不同人工智能方法在混凝土抗压强度预测中的比较应用

Mouhamadou Amar
{"title":"不同人工智能方法在混凝土抗压强度预测中的比较应用","authors":"Mouhamadou Amar","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2025.100299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concrete mix design requires specialized knowledge and techniques for characterization. However, this process is time-consuming, and the mechanical properties, such as strength, can vary due to factors like cement type, water content, aggregates, and curing time. Additionally, analytical mathematical models are often used to estimate concrete characteristics. However, accurately determining concrete properties without laboratory testing is challenging, especially when nontraditional materials, such as certain supplementary cementitious materials, are involved. Recently, artificial intelligence has become a powerful resource that enables machine learning-based forecasting using available data. This study utilized RapidMiner® software to design models capable of analyzing various types of tagged data and performing machine learning predictions. These models were applied to over 5,373 concrete formulations compiled from 137 literature sources. The simulations used artificial neural networks or deep learning, generalized linear, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient-boosted tree models to predict the compressive strength of 8 concrete mix designs containing different SCMs. The accuracy of models was estimated using traditional statistical indices such as R<sup>2</sup>, MAPE and RMSE. The most accurate model was found to be a gradient-boosted tree followed by deep learning and random forest. Forecasts were validated with high accuracy by comparing experimental results to numerical data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative use of different AI methods for the prediction of concrete compressive strength\",\"authors\":\"Mouhamadou Amar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clema.2025.100299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Concrete mix design requires specialized knowledge and techniques for characterization. However, this process is time-consuming, and the mechanical properties, such as strength, can vary due to factors like cement type, water content, aggregates, and curing time. Additionally, analytical mathematical models are often used to estimate concrete characteristics. However, accurately determining concrete properties without laboratory testing is challenging, especially when nontraditional materials, such as certain supplementary cementitious materials, are involved. Recently, artificial intelligence has become a powerful resource that enables machine learning-based forecasting using available data. This study utilized RapidMiner® software to design models capable of analyzing various types of tagged data and performing machine learning predictions. These models were applied to over 5,373 concrete formulations compiled from 137 literature sources. The simulations used artificial neural networks or deep learning, generalized linear, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient-boosted tree models to predict the compressive strength of 8 concrete mix designs containing different SCMs. The accuracy of models was estimated using traditional statistical indices such as R<sup>2</sup>, MAPE and RMSE. The most accurate model was found to be a gradient-boosted tree followed by deep learning and random forest. Forecasts were validated with high accuracy by comparing experimental results to numerical data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Materials\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397625000085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397625000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土配合比设计需要专门的知识和表征技术。然而,这一过程非常耗时,而且强度等机械性能会因水泥类型、含水量、骨料和养护时间等因素而有所不同。此外,分析数学模型经常用于估计具体的特性。然而,在没有实验室测试的情况下准确地确定混凝土的性能是具有挑战性的,特别是当涉及非传统材料(如某些补充胶凝材料)时。最近,人工智能已经成为一种强大的资源,可以使用可用数据进行基于机器学习的预测。本研究利用RapidMiner®软件设计能够分析各种类型标记数据并执行机器学习预测的模型。这些模型被应用于来自137个文献来源的5,373多个具体配方。模拟使用人工神经网络或深度学习、广义线性、决策树、随机森林、支持向量机和梯度增强树模型来预测包含不同SCMs的8种混凝土配合比设计的抗压强度。采用R2、MAPE、RMSE等传统统计指标对模型的精度进行估计。最准确的模型是梯度增强树,其次是深度学习和随机森林。通过实验结果与数值数据的比较,验证了预报的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative use of different AI methods for the prediction of concrete compressive strength

Comparative use of different AI methods for the prediction of concrete compressive strength
Concrete mix design requires specialized knowledge and techniques for characterization. However, this process is time-consuming, and the mechanical properties, such as strength, can vary due to factors like cement type, water content, aggregates, and curing time. Additionally, analytical mathematical models are often used to estimate concrete characteristics. However, accurately determining concrete properties without laboratory testing is challenging, especially when nontraditional materials, such as certain supplementary cementitious materials, are involved. Recently, artificial intelligence has become a powerful resource that enables machine learning-based forecasting using available data. This study utilized RapidMiner® software to design models capable of analyzing various types of tagged data and performing machine learning predictions. These models were applied to over 5,373 concrete formulations compiled from 137 literature sources. The simulations used artificial neural networks or deep learning, generalized linear, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient-boosted tree models to predict the compressive strength of 8 concrete mix designs containing different SCMs. The accuracy of models was estimated using traditional statistical indices such as R2, MAPE and RMSE. The most accurate model was found to be a gradient-boosted tree followed by deep learning and random forest. Forecasts were validated with high accuracy by comparing experimental results to numerical data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信