骨盆环损伤后的医源性神经损伤:网络荟萃分析。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Yu-Cheng Su, Yung-Heng Hsu, Ying-Chao Chou, I-Jung Chen, Chih-Yang Lai, Yi-Hsun Yu
{"title":"骨盆环损伤后的医源性神经损伤:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yu-Cheng Su, Yung-Heng Hsu, Ying-Chao Chou, I-Jung Chen, Chih-Yang Lai, Yi-Hsun Yu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic ring injuries are common in multi-trauma patients and can be life-threatening, necessitating prompt surgical intervention to improve outcomes. However, surgery can lead to complications such as iatrogenic nerve injury. This network meta-analysis aimed to improve outcomes in multi-trauma patients with pelvic ring injuries by evaluating the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, identifying vulnerable nerves, and comparing different fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to 5 December 2023 revealed 29 comparative studies on the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury in 1561 adult patients with pelvic ring injuries. Data were extracted on study and patient characteristics, iatrogenic nerve injury incidences, and specific nerve injuries. A random-effects model assessed treatment effects, with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The main outcomes included odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for iatrogenic nerve injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with closed reduction internal fixation, robotic-assisted techniques had the highest, and open reduction internal fixation had the lowest ORs for iatrogenic nerve injuries. The robotic-assisted approach ranked best with an OR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.02-2.16), while closed reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.21-2.48) and open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach performed the worst. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was injured in all open reduction internal fixation with anterior approach procedures and in 66.7% of open reduction internal fixation with posterior approach procedures. Meta-regression showed a significantly lower OR for iatrogenic nerve injuries in patients aged >41.4 years in the open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach group (OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.001-0.63; P  = 0.026) compared with younger patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic-assisted technique may result in the fewest iatrogenic nerve injuries during the treatment of pelvic ring injuries. The posterior approach may also reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2697-2707"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iatrogenic nerve injury following pelvic ring injury: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Cheng Su, Yung-Heng Hsu, Ying-Chao Chou, I-Jung Chen, Chih-Yang Lai, Yi-Hsun Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic ring injuries are common in multi-trauma patients and can be life-threatening, necessitating prompt surgical intervention to improve outcomes. However, surgery can lead to complications such as iatrogenic nerve injury. This network meta-analysis aimed to improve outcomes in multi-trauma patients with pelvic ring injuries by evaluating the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, identifying vulnerable nerves, and comparing different fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to 5 December 2023 revealed 29 comparative studies on the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury in 1561 adult patients with pelvic ring injuries. Data were extracted on study and patient characteristics, iatrogenic nerve injury incidences, and specific nerve injuries. A random-effects model assessed treatment effects, with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The main outcomes included odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for iatrogenic nerve injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with closed reduction internal fixation, robotic-assisted techniques had the highest, and open reduction internal fixation had the lowest ORs for iatrogenic nerve injuries. The robotic-assisted approach ranked best with an OR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.02-2.16), while closed reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.21-2.48) and open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach performed the worst. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was injured in all open reduction internal fixation with anterior approach procedures and in 66.7% of open reduction internal fixation with posterior approach procedures. Meta-regression showed a significantly lower OR for iatrogenic nerve injuries in patients aged >41.4 years in the open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach group (OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.001-0.63; P  = 0.026) compared with younger patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic-assisted technique may result in the fewest iatrogenic nerve injuries during the treatment of pelvic ring injuries. The posterior approach may also reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2697-2707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨盆环损伤在多重创伤患者中很常见,可能危及生命,需要及时手术干预以改善预后。然而,手术可能导致并发症,如医源性神经损伤。本网络荟萃分析旨在通过评估医源性神经损伤的发生率,识别易损神经,并比较不同的固定方法来改善骨盆环损伤多发创伤患者的预后。材料和方法:系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Scopus自成立至2023年12月5日,发现29项比较研究1561例成人骨盆环损伤的医源性神经损伤发生率。提取有关研究和患者特征、医源性神经损伤发生率和特异性神经损伤的数据。随机效应模型评估治疗效果,采用亚组分析和meta回归。主要结局包括医源性神经损伤的优势比(ORs)和置信区间(CIs)。结果:与闭合复位内固定相比,机器人辅助技术治疗医源性神经损伤的or最高,而开放复位内固定的or最低。机器人辅助入路排名最佳,OR为0.22 (95%CI: 0.02-2.16),而前路闭合复位内固定(OR: 0.71;95%CI: 0.21-2.48)和前路切开复位内固定效果最差。所有前路切开复位内固定和66.7%后路切开复位内固定均损伤股骨外侧皮神经。meta回归分析显示,前路切开复位内固定组bb0 ~ 41.4岁患者医源性神经损伤的OR显著降低(OR: 0.02;95%置信区间:0.001—-0.63;P = 0.026)。结论:在骨盆环损伤治疗中,机器人辅助技术可减少医源性神经损伤。后路手术也可降低医源性神经损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iatrogenic nerve injury following pelvic ring injury: a network meta-analysis.

Background: Pelvic ring injuries are common in multi-trauma patients and can be life-threatening, necessitating prompt surgical intervention to improve outcomes. However, surgery can lead to complications such as iatrogenic nerve injury. This network meta-analysis aimed to improve outcomes in multi-trauma patients with pelvic ring injuries by evaluating the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, identifying vulnerable nerves, and comparing different fixation methods.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to 5 December 2023 revealed 29 comparative studies on the incidence of iatrogenic nerve injury in 1561 adult patients with pelvic ring injuries. Data were extracted on study and patient characteristics, iatrogenic nerve injury incidences, and specific nerve injuries. A random-effects model assessed treatment effects, with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The main outcomes included odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for iatrogenic nerve injuries.

Results: Compared with closed reduction internal fixation, robotic-assisted techniques had the highest, and open reduction internal fixation had the lowest ORs for iatrogenic nerve injuries. The robotic-assisted approach ranked best with an OR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.02-2.16), while closed reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.21-2.48) and open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach performed the worst. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was injured in all open reduction internal fixation with anterior approach procedures and in 66.7% of open reduction internal fixation with posterior approach procedures. Meta-regression showed a significantly lower OR for iatrogenic nerve injuries in patients aged >41.4 years in the open reduction internal fixation with the anterior approach group (OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.001-0.63; P  = 0.026) compared with younger patients.

Conclusion: The robotic-assisted technique may result in the fewest iatrogenic nerve injuries during the treatment of pelvic ring injuries. The posterior approach may also reduce the risk of iatrogenic nerve injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信