低温球囊消融后使用射频能量重复肺静脉隔离手术的零氟“无围裙”入路的可行性和安全性。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Vedran Velagic, Vedran Pasara, Ivan Prepolec, Andrija Nekic, Zvonimir Katic, Davor Milicic
{"title":"低温球囊消融后使用射频能量重复肺静脉隔离手术的零氟“无围裙”入路的可行性和安全性。","authors":"Vedran Velagic, Vedran Pasara, Ivan Prepolec, Andrija Nekic, Zvonimir Katic, Davor Milicic","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87940-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro approach for the repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) procedures after initial cryoballoon (CB) ablation. We have performed a retrospective study on patients that have undergone repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures in our institution since zero-fluoro program was initiated in 2020. All patients received CB ablation for the initial procedure. Repeat procedures were performed under conscious sedation and with intracardiac echo (ICE) and 3D mapping system - without the use of fluoroscopy and lead aprons. We have analysed in total 50 patients (76% male, 57.9 ± 10.2 years old), 50% of which suffered from paroxysmal AF. All procedures were successfully performed without the use of fluoroscopy. The mean procedure time was 93.9 ± 27.1 min and the mean RF time was 825 ± 468 s. The mean of 0.98 ± 0.91 veins was reconnected per patient and 36% of patients did not have PV reconnections. In all patients successful PV isolation was performed, confirmed by entry and exit block. No major periprocedural complications were observed. After the mean follow up of 12.5 ± 3.4 months: 68% of mixed AF population patients were free from AF after one year. In our cohort of patients, zero-fluoro, apron-less approach for repeat PVI procedures after index cryoballoon ablation proved to be feasible and safe. Index CB ablation resulted with low rates of PV reconnections and mid-term results after repeat procedures are favourable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"4280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro, \\\"apron-less\\\" approach to repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures using radiofrequency energy after initial cryoballoon ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Vedran Velagic, Vedran Pasara, Ivan Prepolec, Andrija Nekic, Zvonimir Katic, Davor Milicic\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87940-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro approach for the repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) procedures after initial cryoballoon (CB) ablation. We have performed a retrospective study on patients that have undergone repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures in our institution since zero-fluoro program was initiated in 2020. All patients received CB ablation for the initial procedure. Repeat procedures were performed under conscious sedation and with intracardiac echo (ICE) and 3D mapping system - without the use of fluoroscopy and lead aprons. We have analysed in total 50 patients (76% male, 57.9 ± 10.2 years old), 50% of which suffered from paroxysmal AF. All procedures were successfully performed without the use of fluoroscopy. The mean procedure time was 93.9 ± 27.1 min and the mean RF time was 825 ± 468 s. The mean of 0.98 ± 0.91 veins was reconnected per patient and 36% of patients did not have PV reconnections. In all patients successful PV isolation was performed, confirmed by entry and exit block. No major periprocedural complications were observed. After the mean follow up of 12.5 ± 3.4 months: 68% of mixed AF population patients were free from AF after one year. In our cohort of patients, zero-fluoro, apron-less approach for repeat PVI procedures after index cryoballoon ablation proved to be feasible and safe. Index CB ablation resulted with low rates of PV reconnections and mid-term results after repeat procedures are favourable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"4280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794559/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87940-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87940-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是探讨零氟入路在低温球囊消融(CB)后重复房颤(AF)手术中的可行性和安全性。我们对自2020年零氟项目启动以来在我院接受重复肺静脉隔离(PVI)手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。所有患者在初始手术中均接受CB消融。在清醒镇静、心内超声(ICE)和3D制图系统下进行重复手术,不使用透视和铅围裙。我们总共分析了50例患者(76%男性,57.9±10.2岁),其中50%患有阵发性房颤。所有手术均成功完成,未使用透视。平均手术时间为93.9±27.1 min,平均射频时间为825±468 s。平均每例患者有0.98±0.91条静脉重新连接,36%的患者没有PV重新连接。所有患者均成功进行PV分离,并通过进出阻断加以证实。术中未见重大并发症。平均随访12.5±3.4个月后,68%的混合性房颤患者1年后无房颤。在我们的患者队列中,无氟、无围裙入路在指数低温球囊消融后进行重复PVI手术被证明是可行和安全的。指数CB消融导致PV重连率低,重复手术后中期结果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro, "apron-less" approach to repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures using radiofrequency energy after initial cryoballoon ablation.

Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro, "apron-less" approach to repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures using radiofrequency energy after initial cryoballoon ablation.

Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro, "apron-less" approach to repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures using radiofrequency energy after initial cryoballoon ablation.

Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro, "apron-less" approach to repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures using radiofrequency energy after initial cryoballoon ablation.

We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro approach for the repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) procedures after initial cryoballoon (CB) ablation. We have performed a retrospective study on patients that have undergone repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures in our institution since zero-fluoro program was initiated in 2020. All patients received CB ablation for the initial procedure. Repeat procedures were performed under conscious sedation and with intracardiac echo (ICE) and 3D mapping system - without the use of fluoroscopy and lead aprons. We have analysed in total 50 patients (76% male, 57.9 ± 10.2 years old), 50% of which suffered from paroxysmal AF. All procedures were successfully performed without the use of fluoroscopy. The mean procedure time was 93.9 ± 27.1 min and the mean RF time was 825 ± 468 s. The mean of 0.98 ± 0.91 veins was reconnected per patient and 36% of patients did not have PV reconnections. In all patients successful PV isolation was performed, confirmed by entry and exit block. No major periprocedural complications were observed. After the mean follow up of 12.5 ± 3.4 months: 68% of mixed AF population patients were free from AF after one year. In our cohort of patients, zero-fluoro, apron-less approach for repeat PVI procedures after index cryoballoon ablation proved to be feasible and safe. Index CB ablation resulted with low rates of PV reconnections and mid-term results after repeat procedures are favourable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信