{"title":"坚持还是改变技术轨迹?TMT关注与企业创新对技术强迫政策变化的反应","authors":"Qi He , Chang Wang , Chan Deng , Yifang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the critical role of technology-forcing policies in emerging technological innovation, little is known about firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes (TFPC). Drawing on the attention-based view and capability theory, this study explores the relationship between the attention of the top management team (TMT) toward TFPC and firms’ innovation responses by analyzing a sample of 108 firms in China’s power lithium-ion battery industry.<!--> <!-->Our findings indicate that TMT attention is essential for driving firms’ innovation responses, with two types of TMT attention—attention to TFPC incentives and attention to TFPC pressures—exerting distinct effects on both on-trajectory and off-trajectory innovations. Furthermore, the interaction between these two types of attention hinders a firms’ innovation decision making. Additionally, the different moderating roles of technical and relational capabilities were revealed. Overall,<!--> <!-->these findings contribute to the existing literature on technology-forcing policies and technological trajectory innovation, providing valuable insights into emerging technological innovation across various economies and industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115121"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insisting or shifting technological trajectory? TMT attention and firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes\",\"authors\":\"Qi He , Chang Wang , Chan Deng , Yifang Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the critical role of technology-forcing policies in emerging technological innovation, little is known about firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes (TFPC). Drawing on the attention-based view and capability theory, this study explores the relationship between the attention of the top management team (TMT) toward TFPC and firms’ innovation responses by analyzing a sample of 108 firms in China’s power lithium-ion battery industry.<!--> <!-->Our findings indicate that TMT attention is essential for driving firms’ innovation responses, with two types of TMT attention—attention to TFPC incentives and attention to TFPC pressures—exerting distinct effects on both on-trajectory and off-trajectory innovations. Furthermore, the interaction between these two types of attention hinders a firms’ innovation decision making. Additionally, the different moderating roles of technical and relational capabilities were revealed. Overall,<!--> <!-->these findings contribute to the existing literature on technology-forcing policies and technological trajectory innovation, providing valuable insights into emerging technological innovation across various economies and industries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006258\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insisting or shifting technological trajectory? TMT attention and firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes
Despite the critical role of technology-forcing policies in emerging technological innovation, little is known about firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes (TFPC). Drawing on the attention-based view and capability theory, this study explores the relationship between the attention of the top management team (TMT) toward TFPC and firms’ innovation responses by analyzing a sample of 108 firms in China’s power lithium-ion battery industry. Our findings indicate that TMT attention is essential for driving firms’ innovation responses, with two types of TMT attention—attention to TFPC incentives and attention to TFPC pressures—exerting distinct effects on both on-trajectory and off-trajectory innovations. Furthermore, the interaction between these two types of attention hinders a firms’ innovation decision making. Additionally, the different moderating roles of technical and relational capabilities were revealed. Overall, these findings contribute to the existing literature on technology-forcing policies and technological trajectory innovation, providing valuable insights into emerging technological innovation across various economies and industries.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.