Hardik Rughwani, Rakesh Kalapala, Anudeep Katrevula, Nitin Jagtap, Madhav Desai, Sara Teles de Campos, Mohan Ramchandani, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Rupjyoti Talukdar, Santosh Darisetty, Sana Fatima Memon, Guduru Venkat Rao, Marco Bruno, Prateek Sharma, D Nageshwar Reddy
{"title":"一家三级医疗机构胃肠道内窥镜检查程序的碳足迹和环境影响:一项前瞻性多维评估。","authors":"Hardik Rughwani, Rakesh Kalapala, Anudeep Katrevula, Nitin Jagtap, Madhav Desai, Sara Teles de Campos, Mohan Ramchandani, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Rupjyoti Talukdar, Santosh Darisetty, Sana Fatima Memon, Guduru Venkat Rao, Marco Bruno, Prateek Sharma, D Nageshwar Reddy","doi":"10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the imperative to combat climate change, reducing the healthcare sector's implications on the environment is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to offer a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) procedures, specifically focusing on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste generation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective study was conducted at the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG Hospitals), Hyderabad, India, from 29 May to 10 June 2023, including all consecutive GIE procedures. Carbon emissions for various variables involved were calculated with specific emission factors using 'The GHG Protocol'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on data from 3244 consecutive patients undergoing 3873 procedures, the study revealed a total carbon footprint of 148 947.32 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e or 38.45 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per procedure. Excluding patient travel, the emissions were 6.50 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per procedure. The total waste generated was 1952.50 kg, averaging 0.504 kg per procedure, far less than 2-3 kg per procedure in the West. The waste disposal breakdown was 9.5% direct landfilling, 64.8% incineration, then landfilling and 25.7% recycling, which saved 380 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e. India effectively recycles 25.7% of hospital-related waste, which undergoes landfilling in the West. The primary contributors to GHG emissions were patient travel (83.09%), electricity consumption (10.42%), medical gas transport and usage (3.63%) and water consumption (1.86%). Diagnostic procedures generate less waste and lower carbon footprint than therapeutic procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the significant environmental footprint of GIE procedures, emphasising the importance of optimising practices to reduce patient travel and repeat procedures, alongside improving electricity and water management for sustainable healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12825,"journal":{"name":"Gut","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon footprinting and environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures at a tertiary care institution: a prospective multi-dimensional assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Hardik Rughwani, Rakesh Kalapala, Anudeep Katrevula, Nitin Jagtap, Madhav Desai, Sara Teles de Campos, Mohan Ramchandani, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Rupjyoti Talukdar, Santosh Darisetty, Sana Fatima Memon, Guduru Venkat Rao, Marco Bruno, Prateek Sharma, D Nageshwar Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the imperative to combat climate change, reducing the healthcare sector's implications on the environment is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to offer a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) procedures, specifically focusing on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste generation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective study was conducted at the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG Hospitals), Hyderabad, India, from 29 May to 10 June 2023, including all consecutive GIE procedures. Carbon emissions for various variables involved were calculated with specific emission factors using 'The GHG Protocol'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on data from 3244 consecutive patients undergoing 3873 procedures, the study revealed a total carbon footprint of 148 947.32 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e or 38.45 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per procedure. Excluding patient travel, the emissions were 6.50 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per procedure. The total waste generated was 1952.50 kg, averaging 0.504 kg per procedure, far less than 2-3 kg per procedure in the West. The waste disposal breakdown was 9.5% direct landfilling, 64.8% incineration, then landfilling and 25.7% recycling, which saved 380 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e. India effectively recycles 25.7% of hospital-related waste, which undergoes landfilling in the West. The primary contributors to GHG emissions were patient travel (83.09%), electricity consumption (10.42%), medical gas transport and usage (3.63%) and water consumption (1.86%). Diagnostic procedures generate less waste and lower carbon footprint than therapeutic procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the significant environmental footprint of GIE procedures, emphasising the importance of optimising practices to reduce patient travel and repeat procedures, alongside improving electricity and water management for sustainable healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332471\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:鉴于应对气候变化的必要性,减少医疗保健部门对环境的影响至关重要。目的:本研究旨在全面评估胃肠道内窥镜(GIE)手术对环境的影响,特别是温室气体(GHG)排放和废物产生。设计:一项前瞻性研究于2023年5月29日至6月10日在印度海得拉巴的亚洲胃肠病学研究所(AIG医院)进行,包括所有连续的GIE手术。所涉及的各种变量的碳排放量使用“温室气体议定书”的特定排放因子进行计算。结果:基于3244名连续接受3873次手术的患者的数据,该研究揭示了总碳足迹为148 947.32 kg CO2e或每次手术38.45 kg CO2e。除去病人的旅行,每次手术的排放量为6.50 kg二氧化碳当量。总产生量为1952.50 kg,平均每道工序产生量为0.504 kg,远低于西方国家的2-3 kg。垃圾处理分解为直接填埋9.5%,焚烧64.8%,再填埋,回收25.7%,节约二氧化碳当量380公斤。印度有效地回收了25.7%的与医院有关的废物,这些废物在西方进行了填埋。温室气体排放的主要来源是患者旅行(83.09%)、电力消耗(10.42%)、医用气体运输和使用(3.63%)和水消耗(1.86%)。诊断程序比治疗程序产生更少的废物和更低的碳足迹。结论:本研究强调了GIE程序的显著环境足迹,强调了优化实践以减少患者旅行和重复程序的重要性,同时改善电力和水管理以实现可持续医疗保健。
Carbon footprinting and environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures at a tertiary care institution: a prospective multi-dimensional assessment.
Background: Given the imperative to combat climate change, reducing the healthcare sector's implications on the environment is crucial.
Objective: This study aims to offer a comprehensive assessment of the environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) procedures, specifically focusing on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste generation.
Design: A prospective study was conducted at the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG Hospitals), Hyderabad, India, from 29 May to 10 June 2023, including all consecutive GIE procedures. Carbon emissions for various variables involved were calculated with specific emission factors using 'The GHG Protocol'.
Results: Based on data from 3244 consecutive patients undergoing 3873 procedures, the study revealed a total carbon footprint of 148 947.32 kg CO2e or 38.45 kg CO2e per procedure. Excluding patient travel, the emissions were 6.50 kg CO2e per procedure. The total waste generated was 1952.50 kg, averaging 0.504 kg per procedure, far less than 2-3 kg per procedure in the West. The waste disposal breakdown was 9.5% direct landfilling, 64.8% incineration, then landfilling and 25.7% recycling, which saved 380 kg CO2e. India effectively recycles 25.7% of hospital-related waste, which undergoes landfilling in the West. The primary contributors to GHG emissions were patient travel (83.09%), electricity consumption (10.42%), medical gas transport and usage (3.63%) and water consumption (1.86%). Diagnostic procedures generate less waste and lower carbon footprint than therapeutic procedures.
Conclusion: This study highlights the significant environmental footprint of GIE procedures, emphasising the importance of optimising practices to reduce patient travel and repeat procedures, alongside improving electricity and water management for sustainable healthcare.
期刊介绍:
Gut is a renowned international journal specializing in gastroenterology and hepatology, known for its high-quality clinical research covering the alimentary tract, liver, biliary tree, and pancreas. It offers authoritative and current coverage across all aspects of gastroenterology and hepatology, featuring articles on emerging disease mechanisms and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches authored by leading experts.
As the flagship journal of BMJ's gastroenterology portfolio, Gut is accompanied by two companion journals: Frontline Gastroenterology, focusing on education and practice-oriented papers, and BMJ Open Gastroenterology for open access original research.