《北方报》的社论作者对墨西哥撤销授权的争论

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Latin American Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1111/lamp.12365

Eduardo E. Parrilla Sotomayor

{"title":"《北方报》的社论作者对墨西哥撤销授权的争论","authors":"Eduardo E. Parrilla Sotomayor","doi":"10.1111/lamp.12365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes a sample of editorial opinions from El Norte newspaper on the mandate revocation of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. In the March 27, 2022 edition, 2 weeks before the consultation, 46 editorialists expressed their opinions on the matter. Through Toulmin's theory of argumentation, this article analyzes the three ideological stances they took to determine whether they incur in fallacies—those who stated they would abstain from participating because they are against the President, those who stated they would participate to revoke his mandate, and those who expressed that the revocation was a valid exercise without stating how they would vote.","PeriodicalId":42501,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Policy","volume":"15 4","pages":"648-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The arguments of El Norte's editorialists on the mandate revocation in Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo E. Parrilla Sotomayor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lamp.12365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes a sample of editorial opinions from El Norte newspaper on the mandate revocation of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. In the March 27, 2022 edition, 2 weeks before the consultation, 46 editorialists expressed their opinions on the matter. Through Toulmin's theory of argumentation, this article analyzes the three ideological stances they took to determine whether they incur in fallacies—those who stated they would abstain from participating because they are against the President, those who stated they would participate to revoke his mandate, and those who expressed that the revocation was a valid exercise without stating how they would vote.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Policy\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"648-665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章分析了El Norte报纸关于总统安德罗萨·曼努埃尔·López奥夫拉多尔被撤销职权的社论意见样本。在咨询前2周的2022年3月27日版中，有46位社论作者发表了对此事的意见。通过图尔敏的论证理论，本文分析了他们所采取的三种意识形态立场，以确定他们是否会产生谬论——那些声称他们会因为反对总统而弃权的人，那些声称他们会参与撤销他的授权的人，以及那些表示撤销是一个有效的练习而没有说明他们将如何投票的人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The arguments of El Norte's editorialists on the mandate revocation in Mexico

This article analyzes a sample of editorial opinions from El Norte newspaper on the mandate revocation of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. In the March 27, 2022 edition, 2 weeks before the consultation, 46 editorialists expressed their opinions on the matter. Through Toulmin's theory of argumentation, this article analyzes the three ideological stances they took to determine whether they incur in fallacies—those who stated they would abstain from participating because they are against the President, those who stated they would participate to revoke his mandate, and those who expressed that the revocation was a valid exercise without stating how they would vote.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Latin American Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Latin American Policy (LAP): A Journal of Politics and Governance in a Changing Region, a collaboration of the Policy Studies Organization and the Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus, published its first issue in mid-2010. LAP’s primary focus is intended to be in the policy arena, and will focus on any issue or field involving authority and polities (although not necessarily clustered on governments), agency (either governmental or from the civil society, or both), and the pursuit/achievement of specific (or anticipated) outcomes. We invite authors to focus on any crosscutting issue situated in the interface between the policy and political domain concerning or affecting any Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) country or group of countries. This journal will remain open to multidisciplinary approaches dealing with policy issues and the political contexts in which they take place.