Lauren E. Gregory, Rose M. H. Driscoll, Benjamin J. Parker, Jennifer A. Brisson
{"title":"体色、共生体和基因组区域对豌豆蚜虫翅膀可塑性变异的影响。","authors":"Lauren E. Gregory, Rose M. H. Driscoll, Benjamin J. Parker, Jennifer A. Brisson","doi":"10.1111/mec.17660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Adaptive phenotypic plasticity describes the phenomenon in which a single genotype can produce a variety of phenotypes that match their environments. Like any trait, plasticity is a phenotype that can exhibit variation, but despite the ecological importance of plasticity variation, little is known about its genetic basis. Here we use the pea aphid to investigate the genetic basis of wing plasticity variation. Previous reports have suggested an ecological association between body coloration and wing plasticity strength in the pea aphid, so we tested the hypothesis that the body colour determination locus (<i>tor</i>) associated with wing plasticity variation. We discover that there is no relationship between body colour and wing plasticity in natural populations or in a genetic mapping population. We also localise the <i>tor</i> locus to the third autosome, whereas it was previously thought to be on the first autosome, a finding that will be important for future studies of the locus. We find that the presence of the bacterial symbiont <i>Regiella</i> is associated with higher levels of wing plasticity. Genome-wide association analysis of wing plasticity variation did not reveal an impact of the <i>tor</i> locus, consistent with independence of body colour and wing plasticity. This analysis implicated one possible candidate gene—a Hox gene, <i>abdominal-A</i>—underlying wing plasticity variation, although SNPs do not reach the level of genome-wide significance and therefore will require further study. Our study highlights that plasticity variation is complex, impacted by a bacterial symbiont and genetic variation, but not influenced by body colour.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Body Colour, Symbionts and Genomic Regions on the Pea Aphid Wing Plasticity Variation\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Gregory, Rose M. H. Driscoll, Benjamin J. Parker, Jennifer A. Brisson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mec.17660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Adaptive phenotypic plasticity describes the phenomenon in which a single genotype can produce a variety of phenotypes that match their environments. Like any trait, plasticity is a phenotype that can exhibit variation, but despite the ecological importance of plasticity variation, little is known about its genetic basis. Here we use the pea aphid to investigate the genetic basis of wing plasticity variation. Previous reports have suggested an ecological association between body coloration and wing plasticity strength in the pea aphid, so we tested the hypothesis that the body colour determination locus (<i>tor</i>) associated with wing plasticity variation. We discover that there is no relationship between body colour and wing plasticity in natural populations or in a genetic mapping population. We also localise the <i>tor</i> locus to the third autosome, whereas it was previously thought to be on the first autosome, a finding that will be important for future studies of the locus. We find that the presence of the bacterial symbiont <i>Regiella</i> is associated with higher levels of wing plasticity. Genome-wide association analysis of wing plasticity variation did not reveal an impact of the <i>tor</i> locus, consistent with independence of body colour and wing plasticity. This analysis implicated one possible candidate gene—a Hox gene, <i>abdominal-A</i>—underlying wing plasticity variation, although SNPs do not reach the level of genome-wide significance and therefore will require further study. Our study highlights that plasticity variation is complex, impacted by a bacterial symbiont and genetic variation, but not influenced by body colour.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Ecology\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.17660\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.17660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacts of Body Colour, Symbionts and Genomic Regions on the Pea Aphid Wing Plasticity Variation
Adaptive phenotypic plasticity describes the phenomenon in which a single genotype can produce a variety of phenotypes that match their environments. Like any trait, plasticity is a phenotype that can exhibit variation, but despite the ecological importance of plasticity variation, little is known about its genetic basis. Here we use the pea aphid to investigate the genetic basis of wing plasticity variation. Previous reports have suggested an ecological association between body coloration and wing plasticity strength in the pea aphid, so we tested the hypothesis that the body colour determination locus (tor) associated with wing plasticity variation. We discover that there is no relationship between body colour and wing plasticity in natural populations or in a genetic mapping population. We also localise the tor locus to the third autosome, whereas it was previously thought to be on the first autosome, a finding that will be important for future studies of the locus. We find that the presence of the bacterial symbiont Regiella is associated with higher levels of wing plasticity. Genome-wide association analysis of wing plasticity variation did not reveal an impact of the tor locus, consistent with independence of body colour and wing plasticity. This analysis implicated one possible candidate gene—a Hox gene, abdominal-A—underlying wing plasticity variation, although SNPs do not reach the level of genome-wide significance and therefore will require further study. Our study highlights that plasticity variation is complex, impacted by a bacterial symbiont and genetic variation, but not influenced by body colour.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include:
* population structure and phylogeography
* reproductive strategies
* relatedness and kin selection
* sex allocation
* population genetic theory
* analytical methods development
* conservation genetics
* speciation genetics
* microbial biodiversity
* evolutionary dynamics of QTLs
* ecological interactions
* molecular adaptation and environmental genomics
* impact of genetically modified organisms