传统和 3D 打印全口义齿 PMMA 材料的理化性质和细菌粘附性:体外研究 - 第一部分。

Q3 Dentistry
Pierre Khoury, Naji Kharouf, Olivier Etienne, Jean-Philippe Dillenseger, Youssef Haikel, Hatem M El-Damanhoury, Dani Irani, Mutlu Ozcan, Ziad Salameh
{"title":"传统和 3D 打印全口义齿 PMMA 材料的理化性质和细菌粘附性:体外研究 - 第一部分。","authors":"Pierre Khoury, Naji Kharouf, Olivier Etienne, Jean-Philippe Dillenseger, Youssef Haikel, Hatem M El-Damanhoury, Dani Irani, Mutlu Ozcan, Ziad Salameh","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate and compare the surface morphology, wettability, roughness, and bacterial adhesion properties of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials fabricated by conventional methods and 3D printing for complete denture applications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two PMMA materials were investigated: Conventionally processed (ProBase Hot) and 3D-printed (3DP) (V-Print Dentbase). Surface morphology (<i>n</i> = 3) was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Surface roughness (<i>n</i> = 10) was measured using an optical profilometer. Wettability was assessed through contact angle measurements (<i>n</i> = 6) at 10, 30, and 60 seconds. Bacterial adhesion (<i>n</i> = 9) and biofilm formation (<i>n</i> = 3) were evaluated using <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) as a model organism, with quantitative bacterial counts and SEM analysis of bacterial morphology. Data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed nanoparticles on the surface of 3DP samples, while EDX detected silicon in these samples, absent in conventional PMMA. 3D-printed surfaces exhibited significantly lower roughness (1.05 ± 0.32 µm) compared to conventional surfaces (20.46 ± 6.71 µm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Contact angle measurements showed that 3DP surfaces were more hydrophilic (64-68°) than conventional surfaces (100°) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Bacterial adhesion studies demonstrated more adherent bacteria on 3DP surfaces (92.5 ± 30.8) compared to the conventional surfaces (57.6 ± 12.5), but biofilm formation was observed only on conventional surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D-printed PMMA exhibited distinct surface characteristics compared to conventionally processed PMMA, including the presence of silicon nanoparticles, lower surface roughness, and higher hydrophilicity. While 3DP surfaces showed higher initial bacterial adherence, in contrast, they appeared to inhibit biofilm formation, which highlights the complex nature of bacterial interactions with these materials.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Further clinical studies are needed to validate the results of this investigation and generate clinical translational data. How to cite this article: Khoury P, Kharouf N, Etienne O, <i>et al.</i> Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Adhesion of Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Denture PMMA Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study - Part I. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1001-1008.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 11","pages":"1001-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Adhesion of Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Denture PMMA Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study - Part I.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Khoury, Naji Kharouf, Olivier Etienne, Jean-Philippe Dillenseger, Youssef Haikel, Hatem M El-Damanhoury, Dani Irani, Mutlu Ozcan, Ziad Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate and compare the surface morphology, wettability, roughness, and bacterial adhesion properties of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials fabricated by conventional methods and 3D printing for complete denture applications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two PMMA materials were investigated: Conventionally processed (ProBase Hot) and 3D-printed (3DP) (V-Print Dentbase). Surface morphology (<i>n</i> = 3) was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Surface roughness (<i>n</i> = 10) was measured using an optical profilometer. Wettability was assessed through contact angle measurements (<i>n</i> = 6) at 10, 30, and 60 seconds. Bacterial adhesion (<i>n</i> = 9) and biofilm formation (<i>n</i> = 3) were evaluated using <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) as a model organism, with quantitative bacterial counts and SEM analysis of bacterial morphology. Data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed nanoparticles on the surface of 3DP samples, while EDX detected silicon in these samples, absent in conventional PMMA. 3D-printed surfaces exhibited significantly lower roughness (1.05 ± 0.32 µm) compared to conventional surfaces (20.46 ± 6.71 µm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Contact angle measurements showed that 3DP surfaces were more hydrophilic (64-68°) than conventional surfaces (100°) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Bacterial adhesion studies demonstrated more adherent bacteria on 3DP surfaces (92.5 ± 30.8) compared to the conventional surfaces (57.6 ± 12.5), but biofilm formation was observed only on conventional surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D-printed PMMA exhibited distinct surface characteristics compared to conventionally processed PMMA, including the presence of silicon nanoparticles, lower surface roughness, and higher hydrophilicity. While 3DP surfaces showed higher initial bacterial adherence, in contrast, they appeared to inhibit biofilm formation, which highlights the complex nature of bacterial interactions with these materials.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Further clinical studies are needed to validate the results of this investigation and generate clinical translational data. How to cite this article: Khoury P, Kharouf N, Etienne O, <i>et al.</i> Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Adhesion of Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Denture PMMA Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study - Part I. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1001-1008.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"1001-1008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较常规方法和3D打印方法制备的全口义齿用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)材料的表面形貌、润湿性、粗糙度和细菌粘附性能。材料和方法:研究了两种PMMA材料:常规加工(ProBase Hot)和3d打印(3DP) (V-Print Dentbase)。用扫描电镜(SEM)和能量色散x射线能谱(EDX)分析了n = 3的表面形貌。使用光学轮廓仪测量表面粗糙度(n = 10)。在10,30和60秒时通过接触角测量(n = 6)评估润湿性。以大肠杆菌(E. coli)为模式生物,对细菌粘附(n = 9)和生物膜形成(n = 3)进行评估,并对细菌形态进行定量计数和扫描电镜分析。对数据进行统计学分析。结果:扫描电镜分析显示,3d打印样品表面存在纳米颗粒,而EDX在这些样品中检测到硅,而传统PMMA中不存在硅。3d打印表面的粗糙度(1.05±0.32µm)明显低于传统表面(20.46±6.71µm) (p < 0.001)。接触角测量结果显示,3d打印表面的亲水性(64 ~ 68°)高于常规表面(100°)(p < 0.05)。细菌粘附研究表明,与传统表面(57.6±12.5)相比,3d打印表面(92.5±30.8)的粘附细菌更多,但仅在传统表面上观察到生物膜的形成。结论:与传统加工的PMMA相比,3d打印的PMMA具有明显的表面特征,包括硅纳米颗粒的存在,更低的表面粗糙度和更高的亲水性。相比之下,虽然3d打印表面显示出更高的初始细菌粘附性,但它们似乎抑制了生物膜的形成,这凸显了细菌与这些材料相互作用的复杂性。临床意义:需要进一步的临床研究来验证本研究的结果并产生临床转化数据。文章引用方式:Khoury P, Kharouf N, Etienne O,等。传统和3D打印全口义齿PMMA材料的物理化学特性和细菌粘附:体外研究-第一部分[J] contemporary Dent practice 2024;25(11):1001-1008。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Adhesion of Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Denture PMMA Materials: An In Vitro Study - Part I.

Aim: To evaluate and compare the surface morphology, wettability, roughness, and bacterial adhesion properties of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials fabricated by conventional methods and 3D printing for complete denture applications.

Materials and methods: Two PMMA materials were investigated: Conventionally processed (ProBase Hot) and 3D-printed (3DP) (V-Print Dentbase). Surface morphology (n = 3) was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Surface roughness (n = 10) was measured using an optical profilometer. Wettability was assessed through contact angle measurements (n = 6) at 10, 30, and 60 seconds. Bacterial adhesion (n = 9) and biofilm formation (n = 3) were evaluated using Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a model organism, with quantitative bacterial counts and SEM analysis of bacterial morphology. Data were statistically analyzed.

Results: Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed nanoparticles on the surface of 3DP samples, while EDX detected silicon in these samples, absent in conventional PMMA. 3D-printed surfaces exhibited significantly lower roughness (1.05 ± 0.32 µm) compared to conventional surfaces (20.46 ± 6.71 µm) (p < 0.001). Contact angle measurements showed that 3DP surfaces were more hydrophilic (64-68°) than conventional surfaces (100°) (p < 0.05). Bacterial adhesion studies demonstrated more adherent bacteria on 3DP surfaces (92.5 ± 30.8) compared to the conventional surfaces (57.6 ± 12.5), but biofilm formation was observed only on conventional surfaces.

Conclusion: 3D-printed PMMA exhibited distinct surface characteristics compared to conventionally processed PMMA, including the presence of silicon nanoparticles, lower surface roughness, and higher hydrophilicity. While 3DP surfaces showed higher initial bacterial adherence, in contrast, they appeared to inhibit biofilm formation, which highlights the complex nature of bacterial interactions with these materials.

Clinical significance: Further clinical studies are needed to validate the results of this investigation and generate clinical translational data. How to cite this article: Khoury P, Kharouf N, Etienne O, et al. Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Adhesion of Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Denture PMMA Materials: An In Vitro Study - Part I. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(11):1001-1008.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信