IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kim Sune Karrasch Jepsen, Inge Kryger Pedersen
{"title":"Impaired face-to-face interaction and emotional energy in cochlear implant usage: Strategies for social inclusion in everyday life among young people with hearing loss","authors":"Kim Sune Karrasch Jepsen,&nbsp;Inge Kryger Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cochlear implantation is a standardized medical treatment for children and adolescents with severe to profound hearing loss. Medico-clinical research reports good communicative outcomes, especially for those individuals implanted early and who receive aural-verbal habilitation. However, as revealed by studies of other groups with hearing loss, research into pragmatic skills finds variable conversational problems, and quantitative psychosocial studies report more difficulties compared with hearing control groups. These findings pose questions about how everyday social interaction and participation in key settings of socialization occur outside test settings. Developing micro-sociological explanations from Erving Goffman's work and theories of ritual interaction, this article presents a framework that explains problematic findings as resulting from micro-interactional barriers in face-to-face situations. Informal group situations and noise make participants fall out of sync in their interactions, which facilitates micro-social exclusion and defensive strategies. This explanation is qualified in the context of Denmark with an interview-based analysis of how young adults implanted as children have experienced micro-barriers across school trajectories and informal group participations. Furthermore, their experiences suggest that domains of matchup, including multi-modal communication, can be decisive for supporting social participation of children and adolescents with hearing loss in mainstream society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工耳蜗植入术是儿童和青少年重度至重度听力损失的一种标准化医疗方法。医学临床研究报告了良好的交流结果,特别是对于那些早期植入和接受听觉语言训练的个体。然而,正如对其他听力损失群体的研究所揭示的那样,对语用技能的研究发现了各种各样的会话问题,定量的社会心理研究报告了与听力对照组相比更多的困难。这些发现提出了一个问题,即日常的社会互动和参与社会化的关键环境是如何在测试环境之外发生的。本文从欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)的工作和仪式互动理论中发展出微观社会学解释,提出了一个框架来解释面对面情境中微观互动障碍所导致的问题。非正式的群体环境和噪音使参与者在互动中不同步,这促进了微观社会排斥和防御策略。在丹麦的背景下,这种解释是有资格的,基于访谈的分析是关于年轻人如何在儿童时期被植入学校轨迹和非正式群体参与中经历微障碍的。此外,他们的经验表明,包括多模式沟通在内的匹配领域对于支持听力损失儿童和青少年在主流社会中的社会参与具有决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impaired face-to-face interaction and emotional energy in cochlear implant usage: Strategies for social inclusion in everyday life among young people with hearing loss
Cochlear implantation is a standardized medical treatment for children and adolescents with severe to profound hearing loss. Medico-clinical research reports good communicative outcomes, especially for those individuals implanted early and who receive aural-verbal habilitation. However, as revealed by studies of other groups with hearing loss, research into pragmatic skills finds variable conversational problems, and quantitative psychosocial studies report more difficulties compared with hearing control groups. These findings pose questions about how everyday social interaction and participation in key settings of socialization occur outside test settings. Developing micro-sociological explanations from Erving Goffman's work and theories of ritual interaction, this article presents a framework that explains problematic findings as resulting from micro-interactional barriers in face-to-face situations. Informal group situations and noise make participants fall out of sync in their interactions, which facilitates micro-social exclusion and defensive strategies. This explanation is qualified in the context of Denmark with an interview-based analysis of how young adults implanted as children have experienced micro-barriers across school trajectories and informal group participations. Furthermore, their experiences suggest that domains of matchup, including multi-modal communication, can be decisive for supporting social participation of children and adolescents with hearing loss in mainstream society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信