以过程为基础的治疗效果检验:一项多基线研究

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Clarissa W. Ong , Kate Sheehan , Adam J.D. Mann , Estella Fox
{"title":"以过程为基础的治疗效果检验:一项多基线研究","authors":"Clarissa W. Ong ,&nbsp;Kate Sheehan ,&nbsp;Adam J.D. Mann ,&nbsp;Estella Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Process-based therapy (PBT) is a model of psychological assessment and treatment focused on processes of change within particular people in their unique context. Many theoretical articles have been published on PBT, but few empirical studies explicitly examining PBT exist. The current study aimed to examine the effects of PBT using a multiple baseline design (<em>N</em> = 5) with intensive longitudinal assessment from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Overall, idiographic outcomes improved over time, with effects varying by participant. Gains appeared to be maintained at 6-month follow-up for two of three participants. In addition, individual-level networks contained fewer pathways overall or more inhibitory pathways over time, indicating that the relationships among symptoms changed over the course of treatment. At the same time, extent of change in standardized outcomes across participants varied and certain pathways in participant networks were consistent at multiple timepoints, suggesting that treatment was not universally effective across problem indices. The present study provides a proof of concept for PBT delivery and underscores the need to consider person-level outcomes when evaluating treatment efficacy. Future directions and limitations, including small sample size, are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the effects of process-based therapy: A multiple baseline study\",\"authors\":\"Clarissa W. Ong ,&nbsp;Kate Sheehan ,&nbsp;Adam J.D. Mann ,&nbsp;Estella Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Process-based therapy (PBT) is a model of psychological assessment and treatment focused on processes of change within particular people in their unique context. Many theoretical articles have been published on PBT, but few empirical studies explicitly examining PBT exist. The current study aimed to examine the effects of PBT using a multiple baseline design (<em>N</em> = 5) with intensive longitudinal assessment from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Overall, idiographic outcomes improved over time, with effects varying by participant. Gains appeared to be maintained at 6-month follow-up for two of three participants. In addition, individual-level networks contained fewer pathways overall or more inhibitory pathways over time, indicating that the relationships among symptoms changed over the course of treatment. At the same time, extent of change in standardized outcomes across participants varied and certain pathways in participant networks were consistent at multiple timepoints, suggesting that treatment was not universally effective across problem indices. The present study provides a proof of concept for PBT delivery and underscores the need to consider person-level outcomes when evaluating treatment efficacy. Future directions and limitations, including small sample size, are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于过程的治疗(PBT)是一种心理评估和治疗模式,专注于特定人群在其独特环境中的变化过程。关于PBT的理论文章很多,但明确考察PBT的实证研究很少。目前的研究旨在通过多基线设计(N = 5),从基线到6个月随访期间进行深入的纵向评估,来检查PBT的效果。总体而言,个别结果随着时间的推移而改善,其效果因参与者而异。在6个月的随访中,三名参与者中的两名似乎保持了收益。此外,随着时间的推移,个人层面的网络总体上包含更少的途径或更多的抑制途径,这表明症状之间的关系在治疗过程中发生了变化。同时,参与者标准化结果的变化程度各不相同,参与者网络中的某些途径在多个时间点上是一致的,这表明治疗并非在问题指数中普遍有效。目前的研究为PBT的概念提供了证明,并强调在评估治疗效果时需要考虑个人水平的结果。讨论了未来的发展方向和局限性,包括小样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the effects of process-based therapy: A multiple baseline study
Process-based therapy (PBT) is a model of psychological assessment and treatment focused on processes of change within particular people in their unique context. Many theoretical articles have been published on PBT, but few empirical studies explicitly examining PBT exist. The current study aimed to examine the effects of PBT using a multiple baseline design (N = 5) with intensive longitudinal assessment from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Overall, idiographic outcomes improved over time, with effects varying by participant. Gains appeared to be maintained at 6-month follow-up for two of three participants. In addition, individual-level networks contained fewer pathways overall or more inhibitory pathways over time, indicating that the relationships among symptoms changed over the course of treatment. At the same time, extent of change in standardized outcomes across participants varied and certain pathways in participant networks were consistent at multiple timepoints, suggesting that treatment was not universally effective across problem indices. The present study provides a proof of concept for PBT delivery and underscores the need to consider person-level outcomes when evaluating treatment efficacy. Future directions and limitations, including small sample size, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信