农业生态系统中用于传粉者生物多样性恢复的野花条:哪些植物能够自播?

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Stefano Benvenuti
{"title":"农业生态系统中用于传粉者生物多样性恢复的野花条:哪些植物能够自播?","authors":"Stefano Benvenuti","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The success of wildflower strips for conserving pollinator biodiversity is often hampered by their poor sustainability, attributable to the short duration lifespan of the sown species. This three-year experiment aimed to: i) select the plant species that survived the agronomic disturbance practices implemented and ii) verify which crop management approach favoured their sustainability. Six experimental strips along the longest edges of the adjacent wheat crop were sown during the fall of 2019. The annual wildflower species that showed the best performances in emergence dynamics and seedling growth were some wildflowers derived from segetal weeds that are presently rare in conventional agroecosystems. The species <em>Centaurea cyanus</em>, <em>Agrostemma githago, Glebionis coronaria</em> among others attained the phenological stage of flowering most consistently, and also had the lowest mortality rates in the plant community studied. Despite preparing a stale seedbed, weeds were the most significant obstacle to the sustainability of the strips over time. Soil harrowing at the end of the summer lifecycle led to better plant survival performances (10.9 %) compared to senescent plant shredding (4.8 %). Harrowing also resulted in a greater wildflower survival the following year, as well as a higher number of pollinator visits. Honeybee visits were decreased by wildflower strip thinning over time, probably due to their typical constancy in the daily foraging choice for the same abundant species. A similar reduction was observed by the Lepidoptera. In contrast, generalist pollinators (i.e. Syrphidae, Bombyliidae, solitary bees and Coleoptera) were the least demanding pollinators in terms of the plant biodiversity of the sustainable wildflower strip. Harrowing led to a greater biodiversity of both wildflowers and pollinators (Shannon index, H′), and a lower weed dominance (Simpson index, D), compared to shredding. In summary, some segetal wildflowers could be incorporated into sustainable wildflower strips as they are self-seeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wildflower strips in the agroecosystem for pollinator biodiversity restoration: Which plant species are capable of self-seeding?\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Benvenuti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The success of wildflower strips for conserving pollinator biodiversity is often hampered by their poor sustainability, attributable to the short duration lifespan of the sown species. This three-year experiment aimed to: i) select the plant species that survived the agronomic disturbance practices implemented and ii) verify which crop management approach favoured their sustainability. Six experimental strips along the longest edges of the adjacent wheat crop were sown during the fall of 2019. The annual wildflower species that showed the best performances in emergence dynamics and seedling growth were some wildflowers derived from segetal weeds that are presently rare in conventional agroecosystems. The species <em>Centaurea cyanus</em>, <em>Agrostemma githago, Glebionis coronaria</em> among others attained the phenological stage of flowering most consistently, and also had the lowest mortality rates in the plant community studied. Despite preparing a stale seedbed, weeds were the most significant obstacle to the sustainability of the strips over time. Soil harrowing at the end of the summer lifecycle led to better plant survival performances (10.9 %) compared to senescent plant shredding (4.8 %). Harrowing also resulted in a greater wildflower survival the following year, as well as a higher number of pollinator visits. Honeybee visits were decreased by wildflower strip thinning over time, probably due to their typical constancy in the daily foraging choice for the same abundant species. A similar reduction was observed by the Lepidoptera. In contrast, generalist pollinators (i.e. Syrphidae, Bombyliidae, solitary bees and Coleoptera) were the least demanding pollinators in terms of the plant biodiversity of the sustainable wildflower strip. Harrowing led to a greater biodiversity of both wildflowers and pollinators (Shannon index, H′), and a lower weed dominance (Simpson index, D), compared to shredding. In summary, some segetal wildflowers could be incorporated into sustainable wildflower strips as they are self-seeding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野生花带在保护传粉媒介生物多样性方面的成功往往受到可持续性差的阻碍,这是由于播种物种的寿命较短。这项为期三年的试验旨在:i)选择在实施的农艺干扰措施中幸存下来的植物物种,ii)验证哪种作物管理方法有利于其可持续性。2019年秋季,沿着相邻小麦作物的最长边缘播种了六条试验条。在出苗动态和幼苗生长方面表现最好的一年生野花品种是一些目前在常规农业生态系统中罕见的分生杂草衍生的野花。Centaurea cyanus、Agrostemma githago、Glebionis coronaria等植物群落在花期物候阶段的一致性最高,且死亡率最低。尽管准备了陈旧的苗床,但随着时间的推移,杂草是带状植物可持续发展的最大障碍。在夏季生命周期结束时进行耙耕,植株成活率(10.9%)高于在植株衰老期进行撕碎(4.8%)。耙耕还导致第二年野花的存活率更高,传粉者的来访次数也更多。随着时间的推移,野花带变薄,蜜蜂的访问次数减少,可能是由于它们对相同丰富的物种的日常觅食选择具有典型的稳定性。鳞翅目也观察到类似的减少。而对可持续野花带植物多样性要求最低的传粉昆虫为通才传粉昆虫,即蚜蝇科、家蜂科、独居蜂和鞘翅目传粉昆虫。与切碎相比,耙耕导致野花和传粉媒介的生物多样性增加(Shannon指数,H '),杂草优势度降低(Simpson指数,D)。综上所述,一些分叶型野花具有自播性,可纳入可持续野花带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wildflower strips in the agroecosystem for pollinator biodiversity restoration: Which plant species are capable of self-seeding?
The success of wildflower strips for conserving pollinator biodiversity is often hampered by their poor sustainability, attributable to the short duration lifespan of the sown species. This three-year experiment aimed to: i) select the plant species that survived the agronomic disturbance practices implemented and ii) verify which crop management approach favoured their sustainability. Six experimental strips along the longest edges of the adjacent wheat crop were sown during the fall of 2019. The annual wildflower species that showed the best performances in emergence dynamics and seedling growth were some wildflowers derived from segetal weeds that are presently rare in conventional agroecosystems. The species Centaurea cyanus, Agrostemma githago, Glebionis coronaria among others attained the phenological stage of flowering most consistently, and also had the lowest mortality rates in the plant community studied. Despite preparing a stale seedbed, weeds were the most significant obstacle to the sustainability of the strips over time. Soil harrowing at the end of the summer lifecycle led to better plant survival performances (10.9 %) compared to senescent plant shredding (4.8 %). Harrowing also resulted in a greater wildflower survival the following year, as well as a higher number of pollinator visits. Honeybee visits were decreased by wildflower strip thinning over time, probably due to their typical constancy in the daily foraging choice for the same abundant species. A similar reduction was observed by the Lepidoptera. In contrast, generalist pollinators (i.e. Syrphidae, Bombyliidae, solitary bees and Coleoptera) were the least demanding pollinators in terms of the plant biodiversity of the sustainable wildflower strip. Harrowing led to a greater biodiversity of both wildflowers and pollinators (Shannon index, H′), and a lower weed dominance (Simpson index, D), compared to shredding. In summary, some segetal wildflowers could be incorporated into sustainable wildflower strips as they are self-seeding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信