对医科学生进步测试的看法和满意度

Q2 Social Sciences
Alejandra Pachas-Mu, Bruno Bouroncle-Derteano, Franco Romaní-Romaní
{"title":"对医科学生进步测试的看法和满意度","authors":"Alejandra Pachas-Mu,&nbsp;Bruno Bouroncle-Derteano,&nbsp;Franco Romaní-Romaní","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Progress tests have a positive impact on medical students' learning. The longer the year of study, the better students perceive and the more satisfied they are with this assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the trend of perceptions and level of satisfaction with respect to a progress test at a university in Lima, Peru.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study on all second- to sixth-year students exposed to a progress test who participated voluntarily. The self-administered questionnaire assessed three variables “Perceptions about the progress test”, “Perceptions about preparation for the progress test” and “Satisfaction” with items on a 5-category Likert scale, from strongly disagree/very dissatisfied/ (1 point) to strongly agree/very satisfied (5 points). We performed a descriptive analysis of the items and evaluated changes in scores between study years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>263 students participated, 142 were women (54.0%). We found that the favorable perception on progress tests decreases from the fourth year compared to the second year (H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Regarding satisfaction, we only found a difference in the score between the sixth and second year (H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In medical students, the favorable perception decreases the more tests performed. The trend in satisfaction is not clear. Students report that the length of the test generates fatigue, however, they value the subject matter and the evaluation of the questions in a clinical context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 101020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percepciones y satisfacción sobre una prueba de progreso en estudiantes de medicina\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Pachas-Mu,&nbsp;Bruno Bouroncle-Derteano,&nbsp;Franco Romaní-Romaní\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.101020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Progress tests have a positive impact on medical students' learning. The longer the year of study, the better students perceive and the more satisfied they are with this assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the trend of perceptions and level of satisfaction with respect to a progress test at a university in Lima, Peru.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study on all second- to sixth-year students exposed to a progress test who participated voluntarily. The self-administered questionnaire assessed three variables “Perceptions about the progress test”, “Perceptions about preparation for the progress test” and “Satisfaction” with items on a 5-category Likert scale, from strongly disagree/very dissatisfied/ (1 point) to strongly agree/very satisfied (5 points). We performed a descriptive analysis of the items and evaluated changes in scores between study years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>263 students participated, 142 were women (54.0%). We found that the favorable perception on progress tests decreases from the fourth year compared to the second year (H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Regarding satisfaction, we only found a difference in the score between the sixth and second year (H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In medical students, the favorable perception decreases the more tests performed. The trend in satisfaction is not clear. Students report that the length of the test generates fatigue, however, they value the subject matter and the evaluation of the questions in a clinical context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacion Medica\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacion Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324001359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324001359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进步性测验对医学生的学习有积极的影响。学习时间越长,学生的认知就越好,他们对这种评估也就越满意。我们的目标是评估对秘鲁利马一所大学的进度测试的看法趋势和满意度。方法我们对所有自愿参加进度测试的二至六年级学生进行了分析性横断面研究。自我管理的问卷评估了三个变量“对进度测试的看法”,“对进度测试准备的看法”和“满意度”对5类李克特量表项目的满意度,从非常不同意/非常不满意/(1分)到非常同意/非常满意(5分)。我们对这些项目进行了描述性分析,并评估了研究年份之间得分的变化。结果参加调查的学生263人,其中女生142人,占54.0%。我们发现,与第二年相比,第四年对进度测试的好感度有所下降(H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2,p <; 0.001)。关于满意度,我们只发现第六年和第二年的分数有差异(H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2,p <; 0.001)。结论医学生的好感度随测试次数的增加而降低。满意度的趋势尚不清楚。学生报告说,测试的长度产生疲劳,然而,他们重视的主题和评估的问题在临床环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percepciones y satisfacción sobre una prueba de progreso en estudiantes de medicina

Introduction

Progress tests have a positive impact on medical students' learning. The longer the year of study, the better students perceive and the more satisfied they are with this assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the trend of perceptions and level of satisfaction with respect to a progress test at a university in Lima, Peru.

Methods

We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study on all second- to sixth-year students exposed to a progress test who participated voluntarily. The self-administered questionnaire assessed three variables “Perceptions about the progress test”, “Perceptions about preparation for the progress test” and “Satisfaction” with items on a 5-category Likert scale, from strongly disagree/very dissatisfied/ (1 point) to strongly agree/very satisfied (5 points). We performed a descriptive analysis of the items and evaluated changes in scores between study years.

Results

263 students participated, 142 were women (54.0%). We found that the favorable perception on progress tests decreases from the fourth year compared to the second year (H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2, p < 0.001). Regarding satisfaction, we only found a difference in the score between the sixth and second year (H Kruskal-Wallis = 36.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In medical students, the favorable perception decreases the more tests performed. The trend in satisfaction is not clear. Students report that the length of the test generates fatigue, however, they value the subject matter and the evaluation of the questions in a clinical context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信