利用sFlt-1/PlGF比值预测妊娠期糖尿病子痫前期

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sarah Brittany Noonan, Shaun Patrick Brennecke, Gabriel Davis Jones
{"title":"利用sFlt-1/PlGF比值预测妊娠期糖尿病子痫前期","authors":"Sarah Brittany Noonan, Shaun Patrick Brennecke, Gabriel Davis Jones","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio blood test can aid the prediction of preeclampsia (PE) in advance of a clinical diagnosis. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) predisposes to PE, but may influence levels of these biomarkers independently of PE.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio retains its clinical utility to predict PE in patients with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and associated clinical outcome data acquired between September 2016 and September 2022, at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 1416 sFlt-1/PlGF ratio results from pregnant women with and without GDM, and with and without PE were analysed. The main outcome measures were sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test results in relation to PE and GDM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value (NPV) between the PE + No GDM and PE + GDM groups in both the 0 to 7 and the 8 to 14 days before delivery categories. In the 0- to 7-day category the PE + No GDM group had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), sensitivity of 85.3% (95% CI 80.8-89.1%) and NPV of 92.7% (95% CI 90.5-94.5%), and the PE + GDM group had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.93), sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI 76.9-96.5%), and NPV of 94.8% (95% CI 88.7-97.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this investigation indicate that although GDM may lead to changes in the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test retains its clinical utility in predicting PE onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e3343-e3352"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Preeclampsia in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Brittany Noonan, Shaun Patrick Brennecke, Gabriel Davis Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio blood test can aid the prediction of preeclampsia (PE) in advance of a clinical diagnosis. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) predisposes to PE, but may influence levels of these biomarkers independently of PE.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio retains its clinical utility to predict PE in patients with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and associated clinical outcome data acquired between September 2016 and September 2022, at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 1416 sFlt-1/PlGF ratio results from pregnant women with and without GDM, and with and without PE were analysed. The main outcome measures were sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test results in relation to PE and GDM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value (NPV) between the PE + No GDM and PE + GDM groups in both the 0 to 7 and the 8 to 14 days before delivery categories. In the 0- to 7-day category the PE + No GDM group had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), sensitivity of 85.3% (95% CI 80.8-89.1%) and NPV of 92.7% (95% CI 90.5-94.5%), and the PE + GDM group had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.93), sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI 76.9-96.5%), and NPV of 94.8% (95% CI 88.7-97.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this investigation indicate that although GDM may lead to changes in the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test retains its clinical utility in predicting PE onset.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e3343-e3352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:sFlt-1/PlGF比值血液检测有助于在临床诊断前预测子痫前期(PE)。妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)易患PE,但可能独立于PE影响这些生物标志物的水平。目的:确定sFlt-1/PlGF比值在预测GDM患者PE方面是否仍具有临床应用价值。设计:回顾性分析2016年9月至2022年9月期间获得的sFlt-1/PlGF比率和相关临床结局数据。地点:澳大利亚墨尔本皇家妇女医院。患者:1416例sFlt-1/PlGF比值来自有或没有GDM,有或没有PE的孕妇,转至sFlt-1/PlGF检测。干预:N / A。主要观察指标:sFlt-1、PlGF及sFlt-1/PlGF比值检测结果与PE和GDM的关系。结果:分娩前0-7天和8-14天PE + no GDM组与PE + GDM组的AUC、特异性、敏感性、PPV和NPV均无显著差异。在0-7天内,PE + No GDM组的AUC为0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.87),敏感性为85.3% (95% CI: 80.8% - 89.1%), NPV为92.7% (95% CI: 90.5% - 94.5%), PE + GDM组的AUC为0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93),敏感性为89.4% (95% CI: 76.9% - 96.5%), NPV为94.8% (95% CI: 88.7% - 97.7%)。结论:本研究结果表明,虽然GDM可能导致sFlt-1/PlGF比值的变化,但sFlt-1/PlGF比值试验在预测PE发病方面仍具有临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Preeclampsia in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio.

Context: The soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio blood test can aid the prediction of preeclampsia (PE) in advance of a clinical diagnosis. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) predisposes to PE, but may influence levels of these biomarkers independently of PE.

Objective: To determine whether the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio retains its clinical utility to predict PE in patients with GDM.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and associated clinical outcome data acquired between September 2016 and September 2022, at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 1416 sFlt-1/PlGF ratio results from pregnant women with and without GDM, and with and without PE were analysed. The main outcome measures were sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test results in relation to PE and GDM.

Results: There were no significant differences in the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value (NPV) between the PE + No GDM and PE + GDM groups in both the 0 to 7 and the 8 to 14 days before delivery categories. In the 0- to 7-day category the PE + No GDM group had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), sensitivity of 85.3% (95% CI 80.8-89.1%) and NPV of 92.7% (95% CI 90.5-94.5%), and the PE + GDM group had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.93), sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI 76.9-96.5%), and NPV of 94.8% (95% CI 88.7-97.7%).

Conclusion: The results of this investigation indicate that although GDM may lead to changes in the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test retains its clinical utility in predicting PE onset.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信