IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Udita Sanga , Maja Schlüter
{"title":"Stories, simulations and narratives: Collaboratively exploring food security and agricultural innovation in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Udita Sanga ,&nbsp;Maja Schlüter","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Food insecurity remains a global challenge, with differing narratives shaping interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. The “crisis narrative,” favored by aid agencies, links insecurity to production issues, advocating agricultural innovations. Meanwhile, the “chronic poverty narrative,” reflected in African policy, ties insecurity to farmer poverty, emphasizing livelihood and economic solutions. Narrative subjectivity can lead to uncritical privileging of certain understandings and solutions, necessitating a critical exploration of contexts, causes, and solutions to food insecurity in the region. Our research addresses the need to understand and illustrate the complex problem of food insecurity in the region.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study employs a mixed-method approach, combining collaborative storytelling, model exploration, and scenario analysis, to investigate food security, agricultural innovation, and climate adaptation in Mali, West Africa.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We developed a three-stage methodology represented as a story arc: beginning (exposition and problem statement), development (action), and completion (solution), providing a cohesive narrative framework. The arc unfolds with the story exposition introducing characters, plot, and problem statement. The story development includes participant-led model simulations and modeler-led scenario analysis. The story completion integrates insights from model simulations and scenario analysis to develop the collective understanding of the narratives surrounding food (in)security.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>This study generates several insights that highlight the inherent complexities within agricultural innovation systems that emerge from the non-linear dynamic interaction of actors operating across scales that contribute to food insecurity. We redirect the focus of narratives of causes (and subsequent solutions) of food insecurity from solely climate-driven production losses and poverty to the complex interplay of climate, agroecology, innovation networks, risk perception, innovation beliefs, desires, and knowledge transmission. A shared narrative emerges, characterizing food security as a complex adaptive system influenced by factors such as climate-induced production variability, agroecological heterogeneity, network structures and climate risk perception. The study underscores the methodological value of collaborative storytelling and model simulation to enable a structured and reflective exploration of these complex systems. By transforming participants into co-creators of knowledge, this methodology fosters systems thinking, turning abstract systemic relationships into tangible, actionable insights.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Our study demonstrates the need to critically reevaluate the role of narratives in shaping agricultural innovation systems and their capacity to transform food systems toward enhanced sustainability and food security. Our participatory and systems-driven approach offers a pathway to more adaptive and effective interventions in the face of complex, dynamic challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104241"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内容提要粮食不安全仍然是一个全球性挑战,撒哈拉以南非洲地区的干预措施受到不同说法的影响。受援助机构青睐的 "危机叙事 "将不安全与生产问题联系起来,倡导农业创新。与此同时,反映在非洲政策中的 "长期贫困叙事 "将不安全与农民贫困联系在一起,强调生计和经济解决方案。叙事的主观性可能导致不加批判地优先考虑某些理解和解决方案,因此有必要对该地区粮食不安全的背景、原因和解决方案进行批判性探索。本研究采用混合方法,将合作讲故事、模型探索和情景分析相结合,调查西非马里的粮食安全、农业创新和气候适应情况。方法我们开发了一种三阶段方法,以故事弧线表示:开始(阐述和问题陈述)、发展(行动)和完成(解决方案),提供了一个有内涵的叙事框架。故事弧线由故事阐述展开,介绍人物、情节和问题陈述。故事发展包括参与者主导的模型模拟和建模者主导的情景分析。结果与结论:本研究提出了若干见解,强调了农业创新系统中固有的复杂性,这些复杂性来自于导致粮食不安全的跨规模行动者之间的非线性动态互动。我们将有关粮食不安全原因(及随后的解决方案)的叙述重点从单纯的气候驱动生产损失和贫困转向气候、农业生态学、创新网络、风险认知、创新信念、愿望和知识传播的复杂相互作用。研究中出现了一种共同的叙述方式,将粮食安全描述为一个复杂的适应系统,受到气候引起的生产变异性、农业生态异质性、网络结构和气候风险认知等因素的影响。这项研究强调了合作讲故事和模型模拟的方法论价值,有助于对这些复杂系统进行结构化和反思性的探索。通过将参与者转化为知识的共同创造者,这种方法促进了系统思维,将抽象的系统关系转化为具体的、可操作的见解。意义我们的研究表明,有必要批判性地重新评估叙事在塑造农业创新系统中的作用,以及它们将粮食系统转化为增强可持续性和粮食安全的能力。面对复杂多变的挑战,我们的参与式和系统驱动方法为采取更具适应性和更有效的干预措施提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stories, simulations and narratives: Collaboratively exploring food security and agricultural innovation in sub-Saharan Africa

Stories, simulations and narratives: Collaboratively exploring food security and agricultural innovation in sub-Saharan Africa

CONTEXT

Food insecurity remains a global challenge, with differing narratives shaping interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. The “crisis narrative,” favored by aid agencies, links insecurity to production issues, advocating agricultural innovations. Meanwhile, the “chronic poverty narrative,” reflected in African policy, ties insecurity to farmer poverty, emphasizing livelihood and economic solutions. Narrative subjectivity can lead to uncritical privileging of certain understandings and solutions, necessitating a critical exploration of contexts, causes, and solutions to food insecurity in the region. Our research addresses the need to understand and illustrate the complex problem of food insecurity in the region.

OBJECTIVE

This study employs a mixed-method approach, combining collaborative storytelling, model exploration, and scenario analysis, to investigate food security, agricultural innovation, and climate adaptation in Mali, West Africa.

METHODS

We developed a three-stage methodology represented as a story arc: beginning (exposition and problem statement), development (action), and completion (solution), providing a cohesive narrative framework. The arc unfolds with the story exposition introducing characters, plot, and problem statement. The story development includes participant-led model simulations and modeler-led scenario analysis. The story completion integrates insights from model simulations and scenario analysis to develop the collective understanding of the narratives surrounding food (in)security.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This study generates several insights that highlight the inherent complexities within agricultural innovation systems that emerge from the non-linear dynamic interaction of actors operating across scales that contribute to food insecurity. We redirect the focus of narratives of causes (and subsequent solutions) of food insecurity from solely climate-driven production losses and poverty to the complex interplay of climate, agroecology, innovation networks, risk perception, innovation beliefs, desires, and knowledge transmission. A shared narrative emerges, characterizing food security as a complex adaptive system influenced by factors such as climate-induced production variability, agroecological heterogeneity, network structures and climate risk perception. The study underscores the methodological value of collaborative storytelling and model simulation to enable a structured and reflective exploration of these complex systems. By transforming participants into co-creators of knowledge, this methodology fosters systems thinking, turning abstract systemic relationships into tangible, actionable insights.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study demonstrates the need to critically reevaluate the role of narratives in shaping agricultural innovation systems and their capacity to transform food systems toward enhanced sustainability and food security. Our participatory and systems-driven approach offers a pathway to more adaptive and effective interventions in the face of complex, dynamic challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信