{"title":"A scoping review of research on individual differences in the testing effect paradigm","authors":"Rachel N. Smith-Peirce, Andrew C. Butler","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When compared with re-studying, practicing retrieval of information from memory leads to better retention and transfer of learning, a finding called the testing effect. Although much research has established the generalizability of the benefits of retrieval practice across a variety of contextual factors (i.e., encoding conditions, retrieval conditions, and materials used), only a handful of studies have examined whether individual differences influence the extent to which learners benefit from this strategy. The purpose of the present scoping review is to examine existing research on individual differences within the testing effect paradigm. A total of 20 studies that investigate 20 individual difference constructs were included and analyzed. Surprisingly, the majority of the studies found no significant relationship between the individual difference construct(s) of interest and the magnitude of the testing effect. This central finding is discussed in relation to both theoretical explanations of the testing effect and recommendations for educational practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400195X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A scoping review of research on individual differences in the testing effect paradigm
When compared with re-studying, practicing retrieval of information from memory leads to better retention and transfer of learning, a finding called the testing effect. Although much research has established the generalizability of the benefits of retrieval practice across a variety of contextual factors (i.e., encoding conditions, retrieval conditions, and materials used), only a handful of studies have examined whether individual differences influence the extent to which learners benefit from this strategy. The purpose of the present scoping review is to examine existing research on individual differences within the testing effect paradigm. A total of 20 studies that investigate 20 individual difference constructs were included and analyzed. Surprisingly, the majority of the studies found no significant relationship between the individual difference construct(s) of interest and the magnitude of the testing effect. This central finding is discussed in relation to both theoretical explanations of the testing effect and recommendations for educational practice.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).