Chantal Widmer, Jasmin D. Busch, Dennis-Peter Born, Michael Romann
{"title":"用常规超声成像代替x光评估青少年足球的生物年龄的初步研究","authors":"Chantal Widmer, Jasmin D. Busch, Dennis-Peter Born, Michael Romann","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of the study was to evaluate conventional ultrasound (US) as a radiation-free alternative to X-ray for determining biological age (BA; indicated by skeletal age). BA, was determined in 24 healthy, male, elite youth soccer goalkeepers around peak height velocity (11–16 years of age) using both X-ray and conventional US scans of the left hand. X-ray scans were evaluated using the Tanner–Whitehouse 2 method. Conventional US scans served to determine BA via ossification ratios of 13 hand and wrist bones. The new conventional US method showed very strong correlation with X-ray <i>r</i> = 0.90 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, the agreement for the difference in BA and CA, which accounts for age-related variance, was classified poor (ICC = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, linear regression analysis and the Bland–Altman plot suggested the presence of a systematic and proportional overestimation of BA in younger players and an underestimation of BA in older players. Furthermore, Cohen's kappa showed a moderate agreement between players' classification into maturity groups for the two assessment methods. In conclusion, our study has shown that using US-derived ossification ratios did not deliver valid results compared to X-ray when determining BA in youth soccer goalkeepers.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12264","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Biological Age With Conventional Ultrasound Imaging as an Alternative to X-Ray—A Pilot Study in Youth Soccer\",\"authors\":\"Chantal Widmer, Jasmin D. Busch, Dennis-Peter Born, Michael Romann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of the study was to evaluate conventional ultrasound (US) as a radiation-free alternative to X-ray for determining biological age (BA; indicated by skeletal age). BA, was determined in 24 healthy, male, elite youth soccer goalkeepers around peak height velocity (11–16 years of age) using both X-ray and conventional US scans of the left hand. X-ray scans were evaluated using the Tanner–Whitehouse 2 method. Conventional US scans served to determine BA via ossification ratios of 13 hand and wrist bones. The new conventional US method showed very strong correlation with X-ray <i>r</i> = 0.90 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, the agreement for the difference in BA and CA, which accounts for age-related variance, was classified poor (ICC = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, linear regression analysis and the Bland–Altman plot suggested the presence of a systematic and proportional overestimation of BA in younger players and an underestimation of BA in older players. Furthermore, Cohen's kappa showed a moderate agreement between players' classification into maturity groups for the two assessment methods. In conclusion, our study has shown that using US-derived ossification ratios did not deliver valid results compared to X-ray when determining BA in youth soccer goalkeepers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12264\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Biological Age With Conventional Ultrasound Imaging as an Alternative to X-Ray—A Pilot Study in Youth Soccer
The aim of the study was to evaluate conventional ultrasound (US) as a radiation-free alternative to X-ray for determining biological age (BA; indicated by skeletal age). BA, was determined in 24 healthy, male, elite youth soccer goalkeepers around peak height velocity (11–16 years of age) using both X-ray and conventional US scans of the left hand. X-ray scans were evaluated using the Tanner–Whitehouse 2 method. Conventional US scans served to determine BA via ossification ratios of 13 hand and wrist bones. The new conventional US method showed very strong correlation with X-ray r = 0.90 (p < 0.05). However, the agreement for the difference in BA and CA, which accounts for age-related variance, was classified poor (ICC = 0.48, p < 0.05). Additionally, linear regression analysis and the Bland–Altman plot suggested the presence of a systematic and proportional overestimation of BA in younger players and an underestimation of BA in older players. Furthermore, Cohen's kappa showed a moderate agreement between players' classification into maturity groups for the two assessment methods. In conclusion, our study has shown that using US-derived ossification ratios did not deliver valid results compared to X-ray when determining BA in youth soccer goalkeepers.