{"title":"Uso“谎言”还是hontoo“真相”?日语信息中的两个词汇响应标记","authors":"Yuki Arita","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This conversation analytic study examines two response tokens <em>uso</em> and <em>hontoo</em> in Japanese informing sequences. Despite their frequent use in informing sequences, little empirical research has been done on the interactional properties of the two tokens. To explore similarities and differences between uso and hontoo, this study investigates their workings in two types of informings: informings done with a minimal number of turn-constructional units, and informings that require a largely extended turn-at-talk. In so doing, the present research reveals how uso and hontoo serve as news receipts and newsmarks at different sequential locations and how they lead to different action trajectories in the subsequent turns. By delineating the interactional features of uso and hontoo, this study aims to provide perspectives on how particular tokens act as responses to informings in a language-sensitive manner and yet also in ways similar to specific tokens in other languages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"235 ","pages":"Pages 182-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uso “lie” or hontoo “truth”?: Two lexical response tokens in Japanese informings\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Arita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2024.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This conversation analytic study examines two response tokens <em>uso</em> and <em>hontoo</em> in Japanese informing sequences. Despite their frequent use in informing sequences, little empirical research has been done on the interactional properties of the two tokens. To explore similarities and differences between uso and hontoo, this study investigates their workings in two types of informings: informings done with a minimal number of turn-constructional units, and informings that require a largely extended turn-at-talk. In so doing, the present research reveals how uso and hontoo serve as news receipts and newsmarks at different sequential locations and how they lead to different action trajectories in the subsequent turns. By delineating the interactional features of uso and hontoo, this study aims to provide perspectives on how particular tokens act as responses to informings in a language-sensitive manner and yet also in ways similar to specific tokens in other languages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 182-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624002273\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624002273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uso “lie” or hontoo “truth”?: Two lexical response tokens in Japanese informings
This conversation analytic study examines two response tokens uso and hontoo in Japanese informing sequences. Despite their frequent use in informing sequences, little empirical research has been done on the interactional properties of the two tokens. To explore similarities and differences between uso and hontoo, this study investigates their workings in two types of informings: informings done with a minimal number of turn-constructional units, and informings that require a largely extended turn-at-talk. In so doing, the present research reveals how uso and hontoo serve as news receipts and newsmarks at different sequential locations and how they lead to different action trajectories in the subsequent turns. By delineating the interactional features of uso and hontoo, this study aims to provide perspectives on how particular tokens act as responses to informings in a language-sensitive manner and yet also in ways similar to specific tokens in other languages.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.