晶格动力学计算的有效方法:蒙特卡罗重要采样积分法。

IF 2.6 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER
Michimasa Morita, Junichiro Shiomi
{"title":"晶格动力学计算的有效方法:蒙特卡罗重要采样积分法。","authors":"Michimasa Morita, Junichiro Shiomi","doi":"10.1088/1361-648X/adb231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we aimed to accelerate the thermal conductivity calculations of crystalline nanostructures using anharmonic lattice dynamics. For this we implemented Monte Carlo (MC) integration for relaxation time calculations and achieved a dramatic acceleration of approximately two orders of magnitude. The relaxation times can be calculated by computing the scattering rates for all phonon combinations; however, in this MC integration, we instead calculated the scattering rates of a randomly sampled subset of combinations. Then, we estimated the overall scattering rate. Simple MC integration samples the scattering channels that do not contribute to the total scattering rate, leading to inefficiencies. To address this issue, we implemented an importance sampling method (ISM) for improving sampling efficiency. In this study, we compared the computational speeds of both methods and investigated the differences in accuracy by comparing the results with the exact values obtained from traditional relaxation time calculations. The comparison showed similarity between both methods in terms of speed; however, ISM was faster when the error margin was ∼5%. Furthermore, while simple MC integration risks significantly worse accuracy as the system size increases, the ISM remains relatively robust and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficient method of lattice dynamics calculation: Monte Carlo integration with importance sampling.\",\"authors\":\"Michimasa Morita, Junichiro Shiomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-648X/adb231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we aimed to accelerate the thermal conductivity calculations of crystalline nanostructures using anharmonic lattice dynamics. For this we implemented Monte Carlo (MC) integration for relaxation time calculations and achieved a dramatic acceleration of approximately two orders of magnitude. The relaxation times can be calculated by computing the scattering rates for all phonon combinations; however, in this MC integration, we instead calculated the scattering rates of a randomly sampled subset of combinations. Then, we estimated the overall scattering rate. Simple MC integration samples the scattering channels that do not contribute to the total scattering rate, leading to inefficiencies. To address this issue, we implemented an importance sampling method (ISM) for improving sampling efficiency. In this study, we compared the computational speeds of both methods and investigated the differences in accuracy by comparing the results with the exact values obtained from traditional relaxation time calculations. The comparison showed similarity between both methods in terms of speed; however, ISM was faster when the error margin was ∼5%. Furthermore, while simple MC integration risks significantly worse accuracy as the system size increases, the ISM remains relatively robust and reliable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/adb231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/adb231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们旨在利用非调和晶格动力学加速晶体纳米结构的热导率计算。为此,我们实现了用于松弛时间计算的蒙特卡罗积分,并实现了大约两个数量级的显著加速。弛豫时间可以通过计算所有声子组合的散射率来计算;然而,在这个蒙特卡罗积分中,我们计算了随机抽样组合子集的散射率。然后,我们估计了总体散射率。简单蒙特卡罗积分对不影响总散射率的散射通道进行采样,导致效率低下。为了解决这一问题,我们实施了一种重要抽样方法(ISM)来提高抽样效率。在本研究中,我们比较了两种方法的计算速度,并通过将结果与传统松弛时间计算得到的精确值进行比较,研究了精度的差异。比较表明,两种方法在速度方面相似;但是,当误差范围为~ 5%时,ISM的速度更快。此外,虽然简单的蒙特卡罗集成随着系统规模的增加,精度会显著降低,但ISM仍然相对稳健和可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficient method of lattice dynamics calculation: Monte Carlo integration with importance sampling.

In this study, we aimed to accelerate the thermal conductivity calculations of crystalline nanostructures using anharmonic lattice dynamics. For this we implemented Monte Carlo (MC) integration for relaxation time calculations and achieved a dramatic acceleration of approximately two orders of magnitude. The relaxation times can be calculated by computing the scattering rates for all phonon combinations; however, in this MC integration, we instead calculated the scattering rates of a randomly sampled subset of combinations. Then, we estimated the overall scattering rate. Simple MC integration samples the scattering channels that do not contribute to the total scattering rate, leading to inefficiencies. To address this issue, we implemented an importance sampling method (ISM) for improving sampling efficiency. In this study, we compared the computational speeds of both methods and investigated the differences in accuracy by comparing the results with the exact values obtained from traditional relaxation time calculations. The comparison showed similarity between both methods in terms of speed; however, ISM was faster when the error margin was ∼5%. Furthermore, while simple MC integration risks significantly worse accuracy as the system size increases, the ISM remains relatively robust and reliable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 物理-物理:凝聚态物理
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
1288
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter covers the whole of condensed matter physics including soft condensed matter and nanostructures. Papers may report experimental, theoretical and simulation studies. Note that papers must contain fundamental condensed matter science: papers reporting methods of materials preparation or properties of materials without novel condensed matter content will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书