森林火灾和气候变化对黑松林矿质土的大部分性质没有显著影响

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Renato S. Pacaldo , Mirac Aydin , Randell Keith Amarille
{"title":"森林火灾和气候变化对黑松林矿质土的大部分性质没有显著影响","authors":"Renato S. Pacaldo ,&nbsp;Mirac Aydin ,&nbsp;Randell Keith Amarille","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest fires and aspects strongly influence soil’s physical and chemical properties. Despite many studies on wildfire impacts on soil properties, the interaction effects of multiple factors affecting soil properties and soil carbon in post-fire areas need a better understanding. This study addresses a critical question of whether and to what extent surface fire, crown fire, aspects, and combination of these factors affect soil’s physical and chemical properties and soil organic carbon of a post-fire <em>Pinus nigra</em> forest ecosystem. We established a field experiment in a four-year-old post-fire <em>P. nigra</em> forest using a two-way factorial randomized complete block design with four replications. Results revealed that most soil mineral physical and chemical properties exhibited no significant differences except pH, Cu, K, and Na. The pH and N also significantly decreased with soil depth. The surface soil organic matter (SOM) exhibited significant differences among types of forest fire and combined forest fire types and aspects. Depending on forest fire types and aspects, the post-fire sites recovered 20 % to 52 % of the lost SOM four years after the fire. Our results suggest that forest fires do not necessarily cause long-term detrimental effects on soil mineral nutrients and organic carbon. The north-facing slope post-fire areas exhibited a higher recovery rate than the south-facing slope, indicating that post-fire management and rehabilitation should prioritize the crown-fire, south-facing slopes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 108801"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest fire and aspects showed no significant effects on most mineral soil properties of black pine forests\",\"authors\":\"Renato S. Pacaldo ,&nbsp;Mirac Aydin ,&nbsp;Randell Keith Amarille\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2025.108801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forest fires and aspects strongly influence soil’s physical and chemical properties. Despite many studies on wildfire impacts on soil properties, the interaction effects of multiple factors affecting soil properties and soil carbon in post-fire areas need a better understanding. This study addresses a critical question of whether and to what extent surface fire, crown fire, aspects, and combination of these factors affect soil’s physical and chemical properties and soil organic carbon of a post-fire <em>Pinus nigra</em> forest ecosystem. We established a field experiment in a four-year-old post-fire <em>P. nigra</em> forest using a two-way factorial randomized complete block design with four replications. Results revealed that most soil mineral physical and chemical properties exhibited no significant differences except pH, Cu, K, and Na. The pH and N also significantly decreased with soil depth. The surface soil organic matter (SOM) exhibited significant differences among types of forest fire and combined forest fire types and aspects. Depending on forest fire types and aspects, the post-fire sites recovered 20 % to 52 % of the lost SOM four years after the fire. Our results suggest that forest fires do not necessarily cause long-term detrimental effects on soil mineral nutrients and organic carbon. The north-facing slope post-fire areas exhibited a higher recovery rate than the south-facing slope, indicating that post-fire management and rehabilitation should prioritize the crown-fire, south-facing slopes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":\"250 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225001031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225001031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林火灾和其他因素对土壤的物理和化学性质影响很大。尽管野火对土壤性质影响的研究较多,但影响火灾后地区土壤性质和土壤碳的多种因素的交互作用还有待进一步了解。本研究解决了一个关键问题,即地表火、树冠火、这些因素的方面和组合是否以及在多大程度上影响火灾后黑松林生态系统土壤的物理化学性质和土壤有机碳。本研究采用双因子随机完全区组设计,在4个重复的4年生黑桫树林中进行了野外试验。结果表明,除pH、Cu、K、Na外,其余土壤矿物理化性质均无显著差异。pH和N也随土壤深度的增加而显著降低。表层土壤有机质(SOM)在林火类型和复合林火类型和方面之间存在显著差异。根据森林火灾的类型和方面,火灾后的地点在火灾发生四年后恢复了20%至52%的损失SOM。我们的研究结果表明,森林火灾不一定会对土壤矿质养分和有机碳造成长期的有害影响。北坡火灾后的恢复率高于南坡,表明火灾后的管理和恢复应优先考虑南坡的顶火。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Forest fire and aspects showed no significant effects on most mineral soil properties of black pine forests

Forest fire and aspects showed no significant effects on most mineral soil properties of black pine forests
Forest fires and aspects strongly influence soil’s physical and chemical properties. Despite many studies on wildfire impacts on soil properties, the interaction effects of multiple factors affecting soil properties and soil carbon in post-fire areas need a better understanding. This study addresses a critical question of whether and to what extent surface fire, crown fire, aspects, and combination of these factors affect soil’s physical and chemical properties and soil organic carbon of a post-fire Pinus nigra forest ecosystem. We established a field experiment in a four-year-old post-fire P. nigra forest using a two-way factorial randomized complete block design with four replications. Results revealed that most soil mineral physical and chemical properties exhibited no significant differences except pH, Cu, K, and Na. The pH and N also significantly decreased with soil depth. The surface soil organic matter (SOM) exhibited significant differences among types of forest fire and combined forest fire types and aspects. Depending on forest fire types and aspects, the post-fire sites recovered 20 % to 52 % of the lost SOM four years after the fire. Our results suggest that forest fires do not necessarily cause long-term detrimental effects on soil mineral nutrients and organic carbon. The north-facing slope post-fire areas exhibited a higher recovery rate than the south-facing slope, indicating that post-fire management and rehabilitation should prioritize the crown-fire, south-facing slopes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信