超声检查中肠扭转和旋转不良:多机构队列中非诊断性检查的频率和预测因素。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Alexander Maad El-Ali, Desi M Schiess, Dane Van Tassel, Catalina Le Cacheux, Shailee V Lala, Monique Riemann, Jeffrey Tutman, Andrew C Sher, Marla B K Sammer, Oscar M Navarro, HaiThuy N Nguyen, Cicero T Silva
{"title":"超声检查中肠扭转和旋转不良:多机构队列中非诊断性检查的频率和预测因素。","authors":"Alexander Maad El-Ali, Desi M Schiess, Dane Van Tassel, Catalina Le Cacheux, Shailee V Lala, Monique Riemann, Jeffrey Tutman, Andrew C Sher, Marla B K Sammer, Oscar M Navarro, HaiThuy N Nguyen, Cicero T Silva","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus, but may be non-diagnostic in some cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-diagnostic US for each midgut volvulus and malrotation in a multi-institutional sample.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study of children (age 0-18 years) who underwent US to evaluate for midgut volvulus and malrotation between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, and had an available reference standard of one of the following: upper GI series, CT/MRI, surgery, or, for volvulus, clinical follow-up at 30 days or greater. Blinded review of US images was performed by a single radiologist at each institution. When available, radiographs acquired ≤3 h from the US were reviewed for bowel gas pattern. After blinded review, original ultrasound reports were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic for midgut volvulus and malrotation. Stepwise logistic regression identified the most important predictors of non-diagnostic US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 637 patients were imaged for midgut volvulus and 311 for malrotation. Based on original report review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 13.5% (86/637) and 25.7% (80/311), respectively. Based on blinded review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 17.3% (110/637) and 37.6% (117/311), respectively. Of the patients with US considered non-diagnostic for volvulus by original reports, 2.3% (2/86) were subsequently found to have volvulus. Among patients with non-diagnostic US for volvulus by blinded review (n=110), none was found to have volvulus. Gaseous dilation with elongation of bowel on radiography was the single best predictor of a non-diagnostic US in blinded interpretation for volvulus and malrotation (OR=8.2 and 9.2; 95%CI 3.7-19.8 and 1.7-89.4, respectively) and in original radiology reports for volvulus (OR=4.5; 95%CI 2.2-9.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small fraction of a multi-institutional sample of US for midgut volvulus was non-diagnostic; however, assessment of malrotation without volvulus is associated with a higher frequency of non-diagnostic examinations. Dilated bowel gas pattern on radiography is the strongest predictor for a non-diagnostic US, although it does not necessarily preclude a diagnostic exam.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound for midgut volvulus and malrotation: frequency and predictors of a non-diagnostic examination in a multi-institutional cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Maad El-Ali, Desi M Schiess, Dane Van Tassel, Catalina Le Cacheux, Shailee V Lala, Monique Riemann, Jeffrey Tutman, Andrew C Sher, Marla B K Sammer, Oscar M Navarro, HaiThuy N Nguyen, Cicero T Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus, but may be non-diagnostic in some cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-diagnostic US for each midgut volvulus and malrotation in a multi-institutional sample.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study of children (age 0-18 years) who underwent US to evaluate for midgut volvulus and malrotation between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, and had an available reference standard of one of the following: upper GI series, CT/MRI, surgery, or, for volvulus, clinical follow-up at 30 days or greater. Blinded review of US images was performed by a single radiologist at each institution. When available, radiographs acquired ≤3 h from the US were reviewed for bowel gas pattern. After blinded review, original ultrasound reports were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic for midgut volvulus and malrotation. Stepwise logistic regression identified the most important predictors of non-diagnostic US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 637 patients were imaged for midgut volvulus and 311 for malrotation. Based on original report review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 13.5% (86/637) and 25.7% (80/311), respectively. Based on blinded review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 17.3% (110/637) and 37.6% (117/311), respectively. Of the patients with US considered non-diagnostic for volvulus by original reports, 2.3% (2/86) were subsequently found to have volvulus. Among patients with non-diagnostic US for volvulus by blinded review (n=110), none was found to have volvulus. Gaseous dilation with elongation of bowel on radiography was the single best predictor of a non-diagnostic US in blinded interpretation for volvulus and malrotation (OR=8.2 and 9.2; 95%CI 3.7-19.8 and 1.7-89.4, respectively) and in original radiology reports for volvulus (OR=4.5; 95%CI 2.2-9.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small fraction of a multi-institutional sample of US for midgut volvulus was non-diagnostic; however, assessment of malrotation without volvulus is associated with a higher frequency of non-diagnostic examinations. Dilated bowel gas pattern on radiography is the strongest predictor for a non-diagnostic US, although it does not necessarily preclude a diagnostic exam.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06141-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声(US)越来越多地被用作诊断中肠扭转的一线成像方式,但在某些情况下可能无法诊断。目的:在一个多机构的样本中,确定每种中肠扭转和旋转不良的非诊断性US的频率和相关因素。材料和方法:我们对2018年1月1日至2021年6月30日期间接受美国超声检查以评估中肠扭转和旋转不良的儿童(0-18岁)进行了一项回顾性多机构研究,并有以下一项可用的参考标准:上消化道系列、CT/MRI、手术,或对扭转进行30天或更长时间的临床随访。每个机构的一名放射科医生对美国图像进行盲法评价。如有可能,检查从美国获得的≤3小时的x线片,以确定肠气型。盲法回顾后,原始超声报告被分为诊断性和非诊断性中肠扭转和旋转不良。逐步逻辑回归确定了非诊断性美国最重要的预测因素。结果:637例患者中肠扭转,311例患者旋转不良。根据原始报告的回顾,扭转和旋转不良检查的未诊断比例分别为13.5%(86/637)和25.7%(80/311)。基于盲法回顾,扭转和旋转不良检查的未诊断比例分别为17.3%(110/637)和37.6%(117/311)。在原始报告中认为US不能诊断为扭转的患者中,2.3%(2/86)随后被发现有扭转。通过盲法回顾(n=110),在非诊断性US为扭转的患者中,没有发现扭转。在盲法解释肠扭转和旋转不良时,x线片上的气体扩张伴肠伸长是非诊断性US的最佳预测指标(OR=8.2和9.2;95%CI分别为3.7-19.8和1.7-89.4),在原始的放射学报告中,肠扭转(OR=4.5;95%可信区间2.2 - -9.5)。结论:在多机构的US样本中,有一小部分是非诊断性的中肠扭转;然而,评估无扭转的旋转不良与非诊断性检查的频率较高有关。x线片上的肠胀气模式是非诊断性US的最强预测因子,尽管它并不一定排除诊断性检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound for midgut volvulus and malrotation: frequency and predictors of a non-diagnostic examination in a multi-institutional cohort.

Background: Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of midgut volvulus, but may be non-diagnostic in some cases.

Objective: To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-diagnostic US for each midgut volvulus and malrotation in a multi-institutional sample.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional study of children (age 0-18 years) who underwent US to evaluate for midgut volvulus and malrotation between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, and had an available reference standard of one of the following: upper GI series, CT/MRI, surgery, or, for volvulus, clinical follow-up at 30 days or greater. Blinded review of US images was performed by a single radiologist at each institution. When available, radiographs acquired ≤3 h from the US were reviewed for bowel gas pattern. After blinded review, original ultrasound reports were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic for midgut volvulus and malrotation. Stepwise logistic regression identified the most important predictors of non-diagnostic US.

Results: In total, 637 patients were imaged for midgut volvulus and 311 for malrotation. Based on original report review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 13.5% (86/637) and 25.7% (80/311), respectively. Based on blinded review, non-diagnostic proportions of examinations for volvulus and malrotation were 17.3% (110/637) and 37.6% (117/311), respectively. Of the patients with US considered non-diagnostic for volvulus by original reports, 2.3% (2/86) were subsequently found to have volvulus. Among patients with non-diagnostic US for volvulus by blinded review (n=110), none was found to have volvulus. Gaseous dilation with elongation of bowel on radiography was the single best predictor of a non-diagnostic US in blinded interpretation for volvulus and malrotation (OR=8.2 and 9.2; 95%CI 3.7-19.8 and 1.7-89.4, respectively) and in original radiology reports for volvulus (OR=4.5; 95%CI 2.2-9.5).

Conclusion: A small fraction of a multi-institutional sample of US for midgut volvulus was non-diagnostic; however, assessment of malrotation without volvulus is associated with a higher frequency of non-diagnostic examinations. Dilated bowel gas pattern on radiography is the strongest predictor for a non-diagnostic US, although it does not necessarily preclude a diagnostic exam.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信