Alexander Maad El-Ali, Desi M Schiess, Dane Van Tassel, Catalina Le Cacheux, Shailee V Lala, Monique Riemann, Jeffrey Tutman, Andrew C Sher, Marla B K Sammer, Oscar M Navarro, HaiThuy N Nguyen, Cicero T Silva
{"title":"超声检查中肠扭转和旋转不良:多机构队列中非诊断性检查的频率和预测因素。","authors":"Alexander Maad El-Ali, Desi M Schiess, Dane Van Tassel, Catalina Le Cacheux, Shailee V Lala, Monique Riemann, Jeffrey Tutman, Andrew C Sher, Marla B K Sammer, Oscar M Navarro, HaiThuy N Nguyen, Cicero T Silva","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus, but may be non-diagnostic in some cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-diagnostic US for each midgut volvulus and malrotation in a multi-institutional sample.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study of children (age 0-18 years) who underwent US to evaluate for midgut volvulus and malrotation between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, and had an available reference standard of one of the following: upper GI series, CT/MRI, surgery, or, for volvulus, clinical follow-up at 30 days or greater. Blinded review of US images was performed by a single radiologist at each institution. When available, radiographs acquired ≤3 h from the US were reviewed for bowel gas pattern. After blinded review, original ultrasound reports were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic for midgut volvulus and malrotation. Stepwise logistic regression identified the most important predictors of non-diagnostic US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 637 patients were imaged for midgut volvulus and 311 for malrotation. Based on original report review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 13.5% (86/637) and 25.7% (80/311), respectively. Based on blinded review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 17.3% (110/637) and 37.6% (117/311), respectively. Of the patients with US considered non-diagnostic for volvulus by original reports, 2.3% (2/86) were subsequently found to have volvulus. Among patients with non-diagnostic US for volvulus by blinded review (n=110), none was found to have volvulus. Gaseous dilation with elongation of bowel on radiography was the single best predictor of a non-diagnostic US in blinded interpretation for volvulus and malrotation (OR=8.2 and 9.2; 95%CI 3.7-19.8 and 1.7-89.4, respectively) and in original radiology reports for volvulus (OR=4.5; 95%CI 2.2-9.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small fraction of a multi-institutional sample of US for midgut volvulus was non-diagnostic; however, assessment of malrotation without volvulus is associated with a higher frequency of non-diagnostic examinations. Dilated bowel gas pattern on radiography is the strongest predictor for a non-diagnostic US, although it does not necessarily preclude a diagnostic exam.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound for midgut volvulus and malrotation: frequency and predictors of a non-diagnostic examination in a multi-institutional cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Maad El-Ali, Desi M Schiess, Dane Van Tassel, Catalina Le Cacheux, Shailee V Lala, Monique Riemann, Jeffrey Tutman, Andrew C Sher, Marla B K Sammer, Oscar M Navarro, HaiThuy N Nguyen, Cicero T Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus, but may be non-diagnostic in some cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-diagnostic US for each midgut volvulus and malrotation in a multi-institutional sample.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study of children (age 0-18 years) who underwent US to evaluate for midgut volvulus and malrotation between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, and had an available reference standard of one of the following: upper GI series, CT/MRI, surgery, or, for volvulus, clinical follow-up at 30 days or greater. Blinded review of US images was performed by a single radiologist at each institution. When available, radiographs acquired ≤3 h from the US were reviewed for bowel gas pattern. After blinded review, original ultrasound reports were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic for midgut volvulus and malrotation. Stepwise logistic regression identified the most important predictors of non-diagnostic US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 637 patients were imaged for midgut volvulus and 311 for malrotation. Based on original report review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 13.5% (86/637) and 25.7% (80/311), respectively. Based on blinded review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 17.3% (110/637) and 37.6% (117/311), respectively. Of the patients with US considered non-diagnostic for volvulus by original reports, 2.3% (2/86) were subsequently found to have volvulus. Among patients with non-diagnostic US for volvulus by blinded review (n=110), none was found to have volvulus. Gaseous dilation with elongation of bowel on radiography was the single best predictor of a non-diagnostic US in blinded interpretation for volvulus and malrotation (OR=8.2 and 9.2; 95%CI 3.7-19.8 and 1.7-89.4, respectively) and in original radiology reports for volvulus (OR=4.5; 95%CI 2.2-9.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small fraction of a multi-institutional sample of US for midgut volvulus was non-diagnostic; however, assessment of malrotation without volvulus is associated with a higher frequency of non-diagnostic examinations. Dilated bowel gas pattern on radiography is the strongest predictor for a non-diagnostic US, although it does not necessarily preclude a diagnostic exam.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound for midgut volvulus and malrotation: frequency and predictors of a non-diagnostic examination in a multi-institutional cohort.
Background: Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus, but may be non-diagnostic in some cases.
Objective: To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-diagnostic US for each midgut volvulus and malrotation in a multi-institutional sample.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study of children (age 0-18 years) who underwent US to evaluate for midgut volvulus and malrotation between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, and had an available reference standard of one of the following: upper GI series, CT/MRI, surgery, or, for volvulus, clinical follow-up at 30 days or greater. Blinded review of US images was performed by a single radiologist at each institution. When available, radiographs acquired ≤3 h from the US were reviewed for bowel gas pattern. After blinded review, original ultrasound reports were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic for midgut volvulus and malrotation. Stepwise logistic regression identified the most important predictors of non-diagnostic US.
Results: In total, 637 patients were imaged for midgut volvulus and 311 for malrotation. Based on original report review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 13.5% (86/637) and 25.7% (80/311), respectively. Based on blinded review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 17.3% (110/637) and 37.6% (117/311), respectively. Of the patients with US considered non-diagnostic for volvulus by original reports, 2.3% (2/86) were subsequently found to have volvulus. Among patients with non-diagnostic US for volvulus by blinded review (n=110), none was found to have volvulus. Gaseous dilation with elongation of bowel on radiography was the single best predictor of a non-diagnostic US in blinded interpretation for volvulus and malrotation (OR=8.2 and 9.2; 95%CI 3.7-19.8 and 1.7-89.4, respectively) and in original radiology reports for volvulus (OR=4.5; 95%CI 2.2-9.5).
Conclusion: A small fraction of a multi-institutional sample of US for midgut volvulus was non-diagnostic; however, assessment of malrotation without volvulus is associated with a higher frequency of non-diagnostic examinations. Dilated bowel gas pattern on radiography is the strongest predictor for a non-diagnostic US, although it does not necessarily preclude a diagnostic exam.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.