海洋生物与能源安全:争夺南非野生海岸的海上石油和天然气地震调查

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Richard Meissner
{"title":"海洋生物与能源安全:争夺南非野生海岸的海上石油和天然气地震调查","authors":"Richard Meissner","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In late 2021, protests occurred in South Africa against Shell's planned seismic surveys along the Wild Coast. Environmentalists have expressed concerns that these surveys could adversely affect marine life and harm fisheries and the ecological balance. Critics argued that Shell bypassed environmental assessments to gain permission for these surveys. Activists and protesters urged Shell and the government to halt the exploration to protect the Wild Coast and its marine life. Business owners in tourist areas were also worried about the potential impact on tourism. This topic became a national debate and gained significant attention from various media outlets. Shell and the Department of Minerals and Energy defended the exploration by stating that it would be sustainable and beneficial for the country's energy needs. The paper is a case study investigating offshore oil and gas exploration along the Wild Coast. Using the argumentative discourse analysis approach, the report aims to highlight the role of political science and international relations in deepening our understanding of the interaction between humans and marine and maritime resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 101575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marine life versus energy security: Contesting offshore oil and gas seismic surveys along South Africa's Wild Coast\",\"authors\":\"Richard Meissner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In late 2021, protests occurred in South Africa against Shell's planned seismic surveys along the Wild Coast. Environmentalists have expressed concerns that these surveys could adversely affect marine life and harm fisheries and the ecological balance. Critics argued that Shell bypassed environmental assessments to gain permission for these surveys. Activists and protesters urged Shell and the government to halt the exploration to protect the Wild Coast and its marine life. Business owners in tourist areas were also worried about the potential impact on tourism. This topic became a national debate and gained significant attention from various media outlets. Shell and the Department of Minerals and Energy defended the exploration by stating that it would be sustainable and beneficial for the country's energy needs. The paper is a case study investigating offshore oil and gas exploration along the Wild Coast. Using the argumentative discourse analysis approach, the report aims to highlight the role of political science and international relations in deepening our understanding of the interaction between humans and marine and maritime resources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001710\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年底,南非发生了针对壳牌计划在野生海岸进行地震调查的抗议活动。环保人士担心,这些调查可能会对海洋生物产生不利影响,破坏渔业和生态平衡。批评人士认为,壳牌绕过环境评估,获得了这些调查的许可。活动人士和抗议者敦促壳牌和政府停止勘探,以保护野生海岸及其海洋生物。旅游区的企业主也担心对旅游业的潜在影响。这个话题引起了全国性的争论,并引起了各大媒体的极大关注。壳牌和美国矿产和能源部为此次勘探活动进行了辩护,称其将是可持续的,并将有利于该国的能源需求。本文是一个调查野生海岸海上油气勘探的案例研究。该报告采用论证话语分析方法,旨在强调政治学和国际关系在加深我们对人类与海洋和海洋资源之间相互作用的理解方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marine life versus energy security: Contesting offshore oil and gas seismic surveys along South Africa's Wild Coast
In late 2021, protests occurred in South Africa against Shell's planned seismic surveys along the Wild Coast. Environmentalists have expressed concerns that these surveys could adversely affect marine life and harm fisheries and the ecological balance. Critics argued that Shell bypassed environmental assessments to gain permission for these surveys. Activists and protesters urged Shell and the government to halt the exploration to protect the Wild Coast and its marine life. Business owners in tourist areas were also worried about the potential impact on tourism. This topic became a national debate and gained significant attention from various media outlets. Shell and the Department of Minerals and Energy defended the exploration by stating that it would be sustainable and beneficial for the country's energy needs. The paper is a case study investigating offshore oil and gas exploration along the Wild Coast. Using the argumentative discourse analysis approach, the report aims to highlight the role of political science and international relations in deepening our understanding of the interaction between humans and marine and maritime resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信