评估癌症晚期患者和护理人员对自我指导、自我管理干预措施的接受程度。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sydney Wasserman, Lydia Ould Brahim, Andrea Maria Laizner, Anita Mehta, José Côté, Melissa Henry, Kimberly Thibodeau, Vasiliki Bessy Bitzas, Sylvie D Lambert
{"title":"评估癌症晚期患者和护理人员对自我指导、自我管理干预措施的接受程度。","authors":"Sydney Wasserman, Lydia Ould Brahim, Andrea Maria Laizner, Anita Mehta, José Côté, Melissa Henry, Kimberly Thibodeau, Vasiliki Bessy Bitzas, Sylvie D Lambert","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Coping-Together is a self-directed, self-management intervention initially developed for patients in early-stages of cancer and their caregivers. This study evaluated its acceptability among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six participants (patients with advanced cancer <i>n</i> = 15 and their caregivers <i>n</i> = 11) were given the Coping-Together materials (6 booklets and a workbook) for 7 weeks. Participants were interviewed twice during this time to solicit feedback on the intervention's content, design, and recommended changes. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found Coping-Together was mostly relevant. All (<i>n</i> = 26, 100%) participants expressed interest and a desire to improve their self-management skills. Perceived benefits included learning to develop SMARTTER (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, timely, and done together) self-management plans, normalizing challenges, and enhancing communication within the dyad and with their healthcare team. Most (<i>n</i> = 25, 96%) identified strategies from the booklets that benefited them. Top strategies learned were skills to manage physical health (<i>n</i> = 20, 77%) (e.g., monitoring symptoms), emotional well-being (<i>n</i> = 21, 81%) (e.g., reducing stress by reframing thoughts), as well as social well-being (<i>n</i> = 24, 92%) (e.g., communicating with their healthcare team). Barriers included illness severity and time constraints. The unique advanced cancer needs that are to be integrated include support related to fear of death, uncertainty, palliative care and advanced care planning. Suggested modifications involved enhancing accessibility and including more advanced cancer information (e.g., end-of-life planning, comfort care, resources).</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Participants reported several benefits from using Coping-Together, with minimal adaptations needed. Creating SMARTTER self-management plans helped them implement self-management strategies. Specific areas for improvement addressed the need for improved accessibility and more content related to advanced cancer. Findings demonstrate how Coping-Together is acceptable for those living with advanced cancer and their caregivers, offering much of the support needed to enhance day-to-day quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney Wasserman, Lydia Ould Brahim, Andrea Maria Laizner, Anita Mehta, José Côté, Melissa Henry, Kimberly Thibodeau, Vasiliki Bessy Bitzas, Sylvie D Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951524001755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Coping-Together is a self-directed, self-management intervention initially developed for patients in early-stages of cancer and their caregivers. This study evaluated its acceptability among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six participants (patients with advanced cancer <i>n</i> = 15 and their caregivers <i>n</i> = 11) were given the Coping-Together materials (6 booklets and a workbook) for 7 weeks. Participants were interviewed twice during this time to solicit feedback on the intervention's content, design, and recommended changes. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found Coping-Together was mostly relevant. All (<i>n</i> = 26, 100%) participants expressed interest and a desire to improve their self-management skills. Perceived benefits included learning to develop SMARTTER (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, timely, and done together) self-management plans, normalizing challenges, and enhancing communication within the dyad and with their healthcare team. Most (<i>n</i> = 25, 96%) identified strategies from the booklets that benefited them. Top strategies learned were skills to manage physical health (<i>n</i> = 20, 77%) (e.g., monitoring symptoms), emotional well-being (<i>n</i> = 21, 81%) (e.g., reducing stress by reframing thoughts), as well as social well-being (<i>n</i> = 24, 92%) (e.g., communicating with their healthcare team). Barriers included illness severity and time constraints. The unique advanced cancer needs that are to be integrated include support related to fear of death, uncertainty, palliative care and advanced care planning. Suggested modifications involved enhancing accessibility and including more advanced cancer information (e.g., end-of-life planning, comfort care, resources).</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Participants reported several benefits from using Coping-Together, with minimal adaptations needed. Creating SMARTTER self-management plans helped them implement self-management strategies. Specific areas for improvement addressed the need for improved accessibility and more content related to advanced cancer. Findings demonstrate how Coping-Together is acceptable for those living with advanced cancer and their caregivers, offering much of the support needed to enhance day-to-day quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001755\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:共同应对是一种自我导向、自我管理的干预措施,最初是为早期癌症患者及其护理人员开发的。本研究评估了晚期癌症患者及其护理人员的可接受性。方法:26名参与者(晚期癌症患者15名及其护理人员11名)分别给予6本小册子和1本练习册,为期7周。在此期间,参与者接受了两次访谈,以征求对干预内容、设计和建议更改的反馈。采访录音逐字抄录,并进行专题分析。结果:参与者发现“共同应对”是最相关的。所有(n = 26, 100%)参与者都表达了提高自我管理技能的兴趣和愿望。感知到的好处包括学习制定SMARTTER(具体的、可衡量的、可实现的、相关的、及时的、一起完成的)自我管理计划,使挑战正常化,并加强夫妻之间及其医疗团队之间的沟通。大多数(n = 25,96%)从小册子中确定了使他们受益的策略。学习到的最重要的策略是管理身体健康(n = 20, 77%)(例如,监测症状)、情绪健康(n = 21, 81%)(例如,通过重新构建思想来减轻压力)以及社会健康(n = 24, 92%)(例如,与医疗团队沟通)的技能。障碍包括疾病严重程度和时间限制。将整合的独特晚期癌症需求包括与死亡恐惧、不确定性、姑息治疗和晚期护理计划有关的支持。建议的修改包括提高可及性,并包括更先进的癌症信息(例如,临终计划,舒适护理,资源)。结果的意义:参与者报告了使用“共同应对”的几个好处,只需要很少的调整。制定更明智的自我管理计划有助于他们实施自我管理策略。需要改进的具体领域解决了提高可访问性和更多与晚期癌症相关的内容的需求。研究结果表明,对于晚期癌症患者及其护理人员来说,“共同应对”是可以接受的,它提供了提高日常生活质量所需的许多支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer.

Objectives: Coping-Together is a self-directed, self-management intervention initially developed for patients in early-stages of cancer and their caregivers. This study evaluated its acceptability among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Methods: Twenty-six participants (patients with advanced cancer n = 15 and their caregivers n = 11) were given the Coping-Together materials (6 booklets and a workbook) for 7 weeks. Participants were interviewed twice during this time to solicit feedback on the intervention's content, design, and recommended changes. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Participants found Coping-Together was mostly relevant. All (n = 26, 100%) participants expressed interest and a desire to improve their self-management skills. Perceived benefits included learning to develop SMARTTER (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, timely, and done together) self-management plans, normalizing challenges, and enhancing communication within the dyad and with their healthcare team. Most (n = 25, 96%) identified strategies from the booklets that benefited them. Top strategies learned were skills to manage physical health (n = 20, 77%) (e.g., monitoring symptoms), emotional well-being (n = 21, 81%) (e.g., reducing stress by reframing thoughts), as well as social well-being (n = 24, 92%) (e.g., communicating with their healthcare team). Barriers included illness severity and time constraints. The unique advanced cancer needs that are to be integrated include support related to fear of death, uncertainty, palliative care and advanced care planning. Suggested modifications involved enhancing accessibility and including more advanced cancer information (e.g., end-of-life planning, comfort care, resources).

Significance of results: Participants reported several benefits from using Coping-Together, with minimal adaptations needed. Creating SMARTTER self-management plans helped them implement self-management strategies. Specific areas for improvement addressed the need for improved accessibility and more content related to advanced cancer. Findings demonstrate how Coping-Together is acceptable for those living with advanced cancer and their caregivers, offering much of the support needed to enhance day-to-day quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信