Anas Elgenidy , Omar Alomari , Tasbih Emad , Sara K. Kamal , Islam E. Al Ghanam , Aya Sherif , Mohammed Al-mahdi Al-kurdi , Abdallah A. Helal , Yusof Mohamed Omar , Mohamed Rafiek Ramadan
{"title":"系统性免疫-炎症指数:通过全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析揭示溃疡性结肠炎的诊断潜力","authors":"Anas Elgenidy , Omar Alomari , Tasbih Emad , Sara K. Kamal , Islam E. Al Ghanam , Aya Sherif , Mohammed Al-mahdi Al-kurdi , Abdallah A. Helal , Yusof Mohamed Omar , Mohamed Rafiek Ramadan","doi":"10.1016/j.gande.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with unpredictable colon and rectum inflammation episodes. Evaluating disease activity is essential for effective management. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a potential biomarker for assessing inflammation and disease severity in UC. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively assess the utility of SII in UC by analyzing its association with disease activity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases have been searched for relevant studies OpenMetaAnalyst software were utilized in the analysis. Furthermore, we conducted a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis using Meta-Disc version 2.0 software, employing a univariate model to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of SII.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included seven retrospective studies comprising 1127 UC patients and 686 healthy controls. Our analysis revealed a significantly higher SII in UC patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference: −620.00, 95 % CI -1337.08 – 97.07), indicating its potential as a diagnostic marker. SII was also significantly lower in UC patients in remission compared to those with active disease (mean difference: −521.71, 95 % CI -962.92 to −80.50), suggesting its role in monitoring disease activity. The DTA analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.622 and specificity of 0.805 for SII in predicting UC activity, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.773.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our meta-analysis reveals that the SII holds significant promise as a non-invasive marker for assessing the activity and severity of UC. The findings demonstrate that SII is significantly lower in healthy controls compared to UC patients and lower in patients in remission compared to those with active disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100571,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 22-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic immune-inflammation index: Unveiling the diagnostic potential in ulcerative colitis through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anas Elgenidy , Omar Alomari , Tasbih Emad , Sara K. Kamal , Islam E. Al Ghanam , Aya Sherif , Mohammed Al-mahdi Al-kurdi , Abdallah A. Helal , Yusof Mohamed Omar , Mohamed Rafiek Ramadan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gande.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with unpredictable colon and rectum inflammation episodes. Evaluating disease activity is essential for effective management. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a potential biomarker for assessing inflammation and disease severity in UC. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively assess the utility of SII in UC by analyzing its association with disease activity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases have been searched for relevant studies OpenMetaAnalyst software were utilized in the analysis. Furthermore, we conducted a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis using Meta-Disc version 2.0 software, employing a univariate model to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of SII.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included seven retrospective studies comprising 1127 UC patients and 686 healthy controls. Our analysis revealed a significantly higher SII in UC patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference: −620.00, 95 % CI -1337.08 – 97.07), indicating its potential as a diagnostic marker. SII was also significantly lower in UC patients in remission compared to those with active disease (mean difference: −521.71, 95 % CI -962.92 to −80.50), suggesting its role in monitoring disease activity. The DTA analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.622 and specificity of 0.805 for SII in predicting UC activity, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.773.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our meta-analysis reveals that the SII holds significant promise as a non-invasive marker for assessing the activity and severity of UC. The findings demonstrate that SII is significantly lower in healthy controls compared to UC patients and lower in patients in remission compared to those with active disease.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 22-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752324000621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology & Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949752324000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景溃疡性结肠炎(UC)是一种慢性炎症性肠病,伴有不可预测的结肠和直肠炎症发作。评估疾病活动对有效管理至关重要。全身免疫炎症指数(SII)是评估UC炎症和疾病严重程度的潜在生物标志物。本荟萃分析旨在通过分析SII与疾病活动性的关系,全面评估其在UC中的应用。方法检索spubmed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science等数据库进行相关研究,采用OpenMetaAnalyst软件进行分析。此外,我们使用Meta-Disc 2.0版软件进行诊断测试准确性(DTA)分析,采用单变量模型评估SII的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。结果我们纳入了7项回顾性研究,包括1127名UC患者和686名健康对照。我们的分析显示UC患者的SII明显高于健康对照组(平均差异:- 620.00,95% CI -1337.08 - 97.07),表明其作为诊断标志物的潜力。UC缓解期患者的SII也显著低于活动性患者(平均差异:- 521.71,95% CI -962.92至- 80.50),提示其在监测疾病活动性方面的作用。DTA分析显示SII预测UC活动性的敏感性为0.622,特异性为0.805,诊断优势比为6.773。我们的荟萃分析显示,SII作为评估UC活动和严重程度的非侵入性标志物具有重要的前景。研究结果表明,与UC患者相比,健康对照组的SII明显较低,缓解期患者的SII较活动期患者低。
Systemic immune-inflammation index: Unveiling the diagnostic potential in ulcerative colitis through a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with unpredictable colon and rectum inflammation episodes. Evaluating disease activity is essential for effective management. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a potential biomarker for assessing inflammation and disease severity in UC. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively assess the utility of SII in UC by analyzing its association with disease activity.
Methods
PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases have been searched for relevant studies OpenMetaAnalyst software were utilized in the analysis. Furthermore, we conducted a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis using Meta-Disc version 2.0 software, employing a univariate model to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of SII.
Results
We included seven retrospective studies comprising 1127 UC patients and 686 healthy controls. Our analysis revealed a significantly higher SII in UC patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference: −620.00, 95 % CI -1337.08 – 97.07), indicating its potential as a diagnostic marker. SII was also significantly lower in UC patients in remission compared to those with active disease (mean difference: −521.71, 95 % CI -962.92 to −80.50), suggesting its role in monitoring disease activity. The DTA analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.622 and specificity of 0.805 for SII in predicting UC activity, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.773.
Conclusion
Our meta-analysis reveals that the SII holds significant promise as a non-invasive marker for assessing the activity and severity of UC. The findings demonstrate that SII is significantly lower in healthy controls compared to UC patients and lower in patients in remission compared to those with active disease.