industrial development. While the brownfield approach (EIP development through retrofits and new strategies of existing establishments) is common, greenfield development—where sustainability is inherent in planning, design, and construction—is gaining interest. The present study uses the case of GreenLab in Denmark to explore the emergence and development of greenfield EIPs, showcasing the potential of a middle-out approach and emphasizing the role of curation in contrast to top-down and bottom-up processes. The study draws on a process-model analytical framework, encompassing the evolutionary phases, the actors involved, and the co-creation of the journey. The development of GreenLab is found to have passed through three phases of evolution: pre-emergence, emergence, and probation, increasing the “networkness” in the business park. We point to several critical factors that drove these phases, among which shared vision, road mapping, and engagement and political support from local, regional, and national actors are critical. Furthermore, strategic planning, continuous funding, and strong collaboration with research institutions have been essential. The replication potential of GreenLab is substantial, and the experiences accumulated over the years can guide other greenfield EIPs and new research avenues considering greenfield EIPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信