M Espejo Mambié , D San Jose-Saras , C Bischofberger Valdés , C Díaz-Agero Pérez , JC Galán Montemayor , L Martínez-García , M Abreu Di-Berardino , P Moreno-Nunez , J Vicente-Guijarro , J.M Aranaz-Andrés
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2病毒对医院环境的生物污染","authors":"M Espejo Mambié , D San Jose-Saras , C Bischofberger Valdés , C Díaz-Agero Pérez , JC Galán Montemayor , L Martínez-García , M Abreu Di-Berardino , P Moreno-Nunez , J Vicente-Guijarro , J.M Aranaz-Andrés","doi":"10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Demonstrating the capability to isolate biological material from the environment was fundamental to supporting any transmission route. Various and inconsistent methodologies have been used to address this issue; however, the debate in scientific societies about the possibility of airborne transmission as a source of SARS-CoV-2 spread remained open.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the air and on surfaces in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study involved air and surface sampling in the emergency, hospitalization, and intensive care unit areas of the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital. A consistent methodology was used for all samples, and clinical and environmental parameters and characterization of each location were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 234 samples were collected, comprising 160 surface samples and 74 air samples, of which 6.84 % tested positive (13/160 surface samples and 3/74 air samples). High-contact surfaces had the highest proportion of positive samples (12/13). All positive air samples were identified within 2 m of patients who had recently developed symptoms (<5 days). High dependency and elevated temperatures seemed to indicate a higher risk of environmental biocontamination. Additionally, there was a higher risk of contamination in the intensive care units than in the hospitalization or emergency units.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34305,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental biocontamination by SARS-CoV-2 Virus in the hospital setting\",\"authors\":\"M Espejo Mambié , D San Jose-Saras , C Bischofberger Valdés , C Díaz-Agero Pérez , JC Galán Montemayor , L Martínez-García , M Abreu Di-Berardino , P Moreno-Nunez , J Vicente-Guijarro , J.M Aranaz-Andrés\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Demonstrating the capability to isolate biological material from the environment was fundamental to supporting any transmission route. Various and inconsistent methodologies have been used to address this issue; however, the debate in scientific societies about the possibility of airborne transmission as a source of SARS-CoV-2 spread remained open.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the air and on surfaces in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study involved air and surface sampling in the emergency, hospitalization, and intensive care unit areas of the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital. A consistent methodology was used for all samples, and clinical and environmental parameters and characterization of each location were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 234 samples were collected, comprising 160 surface samples and 74 air samples, of which 6.84 % tested positive (13/160 surface samples and 3/74 air samples). High-contact surfaces had the highest proportion of positive samples (12/13). All positive air samples were identified within 2 m of patients who had recently developed symptoms (<5 days). High dependency and elevated temperatures seemed to indicate a higher risk of environmental biocontamination. Additionally, there was a higher risk of contamination in the intensive care units than in the hospitalization or emergency units.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Microbial Sciences\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Microbial Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666517425000173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666517425000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
证明从环境中分离生物材料的能力是支持任何传播途径的基础。已经使用了各种不一致的方法来解决这个问题;然而,科学界关于空气传播作为SARS-CoV-2传播来源的可能性的争论仍然存在。目的分析2019冠状病毒病大流行期间医院空气和表面的SARS-CoV-2污染情况。方法本研究采用Ramón y Cajal大学医院急诊、住院和重症监护病房区域的空气和地面采样。对所有样本采用一致的方法,记录临床和环境参数以及每个位置的特征。结果共采集标本234份,其中地表标本160份,空气标本74份,阳性率6.84%(地表标本13/160,空气标本3/74)。高接触面阳性样品比例最高(12/13)。所有阳性空气样本均在最近出现症状(5天)的患者2米范围内确定。高度依赖和高温似乎表明环境生物污染的风险更高。此外,重症监护病房的污染风险高于住院或急诊病房。
Environmental biocontamination by SARS-CoV-2 Virus in the hospital setting
Background
Demonstrating the capability to isolate biological material from the environment was fundamental to supporting any transmission route. Various and inconsistent methodologies have been used to address this issue; however, the debate in scientific societies about the possibility of airborne transmission as a source of SARS-CoV-2 spread remained open.
Objective
To analyze SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the air and on surfaces in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
This study involved air and surface sampling in the emergency, hospitalization, and intensive care unit areas of the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital. A consistent methodology was used for all samples, and clinical and environmental parameters and characterization of each location were recorded.
Results
A total of 234 samples were collected, comprising 160 surface samples and 74 air samples, of which 6.84 % tested positive (13/160 surface samples and 3/74 air samples). High-contact surfaces had the highest proportion of positive samples (12/13). All positive air samples were identified within 2 m of patients who had recently developed symptoms (<5 days). High dependency and elevated temperatures seemed to indicate a higher risk of environmental biocontamination. Additionally, there was a higher risk of contamination in the intensive care units than in the hospitalization or emergency units.