IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Jenna L Taylor, Aidan K Downs, Crystal L Danner, J Hunter Downs, Josh Donkor, Jessica I Johnston, Douglas Rozendaal, Peter L Larsen, Bruce D Johnson, Douglas T Summerfield
{"title":"Positive pressure ventilation improves oxygen saturation at altitude during recreational aviation: A pilot study.","authors":"Jenna L Taylor, Aidan K Downs, Crystal L Danner, J Hunter Downs, Josh Donkor, Jessica I Johnston, Douglas Rozendaal, Peter L Larsen, Bruce D Johnson, Douglas T Summerfield","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We investigated whether a commercial bi-level positive airway pressure (BPAP) device, would improve peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) during recreational aviation up to 12,500 feet without supplemental oxygen. Ten adults with recreational flight experience (age:47 ± 14; female = 5) completed a standardized flight profile in an unpressurised aircraft, involving randomized crossover design at 8,000 feet and 12,500 feet with BPAP or control. SpO<sub>2</sub>, middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and relative tidal volume (TV) index were measured continuously. Psychomotor vigilance test (3-min) assessed reaction time halfway through taxi and altitude stages. Altitude significantly (p < 0.05) decreased mean SpO<sub>2</sub>, MCAv, and RR, and increased TV index and HR. There was no effect of altitude (p > 0.05) on reaction time. BPAP increased mean SpO<sub>2</sub> at 8,000 feet [Control: 92 ± 1%; BPAP: 94 ± 2%; mean difference (MD) = 2 ± 2%; p = 0.002] and 12,500 feet [Control: 86 ± 4%; BPAP: 89 ± 4%; MD = 2 ± 3%; p = 0.013]. BPAP lowered MCAv at 8,000 feet [Control: 53 ± 10 cm/s; BPAP: 50 ± 9 cm/s; MD = -3 ± 2 cm/s; p = 0.001] and 12,500 feet [Control: 52 ± 10 cm/s; BPAP: 50 ± 8 cm/s; MD = -2 ± 3 cm/s; p = 0.041]. BPAP increased TV index at 8,000 feet (Control: 6.6 ± 1.3; BPAP:8.1 ± 1.8; MD = 1.9 ± 0.8; p < 0.001) but not 12,500 feet, without effect on RR or reaction time. This study provides preliminary results that BPAP may improve mean SpO<sub>2</sub> for recreational aviators up to 12,500 feet without supplemental oxygen.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 3","pages":"e70210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了商用双水平气道正压(BPAP)装置是否能在不补充氧气的情况下提高休闲飞行至 12500 英尺时的外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)。10 名有休闲飞行经验的成年人(年龄:47 ± 14;女性 = 5)在一架无压飞机上完成了标准化飞行剖面图,其中包括在 8000 英尺和 12500 英尺高度使用 BPAP 或对照组的随机交叉设计。对 SpO2、大脑中动脉速度 (MCAv)、心率 (HR)、呼吸频率 (RR) 和相对潮气量 (TV) 指数进行了连续测量。精神运动警觉性测试(3 分钟)评估了滑行和海拔阶段中途的反应时间。海拔对 MCAv 和 RR 有明显影响(p 2),并增加了 TV 指数和心率。海拔高度对反应时间没有影响(p > 0.05)。在 8,000 英尺 [对照组:92 ± 1%;BPAP:94 ± 2%;平均差 (MD) = 2 ± 2%;p = 0.002] 和 12,500 英尺 [对照组:86 ± 4%;BPAP:89 ± 4%;MD = 2 ± 3%;p = 0.013],BPAP 增加了平均 SpO2。在 8,000 英尺[对照组:53 ± 10 厘米/秒;BPAP:50 ± 9 厘米/秒;MD = -3 ± 2 厘米/秒;p = 0.001]和 12,500 英尺[对照组:52 ± 10 厘米/秒;BPAP:50 ± 8 厘米/秒;MD = -2 ± 3 厘米/秒;p = 0.041],BPAP 降低了 MCAv。在 8,000 英尺高度,BPAP 增加了电视指数(对照组:6.6 ± 1.3;BPAP:8.1 ± 1.8;MD = 1.9 ± 0.8;p 2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positive pressure ventilation improves oxygen saturation at altitude during recreational aviation: A pilot study.

Aim: We investigated whether a commercial bi-level positive airway pressure (BPAP) device, would improve peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during recreational aviation up to 12,500 feet without supplemental oxygen. Ten adults with recreational flight experience (age:47 ± 14; female = 5) completed a standardized flight profile in an unpressurised aircraft, involving randomized crossover design at 8,000 feet and 12,500 feet with BPAP or control. SpO2, middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and relative tidal volume (TV) index were measured continuously. Psychomotor vigilance test (3-min) assessed reaction time halfway through taxi and altitude stages. Altitude significantly (p < 0.05) decreased mean SpO2, MCAv, and RR, and increased TV index and HR. There was no effect of altitude (p > 0.05) on reaction time. BPAP increased mean SpO2 at 8,000 feet [Control: 92 ± 1%; BPAP: 94 ± 2%; mean difference (MD) = 2 ± 2%; p = 0.002] and 12,500 feet [Control: 86 ± 4%; BPAP: 89 ± 4%; MD = 2 ± 3%; p = 0.013]. BPAP lowered MCAv at 8,000 feet [Control: 53 ± 10 cm/s; BPAP: 50 ± 9 cm/s; MD = -3 ± 2 cm/s; p = 0.001] and 12,500 feet [Control: 52 ± 10 cm/s; BPAP: 50 ± 8 cm/s; MD = -2 ± 3 cm/s; p = 0.041]. BPAP increased TV index at 8,000 feet (Control: 6.6 ± 1.3; BPAP:8.1 ± 1.8; MD = 1.9 ± 0.8; p < 0.001) but not 12,500 feet, without effect on RR or reaction time. This study provides preliminary results that BPAP may improve mean SpO2 for recreational aviators up to 12,500 feet without supplemental oxygen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信