多布斯后避孕护理:临床工作人员视角的定性研究

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alicia VandeVusse, Jennifer Mueller, Octavia Mulhern, Sidney Cech
{"title":"多布斯后避孕护理:临床工作人员视角的定性研究","authors":"Alicia VandeVusse,&nbsp;Jennifer Mueller,&nbsp;Octavia Mulhern,&nbsp;Sidney Cech","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Access to contraception is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. Abortion restrictions such as those introduced in some states following the Supreme Court's <em>Dobbs</em> decision have spillover effects on broader sexual and reproductive health service provision, such as contraceptive services. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with key staff at publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in the United States, examining their experiences of changes in the delivery of family planning services in states where abortion policies are severely restrictive and states where they are less restrictive or protective. We found that publicly supported family planning clinics have experienced some limited impacts on contraceptive care and contraceptive demand due to the <em>Dobbs</em> decision and resultant abortion bans. Clinics in both restrictive and less restrictive/protective states report continuing to provide high-quality contraceptive care post-<em>Dobbs</em>, but they have also changed certain contraceptive counseling practices, grappled with changes in contraceptive demand, and taken steps to adjust their clinic workflows to mitigate the effects of <em>Dobbs</em>. Abortion restrictions impact the provision of contraceptive services. More research is needed to continue to document the spillover effects of abortion restrictions, along with the impact of restrictions on the quality of contraceptive care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100532"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Alicia VandeVusse,&nbsp;Jennifer Mueller,&nbsp;Octavia Mulhern,&nbsp;Sidney Cech\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Access to contraception is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. Abortion restrictions such as those introduced in some states following the Supreme Court's <em>Dobbs</em> decision have spillover effects on broader sexual and reproductive health service provision, such as contraceptive services. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with key staff at publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in the United States, examining their experiences of changes in the delivery of family planning services in states where abortion policies are severely restrictive and states where they are less restrictive or protective. We found that publicly supported family planning clinics have experienced some limited impacts on contraceptive care and contraceptive demand due to the <em>Dobbs</em> decision and resultant abortion bans. Clinics in both restrictive and less restrictive/protective states report continuing to provide high-quality contraceptive care post-<em>Dobbs</em>, but they have also changed certain contraceptive counseling practices, grappled with changes in contraceptive demand, and taken steps to adjust their clinic workflows to mitigate the effects of <em>Dobbs</em>. Abortion restrictions impact the provision of contraceptive services. More research is needed to continue to document the spillover effects of abortion restrictions, along with the impact of restrictions on the quality of contraceptive care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

获得避孕药具是生殖自主的重要组成部分。一些州在最高法院对多布斯案作出裁决后实行的堕胎限制,对更广泛的性健康和生殖健康服务(如避孕服务)的提供产生了溢出效应。我们对美国提供避孕服务的公共支持诊所的主要工作人员进行了36次深度访谈,考察了他们在堕胎政策严格限制和限制较少或保护较少的州提供计划生育服务的变化经验。我们发现公共支持的计划生育诊所在避孕护理和避孕需求方面受到了一些有限的影响,这是由于Dobbs判决和由此产生的堕胎禁令。据报告,在多布斯事件发生后,限制和较少限制/保护的州的诊所继续提供高质量的避孕护理,但他们也改变了某些避孕咨询做法,努力应对避孕需求的变化,并采取措施调整诊所工作流程,以减轻多布斯事件的影响。堕胎限制影响避孕服务的提供。需要进行更多的研究,以继续记录堕胎限制的溢出效应,以及限制对避孕护理质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
Access to contraception is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. Abortion restrictions such as those introduced in some states following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision have spillover effects on broader sexual and reproductive health service provision, such as contraceptive services. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with key staff at publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in the United States, examining their experiences of changes in the delivery of family planning services in states where abortion policies are severely restrictive and states where they are less restrictive or protective. We found that publicly supported family planning clinics have experienced some limited impacts on contraceptive care and contraceptive demand due to the Dobbs decision and resultant abortion bans. Clinics in both restrictive and less restrictive/protective states report continuing to provide high-quality contraceptive care post-Dobbs, but they have also changed certain contraceptive counseling practices, grappled with changes in contraceptive demand, and taken steps to adjust their clinic workflows to mitigate the effects of Dobbs. Abortion restrictions impact the provision of contraceptive services. More research is needed to continue to document the spillover effects of abortion restrictions, along with the impact of restrictions on the quality of contraceptive care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信