Suehyun Park, Taewan Ku, Deokbi Hwang, Woo-Sung Yun, Seung Huh, Hyung-Kee Kim
{"title":"Impact of open femoral endarterectomy on treating multilevel iliac and common femoral artery occlusive disease.","authors":"Suehyun Park, Taewan Ku, Deokbi Hwang, Woo-Sung Yun, Seung Huh, Hyung-Kee Kim","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1445846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of femoral endarterectomy (FE) on treating multilevel iliac and common femoral artery occlusive disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2013 to December 2022, 106 limbs in 103 patients with multilevel arterial occlusive disease underwent open FE and iliac angioplasty (FEIA) with or without infrainguinal revascularization. The primary outcome assessment was the changes in the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification during the operation; the secondary outcomes included the primary patency (PP) and secondary patency (SP) of FEIA. The risk factors for PP loss were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 103 patients, 91 were male. A total of 56 limbs were treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and 61 limbs underwent infrainguinal revascularization. Preoperatively, aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) was classified as TASC II C in 65 (61%) limbs and D in 41 limbs. During the operation, 19 limbs received additional thrombectomy for subacute or chronic thrombus components. Overall, FE and additional thrombectomy reduced the TASC II classification of AIOD from complex lesions (TASC II C/D) to simple lesions (B or lesser) in 101 (95%) of 106 limbs. Three early mortalities (2.8%, two from acute myocardial infarctions and one from pneumonia) were recorded. The PP and SP of FEIA were 89% and 96% at 1 year, 80% and 94% at 3 years, and 77% and 94% at 5 years, respectively. The severity of iliac and common femoral artery disease was not associated with PP loss of FEIA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the challenging nature of initially classified TASC II C/D lesions, our findings highlight the effectiveness of FE in reducing TASC II classification and the durable patency achieved with FEIA. Hybrid FEIA could be a viable primary treatment option, particularly for lesions featuring severe iliac and common femoral artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1445846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1445846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估股动脉内膜剥脱术(FE)对治疗多层次髂动脉和股总动脉闭塞性疾病的影响:2013年1月至2022年12月,103名多层动脉闭塞症患者的106条肢体接受了开放性股动脉内膜剥脱术和髂血管成形术(FEIA),并接受或不接受髂腹股沟下血管再通术。主要结果评估是手术期间跨大西洋学会间共识(TASC)II分类的变化;次要结果包括FEIA的一次通畅(PP)和二次通畅(SP)。结果:103例患者中,91例为男性。共有56条肢体接受了慢性肢体缺血治疗,61条肢体接受了腹股沟下血管重建术。术前,65 个肢体(61%)的主动脉髂闭塞症(AIOD)被归类为 TASC II C 级,41 个肢体被归类为 D 级。手术期间,有19条肢体因亚急性或慢性血栓成分而接受了额外的血栓切除术。总体而言,FE和额外的血栓切除术将106个肢体中101个(95%)肢体的TASC II AIOD分类从复杂病变(TASC II C/D)降至简单病变(B或以下)。有 3 例早期死亡病例(2.8%,其中 2 例死于急性心肌梗死,1 例死于肺炎)。FEIA 的 PP 和 SP 在 1 年时分别为 89% 和 96%,3 年时分别为 80% 和 94%,5 年时分别为 77% 和 94%。髂动脉和股总动脉疾病的严重程度与FEIA的PP损失无关:尽管初步分类为TASC II C/D的病变具有挑战性,但我们的研究结果凸显了FE在减少TASC II分类方面的有效性,以及FEIA实现的持久通畅。混合 FEIA 可以作为一种可行的主要治疗方案,特别是对于严重的髂动脉和股总动脉疾病病变。
Impact of open femoral endarterectomy on treating multilevel iliac and common femoral artery occlusive disease.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of femoral endarterectomy (FE) on treating multilevel iliac and common femoral artery occlusive disease.
Materials and methods: From January 2013 to December 2022, 106 limbs in 103 patients with multilevel arterial occlusive disease underwent open FE and iliac angioplasty (FEIA) with or without infrainguinal revascularization. The primary outcome assessment was the changes in the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification during the operation; the secondary outcomes included the primary patency (PP) and secondary patency (SP) of FEIA. The risk factors for PP loss were evaluated.
Results: Of the 103 patients, 91 were male. A total of 56 limbs were treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and 61 limbs underwent infrainguinal revascularization. Preoperatively, aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) was classified as TASC II C in 65 (61%) limbs and D in 41 limbs. During the operation, 19 limbs received additional thrombectomy for subacute or chronic thrombus components. Overall, FE and additional thrombectomy reduced the TASC II classification of AIOD from complex lesions (TASC II C/D) to simple lesions (B or lesser) in 101 (95%) of 106 limbs. Three early mortalities (2.8%, two from acute myocardial infarctions and one from pneumonia) were recorded. The PP and SP of FEIA were 89% and 96% at 1 year, 80% and 94% at 3 years, and 77% and 94% at 5 years, respectively. The severity of iliac and common femoral artery disease was not associated with PP loss of FEIA.
Conclusions: Despite the challenging nature of initially classified TASC II C/D lesions, our findings highlight the effectiveness of FE in reducing TASC II classification and the durable patency achieved with FEIA. Hybrid FEIA could be a viable primary treatment option, particularly for lesions featuring severe iliac and common femoral artery disease.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.