用ATR - FTIR评价黏液从帆布上去除天然胶粘剂(gacha)的效果。第一次结果

IF 3.5 2区 综合性期刊 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Marina Palma Prieto , Marta Pérez-Estébanez , Sonia Santos Gómez , José Manuel de la Roja , Carmen Ahedo Pino
{"title":"用ATR - FTIR评价黏液从帆布上去除天然胶粘剂(gacha)的效果。第一次结果","authors":"Marina Palma Prieto ,&nbsp;Marta Pérez-Estébanez ,&nbsp;Sonia Santos Gómez ,&nbsp;José Manuel de la Roja ,&nbsp;Carmen Ahedo Pino","doi":"10.1016/j.culher.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nowadays the use of gelled systems to remove natural glues from cultural artefacts is very common, as they allow the application of controlled humidity to sensitive surfaces. These cleaning systems can be of natural or synthetic origin. The simplest gelled systems are made by adding a gelling agent (such us Laponite® RD, xanthan gum or agar-agar) to the cleaning agent.</div><div>The aim of this research is to evaluate, using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR), the efficacy of hydrogels prepared from three commercial natural mucilages: guar, locust bean and konjac, in removing <em>gacha</em> from the reverse side of a canvas, and following the nowadays tendence that try to use eco-sustainable and bio-renewable cleaning materials. <em>Gacha</em> is an adhesive, made commonly with flour and animal glue as the main ingredients, used to line canvas paintings. The gels prepared were characterised by means of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), viscosity and aqueous phase release capacity. For this study, a mock-up of the canvas and the adhesive was prepared. Two application methods for the gels were tested: direct application and indirect using a physical barrier, with contact times of 15 and 30 min. The suitability of the mucilages in the elimination of the natural adhesive has been related to the decrease of the content of <em>gacha</em> on one side, and to the absence of gel residues after the cleaning process on the other, both parameters evaluated with ATR-FTIR analysis complemented with microscopic observations. The obtained results indicated that the removal of <em>gacha</em> was more effective with direct application, regardless of the mucilage used. On the other hand, mucilage residues are, in general, not significant, although in the case of direct application of guar and konjac for 15 min and locust bean and konjac for 30 min, the presence of mucilages traces were detected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage","volume":"71 ","pages":"Pages 153-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of mucilages efficacy in the removal of a natural adhesive (gacha) from a canvas by ATR – FTIR. First results\",\"authors\":\"Marina Palma Prieto ,&nbsp;Marta Pérez-Estébanez ,&nbsp;Sonia Santos Gómez ,&nbsp;José Manuel de la Roja ,&nbsp;Carmen Ahedo Pino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.culher.2024.11.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nowadays the use of gelled systems to remove natural glues from cultural artefacts is very common, as they allow the application of controlled humidity to sensitive surfaces. These cleaning systems can be of natural or synthetic origin. The simplest gelled systems are made by adding a gelling agent (such us Laponite® RD, xanthan gum or agar-agar) to the cleaning agent.</div><div>The aim of this research is to evaluate, using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR), the efficacy of hydrogels prepared from three commercial natural mucilages: guar, locust bean and konjac, in removing <em>gacha</em> from the reverse side of a canvas, and following the nowadays tendence that try to use eco-sustainable and bio-renewable cleaning materials. <em>Gacha</em> is an adhesive, made commonly with flour and animal glue as the main ingredients, used to line canvas paintings. The gels prepared were characterised by means of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), viscosity and aqueous phase release capacity. For this study, a mock-up of the canvas and the adhesive was prepared. Two application methods for the gels were tested: direct application and indirect using a physical barrier, with contact times of 15 and 30 min. The suitability of the mucilages in the elimination of the natural adhesive has been related to the decrease of the content of <em>gacha</em> on one side, and to the absence of gel residues after the cleaning process on the other, both parameters evaluated with ATR-FTIR analysis complemented with microscopic observations. The obtained results indicated that the removal of <em>gacha</em> was more effective with direct application, regardless of the mucilage used. On the other hand, mucilage residues are, in general, not significant, although in the case of direct application of guar and konjac for 15 min and locust bean and konjac for 30 min, the presence of mucilages traces were detected.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 153-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424002462\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424002462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,使用凝胶系统从文物中去除天然胶水是非常常见的,因为它们允许在敏感表面上应用控制湿度。这些清洗系统可以是天然的或合成的。最简单的凝胶系统是通过在清洗剂中添加胶凝剂(如Laponite®RD,黄原胶或琼脂)制成的。本研究的目的是利用衰减全反射-傅里叶变换红外(ATR-FTIR)来评估由三种商业天然黏液(瓜尔胶、刺槐豆和魔芋)制备的水凝胶去除帆布背面gacha的功效,并遵循当今尝试使用生态可持续和生物可再生清洁材料的趋势。Gacha是一种粘合剂,通常以面粉和动物胶为主要成分制成,用于画布绘画。通过pH值、电导率、粘度和水相释放能力对制备的凝胶进行了表征。在这项研究中,准备了帆布和粘合剂的模型。测试了凝胶的两种应用方法:直接应用和间接使用物理屏障,接触时间分别为15和30分钟。胶浆在消除天然粘合剂方面的适用性与一方面gacha含量的减少有关,另一方面在清洁过程中没有凝胶残留物,这两个参数都通过ATR-FTIR分析和显微镜观察相结合来评估。所得结果表明,无论使用何种黏液,直接施用都能更有效地去除gacha。另一方面,尽管在直接施用瓜尔胶和魔芋15分钟,刺槐豆和魔芋30分钟的情况下,检测到黏液残留,但通常情况下,黏液残留不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of mucilages efficacy in the removal of a natural adhesive (gacha) from a canvas by ATR – FTIR. First results
Nowadays the use of gelled systems to remove natural glues from cultural artefacts is very common, as they allow the application of controlled humidity to sensitive surfaces. These cleaning systems can be of natural or synthetic origin. The simplest gelled systems are made by adding a gelling agent (such us Laponite® RD, xanthan gum or agar-agar) to the cleaning agent.
The aim of this research is to evaluate, using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR), the efficacy of hydrogels prepared from three commercial natural mucilages: guar, locust bean and konjac, in removing gacha from the reverse side of a canvas, and following the nowadays tendence that try to use eco-sustainable and bio-renewable cleaning materials. Gacha is an adhesive, made commonly with flour and animal glue as the main ingredients, used to line canvas paintings. The gels prepared were characterised by means of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), viscosity and aqueous phase release capacity. For this study, a mock-up of the canvas and the adhesive was prepared. Two application methods for the gels were tested: direct application and indirect using a physical barrier, with contact times of 15 and 30 min. The suitability of the mucilages in the elimination of the natural adhesive has been related to the decrease of the content of gacha on one side, and to the absence of gel residues after the cleaning process on the other, both parameters evaluated with ATR-FTIR analysis complemented with microscopic observations. The obtained results indicated that the removal of gacha was more effective with direct application, regardless of the mucilage used. On the other hand, mucilage residues are, in general, not significant, although in the case of direct application of guar and konjac for 15 min and locust bean and konjac for 30 min, the presence of mucilages traces were detected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cultural Heritage
Journal of Cultural Heritage 综合性期刊-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
166
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cultural Heritage publishes original papers which comprise previously unpublished data and present innovative methods concerning all aspects of science and technology of cultural heritage as well as interpretation and theoretical issues related to preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信