熊彼特经济中的最优专利政策与财富不平等

IF 1.3 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Angus C. Chu , Chih-Hsing Liao
{"title":"熊彼特经济中的最优专利政策与财富不平等","authors":"Angus C. Chu ,&nbsp;Chih-Hsing Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.jmacro.2024.103656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Does wealth inequality affect optimal patent policy? This study develops a Schumpeterian growth model with heterogeneous households to explore this question. Our model features a general innovation specification that nests two common specifications: (a) the <em>knowledge-driven</em> specification that uses R&amp;D labor, and (b) the <em>lab-equipment</em> specification that uses final output for R&amp;D. Under the knowledge-driven specification, all households prefer the same level of patent protection. However, under the lab-equipment specification, less wealthy households prefer weaker patent protection, so an unequal distribution of wealth reduces optimal patent protection and economic growth. Under the general innovation specification, strengthening patent protection has an inverted-U effect on innovation, in contrast to the positive effect under the two special cases. More importantly, an unequal wealth distribution continues to reduce optimal patent protection. Calibrating the model to US data, we find that eliminating wealth inequality raises economic growth by about 0.5% via stronger patent protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Macroeconomics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal patent policy and wealth inequality in a Schumpeterian economy\",\"authors\":\"Angus C. Chu ,&nbsp;Chih-Hsing Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmacro.2024.103656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Does wealth inequality affect optimal patent policy? This study develops a Schumpeterian growth model with heterogeneous households to explore this question. Our model features a general innovation specification that nests two common specifications: (a) the <em>knowledge-driven</em> specification that uses R&amp;D labor, and (b) the <em>lab-equipment</em> specification that uses final output for R&amp;D. Under the knowledge-driven specification, all households prefer the same level of patent protection. However, under the lab-equipment specification, less wealthy households prefer weaker patent protection, so an unequal distribution of wealth reduces optimal patent protection and economic growth. Under the general innovation specification, strengthening patent protection has an inverted-U effect on innovation, in contrast to the positive effect under the two special cases. More importantly, an unequal wealth distribution continues to reduce optimal patent protection. Calibrating the model to US data, we find that eliminating wealth inequality raises economic growth by about 0.5% via stronger patent protection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Macroeconomics\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Macroeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164070424000703\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164070424000703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财富不平等是否影响最优专利政策?本文运用熊彼特的异质性家庭成长模型来探讨这一问题。我们的模型以一个通用的创新规范为特征,其中包含两个常见的规范:(a)使用研发劳动力的知识驱动规范,以及(b)使用研发最终输出的实验室设备规范。在知识驱动规范下,所有家庭都倾向于相同水平的专利保护。然而,在实验室设备规范下,较不富裕的家庭倾向于较弱的专利保护,因此财富分配的不平等降低了最优专利保护和经济增长。在一般创新规范下,加强专利保护对创新具有倒u型效应,而在两种特殊情况下则具有正效应。更重要的是,不平等的财富分配继续降低最佳专利保护。将该模型与美国数据进行校准后,我们发现,通过加强专利保护,消除财富不平等可以使经济增长提高约0.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal patent policy and wealth inequality in a Schumpeterian economy
Does wealth inequality affect optimal patent policy? This study develops a Schumpeterian growth model with heterogeneous households to explore this question. Our model features a general innovation specification that nests two common specifications: (a) the knowledge-driven specification that uses R&D labor, and (b) the lab-equipment specification that uses final output for R&D. Under the knowledge-driven specification, all households prefer the same level of patent protection. However, under the lab-equipment specification, less wealthy households prefer weaker patent protection, so an unequal distribution of wealth reduces optimal patent protection and economic growth. Under the general innovation specification, strengthening patent protection has an inverted-U effect on innovation, in contrast to the positive effect under the two special cases. More importantly, an unequal wealth distribution continues to reduce optimal patent protection. Calibrating the model to US data, we find that eliminating wealth inequality raises economic growth by about 0.5% via stronger patent protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1979, the Journal of Macroeconomics has published theoretical and empirical articles that span the entire range of macroeconomics and monetary economics. More specifically, the editors encourage the submission of high quality papers that are concerned with the theoretical or empirical aspects of the following broadly defined topics: economic growth, economic fluctuations, the effects of monetary and fiscal policy, the political aspects of macroeconomics, exchange rate determination and other elements of open economy macroeconomics, the macroeconomics of income inequality, and macroeconomic forecasting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信