Tacianne Rolemberg Braga Delamain, José Henrique Herrmann Delamain, Sergio Luiz Navarro Braga, Ricardo Costa, Dimytri Alexandre Alvim de Siqueira, Fausto Feres, Marinella Patrizia Centemero
{"title":"Outcomes of Guideline-Recommended Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women with Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.","authors":"Tacianne Rolemberg Braga Delamain, José Henrique Herrmann Delamain, Sergio Luiz Navarro Braga, Ricardo Costa, Dimytri Alexandre Alvim de Siqueira, Fausto Feres, Marinella Patrizia Centemero","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown that women with coronary artery disease (CAD) are less likely to undergo angiography and have less favorable outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the outcomes of women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable CAD (lesion>50%) treated with contemporary PCI using DES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, longitudinal cohort study with prospective follow-up included all female patients ≥ 18 years admitted at a tertiary public cardiovascular center in Brazil from January 2019 to December 2020. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1146 women (average age 65 years) underwent guideline-recommended PCI. Risk factors were frequent (hypertension: 88%, dyslipidemia: 85%, diabetes: 47.5%), and 69% were admitted due to ACS. Radial access was used in 59% of patients; 1516 vessels were treated with 1725 stents implanted (1.5 stents/patient). PCI was successful in 97.7%, in-hospital death occurred in 1.2%, peri-procedural MI in 3.6%, and TIA in 0.4%. Predictors of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE): previous stroke (OR: 2.97; CI: 1.06-7.15; p= 0.023), CKD (OR: 3.11; CI: 1.49-6.20; p= 0.002), and at least one procedural failure during PCI (OR: 10.2; CI: 1.17-5.9; p<0.001). The average follow-up was 576.2 days in 1047 patients. All-cause mortality occurred in 5.3%, cardiac death in 3.5%, recurrent ACS in 8%, and additional revascularization procedures in 5.5%. The predictors for MACCE during FU were hospital admission for ACS for the index PCI (OR: 1.58; HR: 1.06-2.35; p=0.023) and the presence of MACCE during hospitalization (OR: 6.66; HR: 2.42- 18.3; p< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pioneering study involving 1146 patients treated by contemporary PCI and followed for almost 2 years, we obtained very encouraging in-hospital and mid-term results.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 1","pages":"e20240249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究表明,患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的女性接受血管造影术的可能性较低,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的疗效也较差:先前的研究表明,患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的女性接受血管造影术的可能性较低,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的疗效也较差:评估患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和稳定型CAD(病变>50%)的女性患者在使用DES进行现代PCI治疗后的预后:观察性纵向队列研究,前瞻性随访,纳入2019年1月至2020年12月期间巴西一家三级公立心血管中心收治的所有≥18岁的女性患者。统计分析采用的显著性水平为5%:1146名女性(平均年龄65岁)接受了指南推荐的PCI治疗。风险因素较多(高血压:88%;血脂异常:85%;糖尿病:47.5%),69%因急性心肌梗死入院。59%的患者采用桡动脉入路;共治疗了1516条血管,植入了1725枚支架(每名患者1.5枚支架)。97.7%的患者PCI成功,1.2%的患者发生院内死亡,3.6%的患者发生围手术期心肌梗死,0.4%的患者发生TIA。院内主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的预测因素包括:既往中风(OR:2.97;CI:1.06-7.15;P= 0.023)、慢性肾脏病(OR:3.11;CI:1.49-6.20;P= 0.002)、PCI 过程中至少一次手术失败(OR:10.2;CI:1.17-5.9;P):在这项开创性的研究中,有1146名患者接受了现代PCI治疗,并接受了近两年的随访,我们获得了非常令人鼓舞的院内和中期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Guideline-Recommended Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women with Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Background: Previous studies have shown that women with coronary artery disease (CAD) are less likely to undergo angiography and have less favorable outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objectives: Assess the outcomes of women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable CAD (lesion>50%) treated with contemporary PCI using DES.

Methods: Observational, longitudinal cohort study with prospective follow-up included all female patients ≥ 18 years admitted at a tertiary public cardiovascular center in Brazil from January 2019 to December 2020. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%.

Results: 1146 women (average age 65 years) underwent guideline-recommended PCI. Risk factors were frequent (hypertension: 88%, dyslipidemia: 85%, diabetes: 47.5%), and 69% were admitted due to ACS. Radial access was used in 59% of patients; 1516 vessels were treated with 1725 stents implanted (1.5 stents/patient). PCI was successful in 97.7%, in-hospital death occurred in 1.2%, peri-procedural MI in 3.6%, and TIA in 0.4%. Predictors of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE): previous stroke (OR: 2.97; CI: 1.06-7.15; p= 0.023), CKD (OR: 3.11; CI: 1.49-6.20; p= 0.002), and at least one procedural failure during PCI (OR: 10.2; CI: 1.17-5.9; p<0.001). The average follow-up was 576.2 days in 1047 patients. All-cause mortality occurred in 5.3%, cardiac death in 3.5%, recurrent ACS in 8%, and additional revascularization procedures in 5.5%. The predictors for MACCE during FU were hospital admission for ACS for the index PCI (OR: 1.58; HR: 1.06-2.35; p=0.023) and the presence of MACCE during hospitalization (OR: 6.66; HR: 2.42- 18.3; p< 0.001).

Conclusion: In this pioneering study involving 1146 patients treated by contemporary PCI and followed for almost 2 years, we obtained very encouraging in-hospital and mid-term results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信