马尾松混交林在提高南方退化林土壤碳储量中的重要作用

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fenghua Tang , Yunchao Zhou , Jian Feng , Jiaohong Li , Jirong Feng , Yanchao Lv , Yuexiong Mao , Yaoxiong Wang , Piaoyun Deng , Yunxing Bai
{"title":"马尾松混交林在提高南方退化林土壤碳储量中的重要作用","authors":"Fenghua Tang ,&nbsp;Yunchao Zhou ,&nbsp;Jian Feng ,&nbsp;Jiaohong Li ,&nbsp;Jirong Feng ,&nbsp;Yanchao Lv ,&nbsp;Yuexiong Mao ,&nbsp;Yaoxiong Wang ,&nbsp;Piaoyun Deng ,&nbsp;Yunxing Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest degradation, including low-function forest (LFF), native forest destruction or transformation (NFDT), and subsequent soil erosion (SE), has occurred. Historically, single-species plantations rather than mixed forests have been used to offset forest losses. However, the important role of <em>Pinus massoniana</em> mixed forests (PMFs) at degraded sites in enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in southern China remains untested. Our meta-analysis included 1840 paired observations from 136 studies. The results demonstrated that converting <em>P. massoniana</em> pure forests (PPFs) to PMFs at degraded sites increased SOC stocks (0–100 cm) by 46.55%, which was 7.03 times greater than that at nondegraded sites. The PMFs at the SE sites sequestered significantly higher SOC stocks (2.40 and 4.35 times) than did those at the LFF and NFDT sites. At the LFF and SE sites, SOC stock increases were attributed to significant increases in litter biomass, root biomass, tree biomass, and tree OC stock. At the SE sites, converting bare lands to PMFs increased SOC stocks (0–100 cm) by 274.30%. At the NFDT sites, converting natural evergreen broadleaved forests (NEBFs) to PPFs significantly decreased the SOC stocks. However, SOC stocks remained unchanged after the conversion of NEBFs to PMFs. At the NFDT sites, the conversion of PPFs to PMFs increased SOC stocks by significantly increasing the contribution of soil microbial residue accumulation and microbial residue-carbon to SOC. The transformation of NEBFs into PMFs and PPFs significantly reduced soil microbial residue retention and microbial residue-carbon. Nevertheless, only PPFs significantly decreased the proportion of microbial residues in SOC to reduce SOC stocks. Together, transforming PPFs to PMFs in degraded areas significantly enhances SOC stocks but needs plant species richness not exceeding 20. Thus, PMF cannot replace NEBF, and NEBF requires adequate protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 108792"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Important role of Pinus massoniana mixed forests in enhancing soil carbon stocks in degraded forests in southern China\",\"authors\":\"Fenghua Tang ,&nbsp;Yunchao Zhou ,&nbsp;Jian Feng ,&nbsp;Jiaohong Li ,&nbsp;Jirong Feng ,&nbsp;Yanchao Lv ,&nbsp;Yuexiong Mao ,&nbsp;Yaoxiong Wang ,&nbsp;Piaoyun Deng ,&nbsp;Yunxing Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forest degradation, including low-function forest (LFF), native forest destruction or transformation (NFDT), and subsequent soil erosion (SE), has occurred. Historically, single-species plantations rather than mixed forests have been used to offset forest losses. However, the important role of <em>Pinus massoniana</em> mixed forests (PMFs) at degraded sites in enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in southern China remains untested. Our meta-analysis included 1840 paired observations from 136 studies. The results demonstrated that converting <em>P. massoniana</em> pure forests (PPFs) to PMFs at degraded sites increased SOC stocks (0–100 cm) by 46.55%, which was 7.03 times greater than that at nondegraded sites. The PMFs at the SE sites sequestered significantly higher SOC stocks (2.40 and 4.35 times) than did those at the LFF and NFDT sites. At the LFF and SE sites, SOC stock increases were attributed to significant increases in litter biomass, root biomass, tree biomass, and tree OC stock. At the SE sites, converting bare lands to PMFs increased SOC stocks (0–100 cm) by 274.30%. At the NFDT sites, converting natural evergreen broadleaved forests (NEBFs) to PPFs significantly decreased the SOC stocks. However, SOC stocks remained unchanged after the conversion of NEBFs to PMFs. At the NFDT sites, the conversion of PPFs to PMFs increased SOC stocks by significantly increasing the contribution of soil microbial residue accumulation and microbial residue-carbon to SOC. The transformation of NEBFs into PMFs and PPFs significantly reduced soil microbial residue retention and microbial residue-carbon. Nevertheless, only PPFs significantly decreased the proportion of microbial residues in SOC to reduce SOC stocks. Together, transforming PPFs to PMFs in degraded areas significantly enhances SOC stocks but needs plant species richness not exceeding 20. Thus, PMF cannot replace NEBF, and NEBF requires adequate protection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":\"250 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225000943\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225000943","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林退化,包括低功能林(LFF)、原生林破坏或转化(NFDT)以及随后的土壤侵蚀(SE)已经发生。历史上,单一物种人工林而不是混交林被用来抵消森林损失。然而,马尾松混交林(PMFs)在南方退化地提高土壤有机碳(SOC)储量中的重要作用尚未得到验证。我们的荟萃分析包括来自136项研究的1840对观察结果。结果表明:退化样地马尾松原生林(PPFs)向PMFs转化后,0 ~ 100 cm土壤有机碳储量增加46.55%,是未退化样地的7.03倍;与LFF和NFDT样地相比,SE样地的PMFs固碳量显著增加(分别为2.40和4.35倍)。在LFF和SE样地,土壤有机碳储量的增加主要归因于凋落物生物量、根系生物量、树木生物量和树木OC储量的显著增加。在东南样地,将裸地转化为PMFs使土壤有机碳储量(0-100 cm)增加了274.30%。在NFDT样地,将天然常绿阔叶林(NEBFs)转化为PPFs显著降低了SOC储量。然而,在NEBFs转换为PMFs后,SOC库存保持不变。在NFDT样地,PPFs向PMFs的转化通过显著增加土壤微生物残馀积累和微生物残馀碳对有机碳的贡献增加了土壤有机碳储量。NEBFs向PMFs和PPFs的转化显著降低了土壤微生物残馀量和微生物残馀碳。然而,只有PPFs显著降低了有机碳中微生物残留的比例,从而降低了有机碳储量。综上所示,退化地区ppf向PMFs的转化显著增加了有机碳储量,但需要的植物物种丰富度不超过20种。因此,PMF不能取代NEBF,而NEBF需要足够的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Important role of Pinus massoniana mixed forests in enhancing soil carbon stocks in degraded forests in southern China

Important role of Pinus massoniana mixed forests in enhancing soil carbon stocks in degraded forests in southern China
Forest degradation, including low-function forest (LFF), native forest destruction or transformation (NFDT), and subsequent soil erosion (SE), has occurred. Historically, single-species plantations rather than mixed forests have been used to offset forest losses. However, the important role of Pinus massoniana mixed forests (PMFs) at degraded sites in enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in southern China remains untested. Our meta-analysis included 1840 paired observations from 136 studies. The results demonstrated that converting P. massoniana pure forests (PPFs) to PMFs at degraded sites increased SOC stocks (0–100 cm) by 46.55%, which was 7.03 times greater than that at nondegraded sites. The PMFs at the SE sites sequestered significantly higher SOC stocks (2.40 and 4.35 times) than did those at the LFF and NFDT sites. At the LFF and SE sites, SOC stock increases were attributed to significant increases in litter biomass, root biomass, tree biomass, and tree OC stock. At the SE sites, converting bare lands to PMFs increased SOC stocks (0–100 cm) by 274.30%. At the NFDT sites, converting natural evergreen broadleaved forests (NEBFs) to PPFs significantly decreased the SOC stocks. However, SOC stocks remained unchanged after the conversion of NEBFs to PMFs. At the NFDT sites, the conversion of PPFs to PMFs increased SOC stocks by significantly increasing the contribution of soil microbial residue accumulation and microbial residue-carbon to SOC. The transformation of NEBFs into PMFs and PPFs significantly reduced soil microbial residue retention and microbial residue-carbon. Nevertheless, only PPFs significantly decreased the proportion of microbial residues in SOC to reduce SOC stocks. Together, transforming PPFs to PMFs in degraded areas significantly enhances SOC stocks but needs plant species richness not exceeding 20. Thus, PMF cannot replace NEBF, and NEBF requires adequate protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信