堕胎与幸福:叙事文献综述

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ernestina Coast , Rishita Nandagiri , Andra Fry , Midanna de Almada , Heidi Johnston , Hazal Atay , Bela Ganatra , Antonella Lavelanet , Nurudeen Alhassan , Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas , Lucía Berro Pizzarossa
{"title":"堕胎与幸福:叙事文献综述","authors":"Ernestina Coast ,&nbsp;Rishita Nandagiri ,&nbsp;Andra Fry ,&nbsp;Midanna de Almada ,&nbsp;Heidi Johnston ,&nbsp;Hazal Atay ,&nbsp;Bela Ganatra ,&nbsp;Antonella Lavelanet ,&nbsp;Nurudeen Alhassan ,&nbsp;Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ,&nbsp;Lucía Berro Pizzarossa","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>“Well-being” is utilised in multiple ways – an everyday word, a component of health, a policy objective, reflecting a diverse set of shifting meanings, conceptualisations, definitions, measurements, and theorising. Influenced by structural and social conditions, well-being can be enhanced or diminished and is experienced at a range of scales (individual, community, society). Globally, abortion is a common practice with implications for well-being. However, the intersections and linkages between abortion and well-being have not yet been explicitly synthesised. To extend understandings, theorising, and measurements, we conducted a systematically searched narrative literature review of evidence pertaining to abortion and well-being.</div><div>We used a grounded theory-driven approach to theoretically sample items until concept (abortion and well-being) saturation was reached, meaning our study was guided by the literature, rather than imposing an external set of theories. Our database searches (January 01, 2005–June 19, 2023) identified 7665 unique records yielding 753 records for the review, from which n = 167 items were selected for extraction.</div><div>Our analysis of extracted items yielded four main themes. First, only a minority (13/167) of studies explicitly engaged with well-being. Second, the majority of studies incorporated well-being-allied concepts, without explicitly framing their research as about well-being. We developed insights from these studies using four sub-themes: social connectedness, individual agency, mental health, and physical health. Third, there is limited use of theory and/or frameworks in the empirical evidence. Last, we interrogated the empirical research on abortion and well-being over the life course.</div><div>Well-being and allied concepts can be useful and productive analytic framings with relevance for research on abortion. We invite readers to consider how these concepts might be used to develop and iterate innovation – methodologically, empirically, and theoretically – to clarify, extend and deepen links between abortion and well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion and well-being: A narrative literature review\",\"authors\":\"Ernestina Coast ,&nbsp;Rishita Nandagiri ,&nbsp;Andra Fry ,&nbsp;Midanna de Almada ,&nbsp;Heidi Johnston ,&nbsp;Hazal Atay ,&nbsp;Bela Ganatra ,&nbsp;Antonella Lavelanet ,&nbsp;Nurudeen Alhassan ,&nbsp;Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ,&nbsp;Lucía Berro Pizzarossa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>“Well-being” is utilised in multiple ways – an everyday word, a component of health, a policy objective, reflecting a diverse set of shifting meanings, conceptualisations, definitions, measurements, and theorising. Influenced by structural and social conditions, well-being can be enhanced or diminished and is experienced at a range of scales (individual, community, society). Globally, abortion is a common practice with implications for well-being. However, the intersections and linkages between abortion and well-being have not yet been explicitly synthesised. To extend understandings, theorising, and measurements, we conducted a systematically searched narrative literature review of evidence pertaining to abortion and well-being.</div><div>We used a grounded theory-driven approach to theoretically sample items until concept (abortion and well-being) saturation was reached, meaning our study was guided by the literature, rather than imposing an external set of theories. Our database searches (January 01, 2005–June 19, 2023) identified 7665 unique records yielding 753 records for the review, from which n = 167 items were selected for extraction.</div><div>Our analysis of extracted items yielded four main themes. First, only a minority (13/167) of studies explicitly engaged with well-being. Second, the majority of studies incorporated well-being-allied concepts, without explicitly framing their research as about well-being. We developed insights from these studies using four sub-themes: social connectedness, individual agency, mental health, and physical health. Third, there is limited use of theory and/or frameworks in the empirical evidence. Last, we interrogated the empirical research on abortion and well-being over the life course.</div><div>Well-being and allied concepts can be useful and productive analytic framings with relevance for research on abortion. We invite readers to consider how these concepts might be used to develop and iterate innovation – methodologically, empirically, and theoretically – to clarify, extend and deepen links between abortion and well-being.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“福祉”的使用方式多种多样——一个日常用语、健康的一个组成部分、一个政策目标,反映了一系列不断变化的含义、概念化、定义、衡量和理论化。受结构和社会条件的影响,福祉可以增强或减弱,并在一系列尺度(个人、社区、社会)上得到体验。在全球范围内,堕胎是一种影响健康的普遍做法。然而,堕胎和幸福之间的交叉点和联系尚未得到明确的综合。为了扩大理解、理论化和测量,我们系统地检索了有关堕胎和幸福的证据的叙述文献综述。我们使用了一种基于理论的方法来理论上采样项目,直到概念(堕胎和幸福)达到饱和,这意味着我们的研究是由文献指导的,而不是强加一套外部理论。我们的数据库搜索(2005年1月1日- 2023年6月19日)确定了7665条唯一记录,产生了753条记录用于审查,从中选择了n = 167项进行提取。我们对提取物品的分析得出了四个主要主题。首先,只有少数(13/167)的研究明确涉及幸福感。其次,大多数研究纳入了与幸福相关的概念,没有明确地将他们的研究框定为关于幸福的研究。我们从这些研究中得出了四个子主题:社会联系、个人代理、心理健康和身体健康。第三,在经验证据中,理论和/或框架的使用有限。最后,我们对堕胎与生命过程中幸福感的实证研究进行了质疑。福祉和相关概念可以是有用和富有成效的分析框架,与堕胎研究相关。我们邀请读者考虑如何使用这些概念来发展和迭代创新——方法上、经验上和理论上——以澄清、扩展和深化堕胎与福祉之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abortion and well-being: A narrative literature review
“Well-being” is utilised in multiple ways – an everyday word, a component of health, a policy objective, reflecting a diverse set of shifting meanings, conceptualisations, definitions, measurements, and theorising. Influenced by structural and social conditions, well-being can be enhanced or diminished and is experienced at a range of scales (individual, community, society). Globally, abortion is a common practice with implications for well-being. However, the intersections and linkages between abortion and well-being have not yet been explicitly synthesised. To extend understandings, theorising, and measurements, we conducted a systematically searched narrative literature review of evidence pertaining to abortion and well-being.
We used a grounded theory-driven approach to theoretically sample items until concept (abortion and well-being) saturation was reached, meaning our study was guided by the literature, rather than imposing an external set of theories. Our database searches (January 01, 2005–June 19, 2023) identified 7665 unique records yielding 753 records for the review, from which n = 167 items were selected for extraction.
Our analysis of extracted items yielded four main themes. First, only a minority (13/167) of studies explicitly engaged with well-being. Second, the majority of studies incorporated well-being-allied concepts, without explicitly framing their research as about well-being. We developed insights from these studies using four sub-themes: social connectedness, individual agency, mental health, and physical health. Third, there is limited use of theory and/or frameworks in the empirical evidence. Last, we interrogated the empirical research on abortion and well-being over the life course.
Well-being and allied concepts can be useful and productive analytic framings with relevance for research on abortion. We invite readers to consider how these concepts might be used to develop and iterate innovation – methodologically, empirically, and theoretically – to clarify, extend and deepen links between abortion and well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信