IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiao-Qiong Lv, Wen-Rong Shen, Zhen Guo, Xiao-Dong Xie
{"title":"Diagnostic value and efficacy of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in glioblastomas.","authors":"Xiao-Qiong Lv, Wen-Rong Shen, Zhen Guo, Xiao-Dong Xie","doi":"10.1177/02841851241310392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing radiation necrosis (RN) from recurrent tumor (RT) in patients with gliomas treated with radiation therapy presents an important clinical dilemma.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in distinguishing RN from RT in patients with histologically confirmed glioma treated previously with radiotherapy and chemotherapy or without chemotherapy using a combination of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with glioma who developed a new enhancing mass after standard treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Conventional MRI, DTI, DSC, and MRS were performed. The region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn in the enhancing lesions, peri-lesional white matter edema, and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), NAA/Cr, Cho/NAA, and Cho/Cr were calculated. Two-tailed <i>t</i>-test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 34 patients with RT and 25 with RN met our inclusion criteria. FA, rCBF, rCBV, Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr were statistically significant between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of FA, rCBF, rCBV, Cho/NAA, and Cho/Cr in the diagnosis of RT were 70.6%, 97.1%, 91.2%, 91.2%, and 82.4% and 64%, 100%, 100%, 96%, and 72% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DTI, DSC, and MRS are of great value in the differential diagnosis of RN and RT of glioma. The diagnostic performance of DSC is better than DTI and MRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241310392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241310392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受放射治疗的胶质瘤患者中,如何区分放射坏死(RN)和复发性肿瘤(RT)是一个重要的临床难题。目的:评估多参数磁共振成像(MRI)技术的诊断性能,以区分曾接受放疗和化疗或未接受化疗的组织学确诊胶质瘤患者中的放射性坏死(RN)和复发性肿瘤(RT),方法包括动态感度加权对比增强(DSC)灌注磁共振成像、弥散张量成像(DTI)和磁共振波谱成像(MRS):对经过标准治疗后出现新的增强肿块的胶质瘤患者进行回顾性评估。对患者进行了常规 MRI、DTI、DSC 和 MRS 检查。在增强病灶、周围白质水肿和对侧正常白质中手动绘制感兴趣区(ROI)。计算表观弥散系数(ADC)、各向异性分数(FA)、相对脑血量(rCBV)、相对脑血流(rCBF)、N-乙酰天冬氨酸(NAA)、胆碱(Cho)、肌酸(Cr)、NAA/Cr、Cho/NAA 和 Cho/Cr。进行双尾 t 检验和接收者操作特征曲线分析:共有 34 名 RT 患者和 25 名 RN 患者符合纳入标准。两组患者的 FA、rCBF、rCBV、Cho/NAA、Cho/Cr 均有统计学意义(PDTI、DSC和MRS在胶质瘤RN和RT的鉴别诊断中具有重要价值。DSC 的诊断效果优于 DTI 和 MRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value and efficacy of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in glioblastomas.

Background: Distinguishing radiation necrosis (RN) from recurrent tumor (RT) in patients with gliomas treated with radiation therapy presents an important clinical dilemma.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in distinguishing RN from RT in patients with histologically confirmed glioma treated previously with radiotherapy and chemotherapy or without chemotherapy using a combination of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS).

Material and methods: Patients with glioma who developed a new enhancing mass after standard treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Conventional MRI, DTI, DSC, and MRS were performed. The region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn in the enhancing lesions, peri-lesional white matter edema, and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), NAA/Cr, Cho/NAA, and Cho/Cr were calculated. Two-tailed t-test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed.

Results: In total, 34 patients with RT and 25 with RN met our inclusion criteria. FA, rCBF, rCBV, Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of FA, rCBF, rCBV, Cho/NAA, and Cho/Cr in the diagnosis of RT were 70.6%, 97.1%, 91.2%, 91.2%, and 82.4% and 64%, 100%, 100%, 96%, and 72% respectively.

Conclusion: DTI, DSC, and MRS are of great value in the differential diagnosis of RN and RT of glioma. The diagnostic performance of DSC is better than DTI and MRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信