整合不同年龄、残疾和社会经济阶层的菲律宾人的交叉需求,以实现包容性的人行道设计

Bernadette Anne Cervania , Gwyneth Dingalsan , Cheska Julianna Go , Dasha Deborah Wu , Krister Ian Daniel Roquel
{"title":"整合不同年龄、残疾和社会经济阶层的菲律宾人的交叉需求,以实现包容性的人行道设计","authors":"Bernadette Anne Cervania ,&nbsp;Gwyneth Dingalsan ,&nbsp;Cheska Julianna Go ,&nbsp;Dasha Deborah Wu ,&nbsp;Krister Ian Daniel Roquel","doi":"10.1016/j.eastsj.2024.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Everyone is entitled to adequate transit in public spaces, regardless of identity. However, general disregard for pedestrian needs resulted in poor urban planning and neglected walkways, critically affecting individuals of varied physical capabilities. The objectives are to evaluate the state of sidewalks today, pinpoint desirable elements, analyze crucial factors when assessing accessibility using an intersectional perspective, and suggest elements for inclusive design. This study emphasizes the significance of intersectionality in establishing equitable public places by considering the varied experiences of people depending on age, disability, and socioeconomic position. An Analytic Hierarchy Process centering on inclusive designs, with participants of multiple intersectional identities, was employed to generate their priorities. Findings showed mobility is a top criterion, while Transport Disadvantaged Persons facilities are attributes that all identity groups prioritize. This paper shows the differences, similarities, and priorities of 11 identity groups and their intersections with varying difficulty in physically accessing facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100131,"journal":{"name":"Asian Transport Studies","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating intersectional needs of Filipinos of different ages, disabilities, and socioeconomic classes for inclusive sidewalk design\",\"authors\":\"Bernadette Anne Cervania ,&nbsp;Gwyneth Dingalsan ,&nbsp;Cheska Julianna Go ,&nbsp;Dasha Deborah Wu ,&nbsp;Krister Ian Daniel Roquel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eastsj.2024.100156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Everyone is entitled to adequate transit in public spaces, regardless of identity. However, general disregard for pedestrian needs resulted in poor urban planning and neglected walkways, critically affecting individuals of varied physical capabilities. The objectives are to evaluate the state of sidewalks today, pinpoint desirable elements, analyze crucial factors when assessing accessibility using an intersectional perspective, and suggest elements for inclusive design. This study emphasizes the significance of intersectionality in establishing equitable public places by considering the varied experiences of people depending on age, disability, and socioeconomic position. An Analytic Hierarchy Process centering on inclusive designs, with participants of multiple intersectional identities, was employed to generate their priorities. Findings showed mobility is a top criterion, while Transport Disadvantaged Persons facilities are attributes that all identity groups prioritize. This paper shows the differences, similarities, and priorities of 11 identity groups and their intersections with varying difficulty in physically accessing facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Transport Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Transport Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556024000348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2185556024000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每个人,不论其身份,都有权在公共场所获得适当的交通。然而,对行人需求的普遍漠视导致了糟糕的城市规划和被忽视的人行道,严重影响了不同身体能力的个人。目的是评估当今人行道的状况,找出理想的元素,在使用交叉视角评估可达性时分析关键因素,并提出包容性设计的元素。本研究通过考虑不同年龄、残疾和社会经济地位的人的不同经历,强调了建立公平公共场所的交叉性的重要性。采用以包容性设计为中心的层次分析法,通过参与者的多重交叉身份来确定他们的优先级。调查结果显示,流动性是最重要的标准,而交通不便人士设施是所有身份群体优先考虑的属性。本文展示了11个身份群体的差异、相似点和优先级,以及他们在物理访问设施方面的不同困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating intersectional needs of Filipinos of different ages, disabilities, and socioeconomic classes for inclusive sidewalk design
Everyone is entitled to adequate transit in public spaces, regardless of identity. However, general disregard for pedestrian needs resulted in poor urban planning and neglected walkways, critically affecting individuals of varied physical capabilities. The objectives are to evaluate the state of sidewalks today, pinpoint desirable elements, analyze crucial factors when assessing accessibility using an intersectional perspective, and suggest elements for inclusive design. This study emphasizes the significance of intersectionality in establishing equitable public places by considering the varied experiences of people depending on age, disability, and socioeconomic position. An Analytic Hierarchy Process centering on inclusive designs, with participants of multiple intersectional identities, was employed to generate their priorities. Findings showed mobility is a top criterion, while Transport Disadvantaged Persons facilities are attributes that all identity groups prioritize. This paper shows the differences, similarities, and priorities of 11 identity groups and their intersections with varying difficulty in physically accessing facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信