德国兽医卫生保健工作者的大规模狂犬病暴露:管理、免疫反应和暴露后预防的耐受性

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lennart Lemmermann , Jonathan Remppis , Sabine Bélard , Florian Steiner
{"title":"德国兽医卫生保健工作者的大规模狂犬病暴露:管理、免疫反应和暴露后预防的耐受性","authors":"Lennart Lemmermann ,&nbsp;Jonathan Remppis ,&nbsp;Sabine Bélard ,&nbsp;Florian Steiner","doi":"10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease caused by <em>Rabies lyssavirus</em>, primarily transmitted through dog bites. In 2008, Germany was declared free from terrestrial rabies by the WOAH. However, illegal pet imports can still lead to rabies exposure, as seen in the 2021 case of a rabid puppy illegally imported to Germany, resulting in a mass exposure incident.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study assessed the post-exposure management of 39 veterinary clinic staff exposed to the rabid puppy, focusing on the practicability, immunogenicity, and tolerability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Data was collected from patient records and for follow-up by phone using standardized case record forms, entered into an Excel database, and analyzed descriptively. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen (8452022BO2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exposed individuals received varying PEP regimens based on vaccination status and exposure level, including possible aerosol exposure. Most followed the Essen-Scheme, with some receiving human rabies immune globulin (hRIG). All developed protective antibody titers, and adverse reactions were generally mild.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case highlights challenges in rabies mass exposure management and emphasizes needs for continued preparedness, resource allocation and education about rabies, even in regions considered rabies-free.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19577,"journal":{"name":"One Health","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100978"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass rabies exposure of veterinary health care workers in Germany: Management, immune response, and tolerability of post exposure-prophylaxis\",\"authors\":\"Lennart Lemmermann ,&nbsp;Jonathan Remppis ,&nbsp;Sabine Bélard ,&nbsp;Florian Steiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease caused by <em>Rabies lyssavirus</em>, primarily transmitted through dog bites. In 2008, Germany was declared free from terrestrial rabies by the WOAH. However, illegal pet imports can still lead to rabies exposure, as seen in the 2021 case of a rabid puppy illegally imported to Germany, resulting in a mass exposure incident.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study assessed the post-exposure management of 39 veterinary clinic staff exposed to the rabid puppy, focusing on the practicability, immunogenicity, and tolerability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Data was collected from patient records and for follow-up by phone using standardized case record forms, entered into an Excel database, and analyzed descriptively. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen (8452022BO2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exposed individuals received varying PEP regimens based on vaccination status and exposure level, including possible aerosol exposure. Most followed the Essen-Scheme, with some receiving human rabies immune globulin (hRIG). All developed protective antibody titers, and adverse reactions were generally mild.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case highlights challenges in rabies mass exposure management and emphasizes needs for continued preparedness, resource allocation and education about rabies, even in regions considered rabies-free.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142500014X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142500014X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

狂犬病是一种由狂犬裂解病毒引起的致命人畜共患疾病,主要通过狗咬伤传播。2008年,世界卫生组织宣布德国已无陆地狂犬病。然而,非法宠物进口仍然可能导致狂犬病暴露,正如2021年德国非法进口狂犬病幼犬的案例所示,导致大规模暴露事件。方法回顾性评价39名兽医诊所工作人员接触狂犬病幼犬的暴露后管理情况,重点评价暴露后预防(PEP)的实用性、免疫原性和耐受性。使用标准化病例记录表格从患者记录和电话随访中收集数据,输入Excel数据库,并进行描述性分析。获得了宾根大学伦理委员会(8452022BO2)的伦理批准。结果暴露个体根据疫苗接种状况和暴露水平(包括可能的气溶胶暴露)接受不同的PEP方案。大多数人遵循艾森方案,其中一些人接受人狂犬病免疫球蛋白(hRIG)。所有患者均出现保护性抗体滴度,不良反应一般较轻。结论本病例突出了狂犬病大规模暴露管理方面的挑战,并强调了即使在被认为无狂犬病的地区也需要继续做好准备、分配资源和开展狂犬病教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mass rabies exposure of veterinary health care workers in Germany: Management, immune response, and tolerability of post exposure-prophylaxis

Background

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease caused by Rabies lyssavirus, primarily transmitted through dog bites. In 2008, Germany was declared free from terrestrial rabies by the WOAH. However, illegal pet imports can still lead to rabies exposure, as seen in the 2021 case of a rabid puppy illegally imported to Germany, resulting in a mass exposure incident.

Methods

This retrospective study assessed the post-exposure management of 39 veterinary clinic staff exposed to the rabid puppy, focusing on the practicability, immunogenicity, and tolerability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Data was collected from patient records and for follow-up by phone using standardized case record forms, entered into an Excel database, and analyzed descriptively. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen (8452022BO2).

Results

Exposed individuals received varying PEP regimens based on vaccination status and exposure level, including possible aerosol exposure. Most followed the Essen-Scheme, with some receiving human rabies immune globulin (hRIG). All developed protective antibody titers, and adverse reactions were generally mild.

Conclusion

This case highlights challenges in rabies mass exposure management and emphasizes needs for continued preparedness, resource allocation and education about rabies, even in regions considered rabies-free.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
One Health
One Health Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: One Health - a Gold Open Access journal. The mission of One Health is to provide a platform for rapid communication of high quality scientific knowledge on inter- and intra-species pathogen transmission, bringing together leading experts in virology, bacteriology, parasitology, mycology, vectors and vector-borne diseases, tropical health, veterinary sciences, pathology, immunology, food safety, mathematical modelling, epidemiology, public health research and emergency preparedness. As a Gold Open Access journal, a fee is payable on acceptance of the paper. Please see the Guide for Authors for more information. Submissions to the following categories are welcome: Virology, Bacteriology, Parasitology, Mycology, Vectors and vector-borne diseases, Co-infections and co-morbidities, Disease spatial surveillance, Modelling, Tropical Health, Discovery, Ecosystem Health, Public Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信