利用ChatGPT制作常见手部疾病的患者教育材料

Q3 Medicine
George Abdelmalek MD , Harjot Uppal MBA , Daniel Garcia BS , Joseph Farshchian MD , Arash Emami MD , Andrew McGinniss MD
{"title":"利用ChatGPT制作常见手部疾病的患者教育材料","authors":"George Abdelmalek MD ,&nbsp;Harjot Uppal MBA ,&nbsp;Daniel Garcia BS ,&nbsp;Joseph Farshchian MD ,&nbsp;Arash Emami MD ,&nbsp;Andrew McGinniss MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Many adults in the United States possess basic or below basic health literacy skills, making it essential for patient education materials (PEMs) to be presented at or below a sixth-grade reading level. We evaluate the readability of PEMs generated by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 for common hand conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 and 4.0 to generate PEMs for 50 common hand pathologies. Two consistent questions were asked to minimize variability: 1. “Please explain [Condition] to a patient at a sixth-grade reading level, including details on anatomy, symptoms, doctors' examination, and treatment (both surgical and nonsurgical).” 2. “Create a detailed patient information sheet for the general patient population at a sixth-grade reading level explaining [Condition], including points such as anatomy, symptoms, physical examination, and treatment (both surgical and nonsurgical).” Before asking the second question, a priming phase was conducted where ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 were presented with a text sample written at a sixth-grade reading level and informed that this was the desired output level. Multiple readability tests were used to evaluate the output, with a consensus reading level created from the results of all eight readability scores. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT 4.0 successfully produced 28% of its responses at the appropriate reading level following the priming phase, compared to none by ChatGPT 3.5. ChatGPT 4.0 showed superior performance across all readability metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ChatGPT 4.0 is a more effective tool than ChatGPT 3.5 for generating PEMs at a sixth-grade reading level for common hand conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The results suggest that Artificial Intelligence could significantly enhance patient education and health literacy with further refinement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging ChatGPT to Produce Patient Education Materials for Common Hand Conditions\",\"authors\":\"George Abdelmalek MD ,&nbsp;Harjot Uppal MBA ,&nbsp;Daniel Garcia BS ,&nbsp;Joseph Farshchian MD ,&nbsp;Arash Emami MD ,&nbsp;Andrew McGinniss MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Many adults in the United States possess basic or below basic health literacy skills, making it essential for patient education materials (PEMs) to be presented at or below a sixth-grade reading level. We evaluate the readability of PEMs generated by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 for common hand conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 and 4.0 to generate PEMs for 50 common hand pathologies. Two consistent questions were asked to minimize variability: 1. “Please explain [Condition] to a patient at a sixth-grade reading level, including details on anatomy, symptoms, doctors' examination, and treatment (both surgical and nonsurgical).” 2. “Create a detailed patient information sheet for the general patient population at a sixth-grade reading level explaining [Condition], including points such as anatomy, symptoms, physical examination, and treatment (both surgical and nonsurgical).” Before asking the second question, a priming phase was conducted where ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 were presented with a text sample written at a sixth-grade reading level and informed that this was the desired output level. Multiple readability tests were used to evaluate the output, with a consensus reading level created from the results of all eight readability scores. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT 4.0 successfully produced 28% of its responses at the appropriate reading level following the priming phase, compared to none by ChatGPT 3.5. ChatGPT 4.0 showed superior performance across all readability metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ChatGPT 4.0 is a more effective tool than ChatGPT 3.5 for generating PEMs at a sixth-grade reading level for common hand conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The results suggest that Artificial Intelligence could significantly enhance patient education and health literacy with further refinement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 37-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,许多成年人拥有基本或低于基本的健康素养技能,因此患者教育材料(PEMs)必须达到或低于六年级的阅读水平。我们评估了ChatGPT 3.5和4.0生成的PEMs在常见手部条件下的可读性。方法采用聊天生成预训练变压器(ChatGPT) 3.5和4.0对50种常见手部病变生成PEMs。两个一致的问题被问到最小化可变性:1。“请以六年级阅读水平向病人解释[病情],包括解剖、症状、医生检查和治疗(手术和非手术)的细节。”“2。“为普通患者群体制作一份详细的患者信息表,以六年级阅读水平解释[病情],包括解剖、症状、体检和治疗(手术和非手术)等要点。”在提出第二个问题之前,进行了启动阶段,其中向ChatGPT 3.5和4.0展示了以六年级阅读水平编写的文本样本,并告知这是期望的输出水平。使用多个可读性测试来评估输出,并根据所有八个可读性分数的结果创建一致的阅读水平。采用SAS 9.4进行统计学分析。结果在启动阶段后,ChatGPT 4.0在适当的阅读水平下成功产生了28%的反应,而ChatGPT 3.5则没有。ChatGPT 4.0在所有可读性指标上都表现出卓越的性能。结论ChatGPT 4.0比ChatGPT 3.5更有效地生成六年级阅读水平的PEMs。结果表明,人工智能可以显著提高患者教育水平和健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging ChatGPT to Produce Patient Education Materials for Common Hand Conditions

Purpose

Many adults in the United States possess basic or below basic health literacy skills, making it essential for patient education materials (PEMs) to be presented at or below a sixth-grade reading level. We evaluate the readability of PEMs generated by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 for common hand conditions.

Methods

We used Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 and 4.0 to generate PEMs for 50 common hand pathologies. Two consistent questions were asked to minimize variability: 1. “Please explain [Condition] to a patient at a sixth-grade reading level, including details on anatomy, symptoms, doctors' examination, and treatment (both surgical and nonsurgical).” 2. “Create a detailed patient information sheet for the general patient population at a sixth-grade reading level explaining [Condition], including points such as anatomy, symptoms, physical examination, and treatment (both surgical and nonsurgical).” Before asking the second question, a priming phase was conducted where ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 were presented with a text sample written at a sixth-grade reading level and informed that this was the desired output level. Multiple readability tests were used to evaluate the output, with a consensus reading level created from the results of all eight readability scores. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.

Results

ChatGPT 4.0 successfully produced 28% of its responses at the appropriate reading level following the priming phase, compared to none by ChatGPT 3.5. ChatGPT 4.0 showed superior performance across all readability metrics.

Conclusions

ChatGPT 4.0 is a more effective tool than ChatGPT 3.5 for generating PEMs at a sixth-grade reading level for common hand conditions.

Clinical relevance

The results suggest that Artificial Intelligence could significantly enhance patient education and health literacy with further refinement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信