对加密资产交易、执法和遗产规划的分析

IF 7.1 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Sirajo Aliyu , Norazlina Abd Wahab , Nur Syaedah Kamis
{"title":"对加密资产交易、执法和遗产规划的分析","authors":"Sirajo Aliyu ,&nbsp;Norazlina Abd Wahab ,&nbsp;Nur Syaedah Kamis","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines crypto-asset trading, focusing on regulatory violations that lead to enforcement actions and the impact of estate planning after a digital asset holder's death. We review the literature on crypto-asset estate planning and explore lessons from Islamic finance regarding crypto assets. We then use quantitative analysis to compare price-volume relationships in Islamicoin and Bitcoin. To strengthen our analysis, we employ the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, parametric survival analysis, and the Probit model. Our findings show that Islamicoin's trade volume predicts market price changes more often than Bitcoin's, which seems to be influenced by factors other than trade volume. Further investigation reveals that securities regulators are increasingly enforcing rules against crypto-trading violations. These violations typically occur when trading activity decreases while prices increase. We also find that widespread price changes tend to motivate people to violate the regulations over time. Recently, positive price changes, rather than trade volume, have been the main factor influencing regulatory violations. However, trade effects were observed later in some of our models. Given these findings, we conclude that regulators need to improve digital assets Act to address estate planning issues, in addition to protecting investors. The paper ends with policy recommendations and suggestions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 206-226"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of crypto-asset trade, enforcement, and estate planning\",\"authors\":\"Sirajo Aliyu ,&nbsp;Norazlina Abd Wahab ,&nbsp;Nur Syaedah Kamis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bir.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines crypto-asset trading, focusing on regulatory violations that lead to enforcement actions and the impact of estate planning after a digital asset holder's death. We review the literature on crypto-asset estate planning and explore lessons from Islamic finance regarding crypto assets. We then use quantitative analysis to compare price-volume relationships in Islamicoin and Bitcoin. To strengthen our analysis, we employ the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, parametric survival analysis, and the Probit model. Our findings show that Islamicoin's trade volume predicts market price changes more often than Bitcoin's, which seems to be influenced by factors other than trade volume. Further investigation reveals that securities regulators are increasingly enforcing rules against crypto-trading violations. These violations typically occur when trading activity decreases while prices increase. We also find that widespread price changes tend to motivate people to violate the regulations over time. Recently, positive price changes, rather than trade volume, have been the main factor influencing regulatory violations. However, trade effects were observed later in some of our models. Given these findings, we conclude that regulators need to improve digital assets Act to address estate planning issues, in addition to protecting investors. The paper ends with policy recommendations and suggestions for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 206-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024001637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024001637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了加密资产交易,重点关注导致执法行动的监管违规行为,以及数字资产持有人去世后遗产规划的影响。我们回顾了关于加密资产遗产规划的文献,并探讨了伊斯兰金融在加密资产方面的经验教训。然后,我们使用定量分析来比较伊斯兰币和比特币的价格-数量关系。为了加强我们的分析,我们采用了Kaplan-Meier生存估计、参数生存分析和Probit模型。我们的研究结果表明,Islamicoin的交易量比比特币更能预测市场价格变化,这似乎受到交易量以外的因素的影响。进一步的调查显示,证券监管机构正在越来越多地执行针对加密交易违规行为的规定。这些违规行为通常发生在交易活动减少而价格上涨的时候。我们还发现,随着时间的推移,普遍的价格变化往往会促使人们违反规定。最近,积极的价格变化,而不是交易量,已经成为影响违规行为的主要因素。然而,贸易效应后来在我们的一些模型中被观察到。鉴于这些发现,我们得出结论,除了保护投资者外,监管机构还需要改进数字资产法案,以解决遗产规划问题。文章最后提出了政策建议和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of crypto-asset trade, enforcement, and estate planning
This study examines crypto-asset trading, focusing on regulatory violations that lead to enforcement actions and the impact of estate planning after a digital asset holder's death. We review the literature on crypto-asset estate planning and explore lessons from Islamic finance regarding crypto assets. We then use quantitative analysis to compare price-volume relationships in Islamicoin and Bitcoin. To strengthen our analysis, we employ the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, parametric survival analysis, and the Probit model. Our findings show that Islamicoin's trade volume predicts market price changes more often than Bitcoin's, which seems to be influenced by factors other than trade volume. Further investigation reveals that securities regulators are increasingly enforcing rules against crypto-trading violations. These violations typically occur when trading activity decreases while prices increase. We also find that widespread price changes tend to motivate people to violate the regulations over time. Recently, positive price changes, rather than trade volume, have been the main factor influencing regulatory violations. However, trade effects were observed later in some of our models. Given these findings, we conclude that regulators need to improve digital assets Act to address estate planning issues, in addition to protecting investors. The paper ends with policy recommendations and suggestions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
130
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信