评估印度农场一级的农业可持续性:采用混合方法进行比较研究

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Niloofar Abed , Masoud Barati Kakolaki , Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh , Sabarinath Sankarannair , Ramu Murugan , Bankaru Swamy Soundharajan , Raji Pushpalatha
{"title":"评估印度农场一级的农业可持续性:采用混合方法进行比较研究","authors":"Niloofar Abed ,&nbsp;Masoud Barati Kakolaki ,&nbsp;Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh ,&nbsp;Sabarinath Sankarannair ,&nbsp;Ramu Murugan ,&nbsp;Bankaru Swamy Soundharajan ,&nbsp;Raji Pushpalatha","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agricultural sustainability in rural India is vital for ensuring food security and livelihoods, particularly for small-scale farmers. Many rural communities exhibit a blend of sustainable and unsustainable farming practices, affecting both their agricultural productivity and resilience in the face of environmental and socio-economic challenges.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural practices within rural farming communities. The goal is to identify weaknesses in resource management and productivity while proposing targeted interventions that promote sustainable practices in line with Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, interviews, and sub-indicators of sustainability. The research modified the FAO methodology for assessing agricultural sustainability and tailored it to local conditions. The Saiful participatory framework was further adapted to ensure stakeholder participation and the inclusion of culturally relevant practices. A visualized indicator framework was also developed to track sustainability progress effectively.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Key findings reveal that while these communities exhibit potential for improved sustainability, critical weaknesses in resource management and land use hinder productivity. The study also highlighted positive elements, such as community-driven initiatives that enhance sustainable practices. The sub-indicator analysis identified priority areas for intervention, and the visualized framework provides a practical tool for monitoring farm-level sustainability. Results suggest the need for region-specific policies to address the unique challenges faced by rural communities.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study contributes to the assessment of agricultural sustainability by developing a locally adapted framework that can be applied across various rural settings. The findings provide insights for policymakers, agronomists, and rural development practitioners, emphasizing the importance of engaging local stakeholders and fostering sustainable practices that align with national and global sustainability goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability in India: A comparative study using a mixed-method approach\",\"authors\":\"Niloofar Abed ,&nbsp;Masoud Barati Kakolaki ,&nbsp;Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh ,&nbsp;Sabarinath Sankarannair ,&nbsp;Ramu Murugan ,&nbsp;Bankaru Swamy Soundharajan ,&nbsp;Raji Pushpalatha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agricultural sustainability in rural India is vital for ensuring food security and livelihoods, particularly for small-scale farmers. Many rural communities exhibit a blend of sustainable and unsustainable farming practices, affecting both their agricultural productivity and resilience in the face of environmental and socio-economic challenges.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural practices within rural farming communities. The goal is to identify weaknesses in resource management and productivity while proposing targeted interventions that promote sustainable practices in line with Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, interviews, and sub-indicators of sustainability. The research modified the FAO methodology for assessing agricultural sustainability and tailored it to local conditions. The Saiful participatory framework was further adapted to ensure stakeholder participation and the inclusion of culturally relevant practices. A visualized indicator framework was also developed to track sustainability progress effectively.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Key findings reveal that while these communities exhibit potential for improved sustainability, critical weaknesses in resource management and land use hinder productivity. The study also highlighted positive elements, such as community-driven initiatives that enhance sustainable practices. The sub-indicator analysis identified priority areas for intervention, and the visualized framework provides a practical tool for monitoring farm-level sustainability. Results suggest the need for region-specific policies to address the unique challenges faced by rural communities.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study contributes to the assessment of agricultural sustainability by developing a locally adapted framework that can be applied across various rural settings. The findings provide insights for policymakers, agronomists, and rural development practitioners, emphasizing the importance of engaging local stakeholders and fostering sustainable practices that align with national and global sustainability goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003731\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003731","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability in India: A comparative study using a mixed-method approach

Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability in India: A comparative study using a mixed-method approach

CONTEXT

Agricultural sustainability in rural India is vital for ensuring food security and livelihoods, particularly for small-scale farmers. Many rural communities exhibit a blend of sustainable and unsustainable farming practices, affecting both their agricultural productivity and resilience in the face of environmental and socio-economic challenges.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural practices within rural farming communities. The goal is to identify weaknesses in resource management and productivity while proposing targeted interventions that promote sustainable practices in line with Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1.

METHODS

A mixed-method approach was adopted, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data through surveys, interviews, and sub-indicators of sustainability. The research modified the FAO methodology for assessing agricultural sustainability and tailored it to local conditions. The Saiful participatory framework was further adapted to ensure stakeholder participation and the inclusion of culturally relevant practices. A visualized indicator framework was also developed to track sustainability progress effectively.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Key findings reveal that while these communities exhibit potential for improved sustainability, critical weaknesses in resource management and land use hinder productivity. The study also highlighted positive elements, such as community-driven initiatives that enhance sustainable practices. The sub-indicator analysis identified priority areas for intervention, and the visualized framework provides a practical tool for monitoring farm-level sustainability. Results suggest the need for region-specific policies to address the unique challenges faced by rural communities.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study contributes to the assessment of agricultural sustainability by developing a locally adapted framework that can be applied across various rural settings. The findings provide insights for policymakers, agronomists, and rural development practitioners, emphasizing the importance of engaging local stakeholders and fostering sustainable practices that align with national and global sustainability goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信