安德烈·德尔·萨托和乔瓦尼·安东尼奥·索里亚尼的《感恩圣母》:一项多分析研究

IF 3.5 2区 综合性期刊 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Simona Raneri , Giulia Lorenzetti , Francesca Puccinelli , Beatrice Merciadri , Vincenzo Palleschi , Simonetta Rota , Stefano Legnaioli
{"title":"安德烈·德尔·萨托和乔瓦尼·安东尼奥·索里亚尼的《感恩圣母》:一项多分析研究","authors":"Simona Raneri ,&nbsp;Giulia Lorenzetti ,&nbsp;Francesca Puccinelli ,&nbsp;Beatrice Merciadri ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Palleschi ,&nbsp;Simonetta Rota ,&nbsp;Stefano Legnaioli","doi":"10.1016/j.culher.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The recent restoration of the painting “Enthroned Virgin Mary with Child, St. John the Baptist, St. Francis, St. Bartholomew and St. Jerome” (also known as “Madonna delle Grazie”<em>-</em> Oil on wood<em>,</em> 235 × 194 cm) carried out by the restorers of the Opera del Duomo in Pisa (2020–2021) provided the occasion for a multi-analytical study of this sixteenth-century masterpiece. We learn from Vasari's <em>Lives of the Artists</em> that the panel was commissioned to Andrea del Sarto (Andrea d'Agnolo, Florence 1486 – Florence 1530) by the friars of the Monastery of St. Francis in Pisa. The painting was left unfinished by Andrea del Sarto due to his sudden death during the plague in Florence in 1530 and was completed eight years later by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani (Florence, 1492 – Florence, 1544). The division of work between Andrea del Sarto and Sogliani in the painting remains a subject of debate. Art historians have largely agreed on the hypothesis that almost the entire painted surface, should be attributed to Sogliani. However, the attribution of the composition is still controversial; it is unclear whether the design is entirely by Andrea del Sarto, or if certain parts were reinterpreted by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani.</div><div>To contribute analytical data to this debate, a novel multispectral approach incorporating the Interesting Feature Finding (IFF) method was utilized to examine the painting. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) and micro-Raman analyses were conducted to characterise the pigments used by the artist(s) in different parts of the masterpiece. The multispectral analysis revealed significant differences between the underdrawings - potentially attributable to Andrea del Sarto - and the painted surface. The ED-XRF and micro-Raman results do not exclude the possibility that parts of the painting were executed by del Sarto. The IFF method also uncovered several “<em>pentimenti</em>”, including a small (human?) figure, which opened intriguing comparisons with other works by Andrea del Sarto.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 328-333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘Madonna delle Grazie’ by Andrea del Sarto and Giovanni Antonio Sogliani: A multi-analytical study\",\"authors\":\"Simona Raneri ,&nbsp;Giulia Lorenzetti ,&nbsp;Francesca Puccinelli ,&nbsp;Beatrice Merciadri ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Palleschi ,&nbsp;Simonetta Rota ,&nbsp;Stefano Legnaioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.culher.2024.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The recent restoration of the painting “Enthroned Virgin Mary with Child, St. John the Baptist, St. Francis, St. Bartholomew and St. Jerome” (also known as “Madonna delle Grazie”<em>-</em> Oil on wood<em>,</em> 235 × 194 cm) carried out by the restorers of the Opera del Duomo in Pisa (2020–2021) provided the occasion for a multi-analytical study of this sixteenth-century masterpiece. We learn from Vasari's <em>Lives of the Artists</em> that the panel was commissioned to Andrea del Sarto (Andrea d'Agnolo, Florence 1486 – Florence 1530) by the friars of the Monastery of St. Francis in Pisa. The painting was left unfinished by Andrea del Sarto due to his sudden death during the plague in Florence in 1530 and was completed eight years later by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani (Florence, 1492 – Florence, 1544). The division of work between Andrea del Sarto and Sogliani in the painting remains a subject of debate. Art historians have largely agreed on the hypothesis that almost the entire painted surface, should be attributed to Sogliani. However, the attribution of the composition is still controversial; it is unclear whether the design is entirely by Andrea del Sarto, or if certain parts were reinterpreted by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani.</div><div>To contribute analytical data to this debate, a novel multispectral approach incorporating the Interesting Feature Finding (IFF) method was utilized to examine the painting. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) and micro-Raman analyses were conducted to characterise the pigments used by the artist(s) in different parts of the masterpiece. The multispectral analysis revealed significant differences between the underdrawings - potentially attributable to Andrea del Sarto - and the painted surface. The ED-XRF and micro-Raman results do not exclude the possibility that parts of the painting were executed by del Sarto. The IFF method also uncovered several “<em>pentimenti</em>”, including a small (human?) figure, which opened intriguing comparisons with other works by Andrea del Sarto.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 328-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424002632\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424002632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近由比萨大教堂歌剧院(2020-2021)修复者进行的“圣母玛利亚与孩子,施洗者圣约翰,圣弗朗西斯,圣巴塞洛缪和圣杰罗姆”(也被称为“圣母玛利亚”-木面油,235 × 194厘米)的修复工作为这一16世纪的杰作提供了多分析研究的机会。我们从瓦萨里的《艺术家的生活》中得知,这幅画是由比萨圣弗朗西斯修道院的修士委托安德烈·德尔·萨托(安德烈·德·阿格诺洛,1486年至1530年,佛罗伦萨)创作的。这幅画是安德里亚·德尔·萨托因1530年在佛罗伦萨的瘟疫中突然去世而未完成的,8年后由乔瓦尼·安东尼奥·索里亚尼(佛罗伦萨,1492 - 1544)完成。在这幅画中,安德里亚·德尔·萨托和索里亚尼之间的分工仍然是一个有争议的话题。艺术史学家基本上同意这样一个假设,即几乎整个绘画表面都应该归功于索里亚尼。然而,该作品的归属仍存在争议;目前尚不清楚该设计是否完全由安德里亚·德尔·萨托设计,或者某些部分是否由乔瓦尼·安东尼奥·索里亚尼重新诠释。为了为这场辩论提供分析数据,一种新的多光谱方法结合了有趣的特征发现(IFF)方法来检查这幅画。此外,进行了能量色散x射线荧光(ED-XRF)和微拉曼分析,以表征艺术家在杰作的不同部分使用的颜料。多光谱分析揭示了底纹(可能是安德里亚·德尔·萨托的作品)和喷漆表面之间的显著差异。ED-XRF和微拉曼结果不排除部分画作是由德尔·萨托完成的可能性。IFF方法还发现了一些“笔触”,包括一个小的(人?)人物,它与安德里亚·德尔·萨托的其他作品进行了有趣的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘Madonna delle Grazie’ by Andrea del Sarto and Giovanni Antonio Sogliani: A multi-analytical study
The recent restoration of the painting “Enthroned Virgin Mary with Child, St. John the Baptist, St. Francis, St. Bartholomew and St. Jerome” (also known as “Madonna delle Grazie”- Oil on wood, 235 × 194 cm) carried out by the restorers of the Opera del Duomo in Pisa (2020–2021) provided the occasion for a multi-analytical study of this sixteenth-century masterpiece. We learn from Vasari's Lives of the Artists that the panel was commissioned to Andrea del Sarto (Andrea d'Agnolo, Florence 1486 – Florence 1530) by the friars of the Monastery of St. Francis in Pisa. The painting was left unfinished by Andrea del Sarto due to his sudden death during the plague in Florence in 1530 and was completed eight years later by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani (Florence, 1492 – Florence, 1544). The division of work between Andrea del Sarto and Sogliani in the painting remains a subject of debate. Art historians have largely agreed on the hypothesis that almost the entire painted surface, should be attributed to Sogliani. However, the attribution of the composition is still controversial; it is unclear whether the design is entirely by Andrea del Sarto, or if certain parts were reinterpreted by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani.
To contribute analytical data to this debate, a novel multispectral approach incorporating the Interesting Feature Finding (IFF) method was utilized to examine the painting. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) and micro-Raman analyses were conducted to characterise the pigments used by the artist(s) in different parts of the masterpiece. The multispectral analysis revealed significant differences between the underdrawings - potentially attributable to Andrea del Sarto - and the painted surface. The ED-XRF and micro-Raman results do not exclude the possibility that parts of the painting were executed by del Sarto. The IFF method also uncovered several “pentimenti”, including a small (human?) figure, which opened intriguing comparisons with other works by Andrea del Sarto.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cultural Heritage
Journal of Cultural Heritage 综合性期刊-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
166
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cultural Heritage publishes original papers which comprise previously unpublished data and present innovative methods concerning all aspects of science and technology of cultural heritage as well as interpretation and theoretical issues related to preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信