模拟保质期延长对英国家庭新鲜农产品废物的影响

Rachel Devine , Sarah Key , Ellie Trotman , Cansu Kandemir , Tom Quested , Christian Reynolds , SC Lenny Koh , Penny Huckle
{"title":"模拟保质期延长对英国家庭新鲜农产品废物的影响","authors":"Rachel Devine ,&nbsp;Sarah Key ,&nbsp;Ellie Trotman ,&nbsp;Cansu Kandemir ,&nbsp;Tom Quested ,&nbsp;Christian Reynolds ,&nbsp;SC Lenny Koh ,&nbsp;Penny Huckle","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research uses the Household Simulation Model (HHSM), to assess shelf-life extension mechanisms for reducing fresh produce waste in UK homes. Removal of Best Before dates is the most effective mechanism, reducing waste by 8–28 percentage points depending on the product (e.g., for bananas, a modelled waste reduction from 24 % of purchases to 16 %, an 8 percentage-point reduction). The findings support current recommendations to remove Best Before dates on uncut fresh produce. Refrigerating apples at 4°C extends product shelf life from 31 to 108 days resulting in a modelled reduction of 2.5 percentage points from 3.1 % to 0.61 %. Storage at optimal fridge temperature (4°C compared to 9°C) shows a modelled waste reduction for cucumbers of 16 percentage points from 43 % to 27 %. However, both refrigeration mechanisms assume a major change in consumer behaviour which could be challenging to overcome. Edible bio-based coatings show a modelled reduction for oranges, satsumas, and avocados ranging from 3 to 12 percentage points, offering a high-reward, low-effort solution for reducing Household Food Waste (HHFW) with relatively low implementation costs. Plastic packaging removal varies by product with a 9-percentage point reduction for bananas, but no effect on apples and cucumber. Consumer behaviour and proportion of products sold packaged will substantially affect waste reductions. The broader impact of plastic packaging on food management practices is not fully considered in this study, so results should not inform policy decision-making. Whilst the findings are UK-specific, they offer insights for other countries, though country-specific data is recommended for policy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the impact of shelf-life extension on fresh produce waste in UK homes\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Devine ,&nbsp;Sarah Key ,&nbsp;Ellie Trotman ,&nbsp;Cansu Kandemir ,&nbsp;Tom Quested ,&nbsp;Christian Reynolds ,&nbsp;SC Lenny Koh ,&nbsp;Penny Huckle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research uses the Household Simulation Model (HHSM), to assess shelf-life extension mechanisms for reducing fresh produce waste in UK homes. Removal of Best Before dates is the most effective mechanism, reducing waste by 8–28 percentage points depending on the product (e.g., for bananas, a modelled waste reduction from 24 % of purchases to 16 %, an 8 percentage-point reduction). The findings support current recommendations to remove Best Before dates on uncut fresh produce. Refrigerating apples at 4°C extends product shelf life from 31 to 108 days resulting in a modelled reduction of 2.5 percentage points from 3.1 % to 0.61 %. Storage at optimal fridge temperature (4°C compared to 9°C) shows a modelled waste reduction for cucumbers of 16 percentage points from 43 % to 27 %. However, both refrigeration mechanisms assume a major change in consumer behaviour which could be challenging to overcome. Edible bio-based coatings show a modelled reduction for oranges, satsumas, and avocados ranging from 3 to 12 percentage points, offering a high-reward, low-effort solution for reducing Household Food Waste (HHFW) with relatively low implementation costs. Plastic packaging removal varies by product with a 9-percentage point reduction for bananas, but no effect on apples and cucumber. Consumer behaviour and proportion of products sold packaged will substantially affect waste reductions. The broader impact of plastic packaging on food management practices is not fully considered in this study, so results should not inform policy decision-making. Whilst the findings are UK-specific, they offer insights for other countries, though country-specific data is recommended for policy decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525000089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用家庭模拟模型(HHSM)来评估英国家庭减少新鲜农产品浪费的保质期延长机制。去除最佳食用日期是最有效的机制,根据产品的不同,可以减少8 - 28个百分点的浪费(例如,香蕉的模拟浪费从24% %减少到16% %,减少了8个百分点)。该研究结果支持了目前的建议,即在未切割的新鲜农产品上去掉最佳食用日期。在4°C下冷藏苹果可将产品的保质期从31天延长至108天,从而使模拟结果降低2.5个百分点,从3.1 %降至0.61 %。在最佳冰箱温度下储存(4°C与9°C相比)显示,黄瓜的模拟废物减少了16个百分点,从43 %减少到27 %。然而,这两种制冷机制都假设消费者行为发生重大变化,这可能是难以克服的。可食用生物基涂料模型显示,橙子、蜜橘和牛油果的排放量减少了3到12个百分点,为减少家庭食物浪费(HHFW)提供了一个高回报、低努力的解决方案,实施成本相对较低。塑料包装的去除因产品而异,香蕉的塑料包装减少了9个百分点,但对苹果和黄瓜没有影响。消费者行为和包装销售的产品比例将对减少废物产生重大影响。本研究并未充分考虑塑料包装对食品管理实践的更广泛影响,因此结果不应为政策决策提供信息。虽然调查结果是英国特有的,但它们为其他国家提供了见解,尽管建议在制定政策时提供针对具体国家的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling the impact of shelf-life extension on fresh produce waste in UK homes
This research uses the Household Simulation Model (HHSM), to assess shelf-life extension mechanisms for reducing fresh produce waste in UK homes. Removal of Best Before dates is the most effective mechanism, reducing waste by 8–28 percentage points depending on the product (e.g., for bananas, a modelled waste reduction from 24 % of purchases to 16 %, an 8 percentage-point reduction). The findings support current recommendations to remove Best Before dates on uncut fresh produce. Refrigerating apples at 4°C extends product shelf life from 31 to 108 days resulting in a modelled reduction of 2.5 percentage points from 3.1 % to 0.61 %. Storage at optimal fridge temperature (4°C compared to 9°C) shows a modelled waste reduction for cucumbers of 16 percentage points from 43 % to 27 %. However, both refrigeration mechanisms assume a major change in consumer behaviour which could be challenging to overcome. Edible bio-based coatings show a modelled reduction for oranges, satsumas, and avocados ranging from 3 to 12 percentage points, offering a high-reward, low-effort solution for reducing Household Food Waste (HHFW) with relatively low implementation costs. Plastic packaging removal varies by product with a 9-percentage point reduction for bananas, but no effect on apples and cucumber. Consumer behaviour and proportion of products sold packaged will substantially affect waste reductions. The broader impact of plastic packaging on food management practices is not fully considered in this study, so results should not inform policy decision-making. Whilst the findings are UK-specific, they offer insights for other countries, though country-specific data is recommended for policy decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信